Some men will do long distance relationships

theblueprints

theblueprints

Sphinx
Joined
Feb 5, 2026
Posts
2,933
Reputation
5,909
1783341105729
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: prettyboylite, MixedBoyo12, Souleth and 6 others
Some men will be cucks of course, most men even
 
  • +1
Reactions: Outlander and theblueprints
Although I don't agree with long-distance relationships, I wholeheartedly believe the word 'cuck' has lost its meaning.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: RedDragonSlayer67, Orka, jgrey080 and 1 other person
Although I don't agree with long-distance relationships, I wholeheartedly believe the word 'cuck' has lost its meaning.
It literally makes sense in this context, you just really wanted to say this
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Aㅤㅤㅤ and jgrey080
'Yeah bro she lives 2000km away from me but we plan on meeting soon'

Just wrap it up bro
1783341218764
 
  • JFL
Reactions: theblueprints
my fatass cousin is in a long distance relationship rn:hnghn:
 
  • +1
Reactions: theblueprints
It literally makes sense in this context, you just really wanted to say this
No, it doesn't because, by definition, cuckoldry is consensual non-monogamy.

If your girlfriend cheats on you on a random Tuesday without you being aware, by your own logic, you're a cuck.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Orka and theblueprints
No, it doesn't because, by definition, cuckoldry is consensual non-monogamy.

If your girlfriend cheats on you on a random Tuesday without you being aware, by your own logic, you're a cuck.
If you're in a long-distance relationship, you're basically signing yourself up to be cheated on. It's almost a certainty. That's nigh cuckoldry.
 
  • +1
Reactions: theblueprints
No, it doesn't because, by definition, cuckoldry is consensual non-monogamy.

If your girlfriend cheats on you on a random Tuesday without you being aware, by your own logic, you're a cuck.
You’re cucking yourself by agreeing to this relationship. It’s quite literally a perfect usage of the word
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Aㅤㅤㅤ
If you're in a long-distance relationship, you're basically signing yourself up to be cheated on. It's almost a certainty. That's nigh cuckoldry.
Yes, I think there's a chance of being cheated on when you're doing long-distance. Hence why I don't agree with doing them. It's still not cuckoldry.

Being in a relationship in general means that you have a chance of being cheated on. If that chance so happens to occur, you wouldn't refer to it as cuckoldry.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Notorious_1676 and Orka
You’re cucking yourself by agreeing to this relationship.
Agreeing to a relationship =/= cucked.

If you've ever been in a relationship before, by your own definition, you've been cucked before.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: theblueprints
Being in a relationship in general means that you have a chance of being cheated on. If that chance so happens to occur, you wouldn't refer to it as cuckoldry
You’re juxtaposing normal relationships to long distance. These are not comparable in the slightest
 
You’re cucking yourself by agreeing to this relationship. It’s quite literally a perfect usage of the word
Is it more likely that your gf will cheat on you if you're long distance? yes, are you expecting/wanting to get cheated on? no

A is right
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: theblueprints and Aㅤㅤㅤ
You’re juxtaposing normal relationships to long distance. These are not comparable in the slightest
You're simply asserting that I am. That's not a counterargument to my statement.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Orka
You’re juxtaposing normal relationships to long distance. These are not comparable in the slightest
There is an expectation of exclusivity in both relationships
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: theblueprints and Aㅤㅤㅤ
You're simply asserting that I am. That's not a counterargument to my statement.
You were arguing that the word has lost its meaning, but the modern definition literally began because of porn/bdsm kinks. The traditional definition was rooted in how men are unaware of when there wives are getting piped. That’s why the term has changed
 
The traditional definition was rooted in how men are unaware of when there wives are getting piped.
Let's say you have a great relationship with a girl, you're head over heels for her and she's your best friend, then she cheats on you with some random dude, are you going to start going out calling yourself a cuck? Or are you going to say you got cheated on?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aㅤㅤㅤ
The traditional definition was rooted in how men are unaware of when there wives are getting piped.
What the fuck? That was never the definition of cuckoldry. In fact, it was literally rooted in the partner being AWARE of their wives being piped. Why the fuck do you think there's a thing called a 'cuck chair'? Because they're unaware...? Lmfao.
 
What the fuck? That was never the definition of cuckoldry. In fact, it was literally rooted in the partner being AWARE of their wives being piped. Why the fuck do you think there's a thing called a 'cuck chair'? Because they're unaware...? Lmfao.
Cuck chair is litterally a modern saying, as I just described how the term has changed overtime. You were literally the one talking about how it’s lost its meaning lmao
Let's say you have a great relationship with a girl, you're head over heels for her and she's your best friend, then she cheats on you with some random dude, are you going to start going out calling yourself a cuck? Or are you going to say you got cheated on?
unrelated. I’m talking about how when you sign up for long distance you’re cucking yourself because you’re pretty much singing up for your partner to get piped. It’s literally the definition of cucking lmfao. Aware ur partner getting railed. Your point?
 
unrelated. I’m talking about how when you sign up for long distance you’re cucking yourself because you’re pretty much singing up for your partner to get piped. It’s literally the definition of cucking lmfao. Aware ur partner getting railed. Your point?
It is completely related, you would not be expecting to get cheated on in either situation, you're bringing up the historic definition as if that holds any weight, A's original point is that the modern definition of consenting to your partner going with someone else lost value, because of statements like this where the subject would not be consenting to their partner cheating on them

It is perfectly fine to be incorrect and being incorrect in something doesn't reflect your intelligence, you don't need to die on this hill
 
It is completely related, you would not be expecting to get cheated on in either situation, you're bringing up the historic definition as if that holds any weight, A's original point is that the modern definition of consenting to your partner going with someone else lost value, because of statements like this where the subject would not be consenting to their partner cheating on them

It is perfectly fine to be incorrect and being incorrect in something doesn't reflect your intelligence, you don't need to die on this hill
A talked about how the term has lost its meaning. I’m simply bringing up what’s it’s meant in the present and the past. I’m going to accept when I’m wrong, but so far I don’t see how I am.

You also said you’re “not expecting it” What kind of retard isn’t expecting it?
 
Its genuinely crazy that you can't trust your girl not to cheat on you the second that you're both a long distance away from each other.

A bunch of perverted animals with no self control.
 
Its genuinely crazy that you can't trust your girl not to cheat on you the second that you're both a long distance away from each other.

A bunch of perverted animals with no self control.
Ye it's 100% impossible even actual chads gets cheated on when both are in distance for quite some time, and if ur below htn it's 100% guaranteed for a woman to cheat, crazy to think about

I guarantee this also as I've known 3 instances in my family and 4 instances on friend group that this happened
 
  • +1
Reactions: Notorious_1676
That applies to all romantic relationships, not just long distance
 

Similar threads

theblueprints
Replies
4
Views
33
theblueprints
theblueprints
160cmcurry
Replies
0
Views
33
160cmcurry
160cmcurry
dbish
Replies
9
Views
78
slaviccartfiend
slaviccartfiend
chukopops
Replies
9
Views
73
TilEagle
TilEagle
ohhohh
Replies
18
Views
64
LeonardMariana
LeonardMariana

Users who are viewing this thread

  • optimisticzoomer
  • Outlander
  • RedDragonSlayer67
  • Mob Boss
  • AscendHQ
  • fantamaxxer
  • Ihatezexuus
  • MixedBoyo12
  • SIMPLEMAN
  • MrCrig
  • funnypaint49
Back
Top