AsGoodAsItGets
God's Favorite
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2020
- Posts
- 3,716
- Reputation
- 3,709
OBSERVE REALITY.
NOT ONLY YOUR OWN, BUT THE REST OF THE WORLD.
FIND A LANE, PROFIT. IT'S SIMPLE, REALLY.
WASN'T PLANNING ON MAKING ANY MORE THREADS, BUT PEOPLE KEEP BEING BLIND TO REALITY. ALL THREADS I'VE MADE WERE COMMENT RESPONSES TO SOMEONE, WHICH SIMPLY GREW BIG ENOUGH TO POST AS A SEPARATE THREAD, FOR VISIBILITY AND OVERALL BETTER USE AND IMPACT OF MY TIME AND ENERGY TO PROFIT THE FEW WHO ARE PERCEPTIVE AND CAN COMPREHEND MORE WORDS THAN THOSE THAT WILL FIT ON AN IPHONE SCREEN AT A TIME. SIMPLY BECAUSE ONLY 10% OF USERS ON THIS FORUM (ANY FORUM) WILL ACTUALLY CHANGE THEIR LIFE FOR THE BETTER AND I WANT THIS TO BE SEEN BY THEM. THINK - HOW MANY OF YOU HAVE A ROUTINE SET, HOW MANY HAVE AN ACTUAL BUYING SCHEDULE FOR PRODUCTS, HOW MANY OF YOU HAVE TIMELINES FOR SOFT MAX GOALS, HARD MAX GOALS AND DO AUDITS AT THE END OF THE SPECIFIED TIME? THIS IS IN EXCLUSION OF YOUR OTHER GOALS AS A MAN - FINANCES, NETWORK, MASTERY OF YOUR CHOSEN FIELD. ARE YOU THAT 10%? IF NOT, WRITE DN RD OR SOME LOW IQ SHIT, MOVE ON AND LEAVE THE BIG WORDS TO THE APEX. I'M DOING YOU A SERVICE BY SAVING YOUR TIME READING THIS BECAUSE YOU WILL NOT TAKE ACTION.
CONTEXT: IN RESPONSE TO @Immanuel 'S COMMENT:
ON MY PREVIOUS THREAD:
STACYSEXUALITY EP1: WHY YOU ARE SOFT.
READ AGAIN. THIS WHOLE POST IS A COMPARISON OF A STACEY'S (OR TOP GENETICS AESTHETICALLY SPEAKING) VIABILITY AS A SERIOUS LEGACY BUILDING (CHILD BEARING, CHILD CARING) PARTNER TO LOWER TIER WOMEN. (IN RESPONSE TO @Xangsane COMMENT/ POST LINKED IN OP). HAVE CONTEXT. HE TALKS ABOUT PERSONALITY VS. LOOKS DECISION MAKING PROCESS. MY ARGUMENT IS THAT I CAN FIND A BETTER LOOKING WOMAN WITH THE SAME PERSONALITY AS A LOWER TIER WOMAN AS LONG AS I'M X, Y, Z, (I COULD MAKE ANOTHER POST ABOUT THIS BUT YOU GET IT - LOOKS, STATUS, MONEY, POWER, NETWORK, HERITAGE, ATHLETICISM). IT'S PURELY LOGICAL.
ESCORTS GET PAID. DUH? THEY DONT DO IT FOR FREE. THATS THE ARGUMENT FOR A LOW TIER WOMAN WHORING HERSELF OUT FOR FREE TO FEEL BETTER. NOT THAT WOMEN ONLY HAVE SEX IF THEY'RE IN SECURE. AND NOT ALL WOMEN. STATISTICS WORKS INCLUSIVE OF OUTLIERS. UNDERSTAND MATH. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TAKING A POOL OF 500 HIGH TIER VS 500 LOWER TIER WOMEN, THEN AVERAGING THEIR SEXUAL PARTNERS ON A WILLING, CONSENSUAL AND SEXUAL ATTRACTION BASIS NOT PROFESSION.
