Standardized Ideal Ratios

thecel

thecel

morph king
Joined
May 16, 2020
Posts
26,119
Reputation
57,041
The problem with feature-relative ratios such as the 1.618 mouth-to-nose width ratio is that they don’t work if the reference feature (in this case, the nose) is of subhuman dimensions.

That’s why we need all ratios standardized. All horizontal ratios should be in relation to the bizygomatic width, and all vertical ratios should be in relation to the facial height (hairline to chin distance).

Why are standardized ratios superior? Take the ES ratio for example. Before PSL, people used the rule of thumb that eyes should be one eye width apart. Obviously this doesn't mean shit if you have a narrow PFL. It’s pretty clear that ES ratio mogs “one eye width between” into oblivion.

Standardized ideal horizontal ratios:
  • IPD/ES: 0.47
  • PFL: 0.235
  • Nose width: 0.235
  • Mouth width: 0.38*
I’m too lazy to do the vertical ratios. JFL

*Another mouth width guideline is that the corners of the lips should line up with the inside edges of the irises. Using an iris diameter of 12mm, the result is a mouth width ratio of 0.376 which is very close to 0.38.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: mandiblade, Deleted member 1973 and Deleted member 6856
The bolded part is really all anyone needs to read
Soyboy28
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
another useless ratio thread that has nothing do w looksmaxxing or actual attractiveness, redefining this stuff is completely futile
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and imparatorluk
another useless ratio thread that has nothing do w looksmaxxing or actual attractiveness, redefining this stuff is completely futile

Ideal ratios are useful to quantify the degree of subhumanness of one’s face.

Many of the current mainstream ideals (e.g. three-finger forehead height, which isn’t even a ratio) are flawed, and some ratios (e.g. nose to philtrum ratio) are really underrated. Looksmaxxers should promote the usage of these underrated ratios and improve upon existing ratios.

The more ratios we have, the better we can define the ideal face, thus enabling us to measure how far off our own faces are from the ideal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1973

Similar threads

Eyesfullofascend
Replies
3
Views
35
Eyesfullofascend
Eyesfullofascend
germanroses
Replies
8
Views
134
jska
jska
ilovekolaches
Replies
3
Views
77
ilovekolaches
ilovekolaches
AlexoJeLTN
Replies
4
Views
53
htnframemax
htnframemax
TajManzoor
Replies
7
Views
86
Hadee
Hadee

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top