"ALMOST ALL WOMEN" AS YOU SAY CAN PICK AND CHOOSE. YES, OF COURSE. THAT MAKES "ALMOST ALL WOMEN"'S OPPORTUNITY INCREASE THE SAME AS THEIR COMPETITION, OTHER WOMEN. AGAIN UNDERSTAND MATH.
IF YOU'RE NOT A WOMAN, YOU CERTAINLY THINK AND USE MATH LIKE ONE.
@Immanuel , ON THE PREVIOUS NOTE, THIS IS PURE GENETICS AND MATH. AGAIN, TAKE 500 HIGH TIER ESCORTS VS. 500 LOW TIER ESCORTS. YOU WOULD AGREE THAT THE HIGH TIER ESCORTS (IN A MATH SENSE) HAVE THE BETTER CHOICE TO SELECT THE BETTER CUSTOMERS, EVEN WITH A MONETARY TRANSACTION INVOLVED. PRETTY SIMPLE ISN'T IT? BETTER CUSTOMER = HIGHER PAYING, LOWER TROUBLE, BETTER TERMS OF PAYMENT, BETTER TIME TO MONEY INVOLVEMENT RATIO. WHATS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND? AGAIN THERE WILL BE A PART OF THE STATISTIC THAT GOES THE OTHER WAY, OF COURSE. THAT'S HOW STATISTICS WORK. STANDARD BELL CURVE BELOW:
View attachment 1894294
PLOT X AS ATTRACTIVENESS, FEMININITY, DEPENDABILITY ETC OF WOMAN, Y AS NO. OF PARTNERS.
ITS THE SAME FOR MEN, THE CURVE, ONLY THE X AXIS INCLUDES AN AVERAGE OF A DIFFERENT SET OF METRIC, LIKE - ATTRACTIVENESS, STATUS, MONEY, POWER, NETWORK, HERITAGE, ATHLETICISM, INDUSTRIOUSNESS ETC.
WHY IS IT DIFFERENT? (FOR THE PC FOLK) BECAUSE YOUR SURVIVAL STRATEGY MATTERS ON YOUR GENDER. THE MORE DANGEROUS OR PRIMAL THE PLACE YOU LIVE IN, THE CLOSER YOU ARE TO YOUR GENDER BASED SURVIVAL STRATEGY. IT SIMPLE MAKES BETTER SENSE. IT'S INTELLIGENT DECISION MAKING.
NOW, ONE WOULD SAY "WHY WOULDN'T YOU FUCK AS MANY WOMEN AS YOU CAN IF YOU'RE A TOP TIER MAN" YOU COULD, BUT ONCE YOU'RE PAST TEENAGE, AS LONG AS YOU'RE GIFTED AND HAVE POTENTIAL, THIS IS SIMPLY NOT YOUR BIGGEST GOAL, TO FUCK LIKE RABBITS AT THE COST OF YOUR REPUTATION. YEAH SURE BUT WHY RISK EVERYTHING - IN CHILD SUPPORT, IN ACCUSATIONS, IN REPUTATION. THERE IS A REAL WORLD WITH JUDGEMENT BECAUSE WE LIVE IN A SOCIETY. IT SHOULDN'T BE, BUT THATS JUST THE WAY IT IS. YOU PLAY AND WIN / LOSE OR YOU REFUSE TO ACCEPT REALITY AND YOU LOSE. CHANCES OF WINNING = GENETICS + EPIGENETICS.
FUCK LUCK. YOU'LL ALWAYS FIND SOMEONE WHO WERE BORN WITH THE SAME POTENTIAL / BASE BUT WENT COMPLETELY DIFFERENT WAYS AND HAD A DIFFERENT FATE. FATE VS. DESTINY. NUMEROUS DICAPRIO LOOKALIKES. VAL KILMER VS. TOM CRUISE. BEND OVER TO FATE OR CREATE YOUR DESTINY. YOU THINK TOM CRUISE GOT LUCKY STAYING IN TOP SHAPE? JFL.
IT COMES DOWN TO "YOU HAVE MORE TO LOSE" FROM HAVING MORE PARTNERS WHEN AT THE TOP AS A WOMAN OR MAN.
FOR MEN, CONSIDER TIGER WOODS. WHAT HAPPENED TO HIM? HE'S ALRIGHT BUT HE'LL NEVER BE "TIGER WOODS" WORLD CHAMPION, HE'S REMEMBERED FOR SOMETHING ELSE. CONSIDER C. RONADLO. EVER WONDERED WHY HE DOESN'T FUCK ALL THE FANS? WELL, REPUTATION. AND AT A BIOLOGICAL LEVEL, WINNING CERTAINLY GIVES HIM A BETTER HIGH THAN FUCKING A FAN BEHIND THE STANDS.
OR FOR WOMEN, ANY SUPER MODEL. AGAIN, HOW MANY EXTREMELY SEXY TOP TIER PORNSTARS DO YOU SEE VS. MODELS? IT'S COMPLETELY UNMATCHED AND, THE STATISTIC. IF YOU COULD BE A TOP TIER MODEL (TOP SHELF GENETICS - MOSTLY EUROCENTRIC) OR ACTRESS (ACTING ABILITY) WITH RESPECT, ACCESS TO TOP TIER MEN, POWER, WHY WOULD YOU BE A PORNSTAR WHO GETS SPIT ON CAMERA, TREATED LIKE A SLUT IN SOCIETY, USED LIKE AN OBJECT.
IT'S NOT ABOUT CHOICES, IT'S ABOUT CONSEQUENCES.
NOT ONLY YOUR OWN, BUT THE REST OF THE WORLD.
FIND A LANE, PROFIT. IT'S SIMPLE, REALLY.
WASN'T PLANNING ON MAKING ANY MORE THREADS, BUT PEOPLE KEEP BEING BLIND TO REALITY. ALL THREADS I'VE MADE WERE COMMENT RESPONSES TO SOMEONE, WHICH SIMPLY GREW BIG ENOUGH TO POST AS A SEPARATE THREAD, FOR VISIBILITY AND OVERALL BETTER USE AND IMPACT OF MY TIME AND ENERGY TO PROFIT THE FEW WHO ARE PERCEPTIVE AND CAN COMPREHEND MORE WORDS THAN THOSE THAT WILL FIT ON AN IPHONE SCREEN AT A TIME. SIMPLY BECAUSE ONLY 10% OF USERS ON THIS FORUM (ANY FORUM) WILL ACTUALLY CHANGE THEIR LIFE FOR THE BETTER AND I WANT THIS TO BE SEEN BY THEM. THINK - HOW MANY OF YOU HAVE A ROUTINE SET, HOW MANY HAVE AN ACTUAL BUYING SCHEDULE FOR PRODUCTS, HOW MANY OF YOU HAVE TIMELINES FOR SOFT MAX GOALS, HARD MAX GOALS AND DO AUDITS AT THE END OF THE SPECIFIED TIME? THIS IS IN EXCLUSION OF YOUR OTHER GOALS AS A MAN - FINANCES, NETWORK, MASTERY OF YOUR CHOSEN FIELD. ARE YOU THAT 10%? IF NOT, WRITE DN RD OR SOME LOW IQ SHIT, MOVE ON AND LEAVE THE BIG WORDS TO THE APEX. I'M DOING YOU A SERVICE BY SAVING YOUR TIME READING THIS BECAUSE YOU WILL NOT TAKE ACTION.
CONTEXT: IN RESPONSE TO @Immanuel 'S COMMENT:
ON MY PREVIOUS THREAD:
STACYSEXUALITY EP1: WHY YOU ARE SOFT.
READ AGAIN. THIS WHOLE POST IS A COMPARISON OF A STACEY'S (OR TOP GENETICS AESTHETICALLY SPEAKING) VIABILITY AS A SERIOUS LEGACY BUILDING (CHILD BEARING, CHILD CARING) PARTNER TO LOWER TIER WOMEN. (IN RESPONSE TO @Xangsane COMMENT/ POST LINKED IN OP). HAVE CONTEXT. HE TALKS ABOUT PERSONALITY VS. LOOKS DECISION MAKING PROCESS. MY ARGUMENT IS THAT I CAN FIND A BETTER LOOKING WOMAN WITH THE SAME PERSONALITY AS A LOWER TIER WOMAN AS LONG AS I'M X, Y, Z, (I COULD MAKE ANOTHER POST ABOUT THIS BUT YOU GET IT - LOOKS, STATUS, MONEY, POWER, NETWORK, HERITAGE, ATHLETICISM). IT'S PURELY LOGICAL.
ESCORTS GET PAID. DUH? THEY DONT DO IT FOR FREE. THATS THE ARGUMENT FOR A LOW TIER WOMAN WHORING HERSELF OUT FOR FREE TO FEEL BETTER. NOT THAT WOMEN ONLY HAVE SEX IF THEY'RE IN SECURE. AND NOT ALL WOMEN. STATISTICS WORKS INCLUSIVE OF OUTLIERS. UNDERSTAND MATH. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TAKING A POOL OF 500 HIGH TIER VS 500 LOWER TIER WOMEN, THEN AVERAGING THEIR SEXUAL PARTNERS ON A WILLING, CONSENSUAL AND SEXUAL ATTRACTION BASIS NOT PROFESSION.
"ALMOST ALL WOMEN" AS YOU SAY CAN PICK AND CHOOSE. YES, OF COURSE. THAT MAKES "ALMOST ALL WOMEN"'S OPPORTUNITY INCREASE THE SAME AS THEIR COMPETITION, OTHER WOMEN. AGAIN UNDERSTAND MATH.
IF YOU'RE NOT A WOMAN, YOU CERTAINLY THINK AND USE MATH LIKE ONE.
I'M ONLY USING YOUR COMMENT TO MAKE GOOD DISCOURSE, YOU'RE INTELLIGENT. CONSIDER THIS. A STACY IS THE TOP SALESPERSON THAT BRINGS IN THE MASSIVE ACCOUNTS. THEY DEAL WITH THE BEST AND ONLY THE FEW, BECAUSE THEY HAVE A BETTER STRATEGY AND PERSUASIVE SET OF TOOLS IN THEIR KIT. THIS SIMPLY ENABLES THEM TO MEET THEIR "EMOTIONAL TARGET" WITH BETTER, BIGGER ACCOUNTS. THE LOWER TIER WOMEN ARE SCRAMBLING FOR SCRAPS, GETTING EVERY SMALL ACCOUNT BECAUSE THEY CAN'T MEET THEIR "EMOTIONAL TARGET".
@Immanuel , ON THE PREVIOUS NOTE, THIS IS PURE GENETICS AND MATH. AGAIN, TAKE 500 HIGH TIER ESCORTS VS. 500 LOW TIER ESCORTS. YOU WOULD AGREE THAT THE HIGH TIER ESCORTS (IN A MATH SENSE) HAVE THE BETTER CHOICE TO SELECT THE BETTER CUSTOMERS, EVEN WITH A MONETARY TRANSACTION INVOLVED. PRETTY SIMPLE ISN'T IT? BETTER CUSTOMER = HIGHER PAYING, LOWER TROUBLE, BETTER TERMS OF PAYMENT, BETTER TIME TO MONEY INVOLVEMENT RATIO. WHATS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND? AGAIN THERE WILL BE A PART OF THE STATISTIC THAT GOES THE OTHER WAY, OF COURSE. THAT'S HOW STATISTICS WORK. STANDARD BELL CURVE BELOW:
View attachment 1894294
PLOT X AS ATTRACTIVENESS, FEMININITY, DEPENDABILITY ETC OF WOMAN, Y AS NO. OF PARTNERS.
ITS THE SAME FOR MEN, THE CURVE, ONLY THE X AXIS INCLUDES AN AVERAGE OF A DIFFERENT SET OF METRIC, LIKE - ATTRACTIVENESS, STATUS, MONEY, POWER, NETWORK, HERITAGE, ATHLETICISM, INDUSTRIOUSNESS ETC.
WHY IS IT DIFFERENT? (FOR THE PC FOLK) BECAUSE YOUR SURVIVAL STRATEGY MATTERS ON YOUR GENDER. THE MORE DANGEROUS OR PRIMAL THE PLACE YOU LIVE IN, THE CLOSER YOU ARE TO YOUR GENDER BASED SURVIVAL STRATEGY. IT SIMPLE MAKES BETTER SENSE. IT'S INTELLIGENT DECISION MAKING.
NOW, ONE WOULD SAY "WHY WOULDN'T YOU FUCK AS MANY WOMEN AS YOU CAN IF YOU'RE A TOP TIER MAN" YOU COULD, BUT ONCE YOU'RE PAST TEENAGE, AS LONG AS YOU'RE GIFTED AND HAVE POTENTIAL, THIS IS SIMPLY NOT YOUR BIGGEST GOAL, TO FUCK LIKE RABBITS AT THE COST OF YOUR REPUTATION. YEAH SURE BUT WHY RISK EVERYTHING - IN CHILD SUPPORT, IN ACCUSATIONS, IN REPUTATION. THERE IS A REAL WORLD WITH JUDGEMENT BECAUSE WE LIVE IN A SOCIETY. IT SHOULDN'T BE, BUT THATS JUST THE WAY IT IS. YOU PLAY AND WIN / LOSE OR YOU REFUSE TO ACCEPT REALITY AND YOU LOSE. CHANCES OF WINNING = GENETICS + EPIGENETICS.
FUCK LUCK. YOU'LL ALWAYS FIND SOMEONE WHO WERE BORN WITH THE SAME POTENTIAL / BASE BUT WENT COMPLETELY DIFFERENT WAYS AND HAD A DIFFERENT FATE. FATE VS. DESTINY. NUMEROUS DICAPRIO LOOKALIKES. VAL KILMER VS. TOM CRUISE. BEND OVER TO FATE OR CREATE YOUR DESTINY. YOU THINK TOM CRUISE GOT LUCKY STAYING IN TOP SHAPE? JFL.
IT COMES DOWN TO "YOU HAVE MORE TO LOSE" FROM HAVING MORE PARTNERS WHEN AT THE TOP AS A WOMAN OR MAN.
FOR MEN, CONSIDER TIGER WOODS. WHAT HAPPENED TO HIM? HE'S ALRIGHT BUT HE'LL NEVER BE "TIGER WOODS" WORLD CHAMPION, HE'S REMEMBERED FOR SOMETHING ELSE. CONSIDER C. RONADLO. EVER WONDERED WHY HE DOESN'T FUCK ALL THE FANS? WELL, REPUTATION. AND AT A BIOLOGICAL LEVEL, WINNING CERTAINLY GIVES HIM A BETTER HIGH THAN FUCKING A FAN BEHIND THE STANDS.
OR FOR WOMEN, ANY SUPER MODEL. AGAIN, HOW MANY EXTREMELY SEXY TOP TIER PORNSTARS DO YOU SEE VS. MODELS? IT'S COMPLETELY UNMATCHED AND, THE STATISTIC. IF YOU COULD BE A TOP TIER MODEL (TOP SHELF GENETICS - MOSTLY EUROCENTRIC) OR ACTRESS (ACTING ABILITY) WITH RESPECT, ACCESS TO TOP TIER MEN, POWER, WHY WOULD YOU BE A PORNSTAR WHO GETS SPIT ON CAMERA, TREATED LIKE A SLUT IN SOCIETY, USED LIKE AN OBJECT.
IT'S NOT ABOUT CHOICES, IT'S ABOUT CONSEQUENCES.
