stop this race superiority cope

[theRetard]

well u clearly cant prove that a recessed horseface side profile is ideal

can you prove that i claimed something like that?

 

[pfl]

can you prove that i claimed something like that?

 

[foidletslayer]

so, can you prove that i claimed something that needs to be proved empirically?
or what kind of proof you are talking about

Okay, so you as the OP claimed in the initial post that “no race is superior to any other race” yet you haven’t proven it you only made further claims without empirical evidence, you can’t keep pulling out the burden of proof fallacy because you yourself aren’t abiding by it

 

[foidletslayer]

cope

show me a picture of the most average person you can think of who isn’t fat bcs a average person isn’t fat

 

[theRetard]

Okay, so you as the OP claimed in the initial post that “no race is superior to any other race” yet you haven’t proven it you only made further claims without empirical evidence, you can’t keep pulling out the burden of proof fallacy because you yourself aren’t abiding by it

ok man, can you EMPIRICALLY prove that i must prove something empirically??? these are just further claims JFL.

 

[theRetard]

show me a picture of the most average person you can think of who isn’t fat bcs a average person isn’t fat

make a research for an average person

 

[foidletslayer]

make a research for an average person

too lazy show me if you may

 

[theRetard]

View attachment 4265378

alright, can you point it where i claimed that recessed horseface is ideal?

 

[foidletslayer]

ok man, can you EMPIRICALLY prove that i must prove something empirically??? these are just further claims JFL.

Too long you, you always do the same BS u know no one is bored enough to logically break down your claims and arguments but you also never do and then invoke burden of proof fallacy, your reasoning is circular enough for me to not argue further

 

[pfl]

alright, can you point it where i claimed that recessed horseface is ideal?

by claiming that the greek statues are ideal? are u retarded

 

[theRetard]

too lazy show me if you may

ok then i'm also too lazy

Too long you, you always do the same BS u know no one is bored enough to logically break down your claims and arguments but you also never do and then invoke burden of proof fallacy, your reasoning is circular enough for me to not argue further

you can only spam ad hominems. I will repeat this: can you empirically prove that i need to prove something empirically:???

 

[theRetard]

by claiming that the greek statues are ideal? are u retarded

so they aren't the ideal? can you prove that they aren't?

 

[pfl]

so they aren't the ideal? can you prove that they aren't?

because they have proportions that arent ideal?

 

[theRetard]

because they have proportions that arent ideal?

so what are the ideal proportions? Greek statues were literally created according to polykleitos canon which is all about proportions

 

[foidletslayer]

ok then i'm also too lazy

you can only spam ad hominems.

You just made another claim, I ask too much of you but define and prove it is ad hominem, you can’t really because never have I ojce in this thread attacked you as a person while in discussion

I will repeat this: can you empirically prove that i need to prove something empirically:???

I will repeat myself, Your reasoning is circular and hypocritical enough for me not to contribute any further in this fruitless discussion

Bye bye

 

[theRetard]

You just made another claim, I ask too much of you but define and prove it is ad hominem, you can’t really because never have I ojce in this thread attacked you as a person while in discussion

I will repeat myself, Your reasoning is circular and hypocritical enough for me not to contribute any further in this fruitless discussion

Bye bye

>Too long you, you always do the same BS u know no one is bored enough to logically break down your claims and arguments but you also never do and then invoke burden of proof fallacy, your reasoning is circular enough for me to not argue further

not an ad hominem sure (JFL)
and where's my reasoning circular????

 

[Justakid]

jbw is still true

a white ltn will pull more than a indian one.

 

[theRetard]

jbw is still true

a white ltn will pull more than a indian one.

both are ugly who cares if someone pulls more

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

@Volksstaffel laugh at this retard with me
View attachment 4265048

Cope.

No birthrates for your IQ

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

so how can this bullshit disprove what i said? also if germans were actually smarter then their country wont became a fucking dictatorship

Whites still use pseudo science cope meanwhile their women lust for foreigners BBC’s and their birthrates dip and the whites are still enslaved by the Jews.

Truly if this is what being “high IQ” does then it’s G fucking G

 

[foidletslayer]

>Too long you, you always do the same BS u know no one is bored enough to logically break down your claims and arguments but you also never do and then invoke burden of proof fallacy, your reasoning is circular enough for me to not argue further

How was this a ad hominem? Are you not repetitive with invoking burden of proof?

If you read closely it wasn’t an insult, it was clearly describing a pattern you have been doing, also why do you straw man when in discussions?

 

[theRetard]

How was this a ad hominem? Are you not repetitive with invoking burden of proof?

If you read closely it wasn’t an insult, it was clearly describing a pattern you have been doing, also why do you straw man when in discussions?

ok, prove me empirically that i claimed somewhere that it was an insult.
Ad hominem=/=insult btw

 

[foidletslayer]

and where's my reasoning circular????

> you make a claim, don’t prove it. Make another claim & also don’t prove it go back to the initial claim & invoke the fallacy of burden of proof then ask of someone to prove their claims & you don’t

 

[foidletslayer]

ok, prove me empirically that i claimed somewhere that it was an insult.
Ad hominem=/=insult btw

Prove me ‘empirically’ that I was ad hominem where you claimed I was

 

[theRetard]

> you make a claim, don’t prove it. Make another claim & also don’t prove it go back to the initial claim & invoke the fallacy of burden of proof then ask of someone to prove their claims & you don’t

by proving something you literally meant empirical bullshit. I said that you must prove empirically that i need to prove something empirically. basically you are evading it because its logically impossible to prove deductive claim empirically. so you are wrong

 

[natelma0]

@Volksstaffel laugh at this retard with me
View attachment 4265048

i mean im black (west african) but you don't need snps to prove ts, just look at the state of every west african country lol

 

[theRetard]

Prove me ‘empirically’ that I was ad hominem where you claimed I was

why should I prove this empirically? why do you think I'm obligated to prove anything empirically? And it's even more logically impossible to empirically prove fuckign ad hominem JFL.
AGAIN, prove me EMPIRICALLY that i'm obligated to prove something EMPIRICALLY

 

[natelma0]

lmao even @_MVP_ has an 180 IQ, doesn't mean shit without the "creativity" genes

id rather have 180 iq and be talentless than be avg, like being 6'8 without being athletic

 

[foidletslayer]

ok, prove me empirically that i claimed somewhere that it was an insult.
Ad hominem=/=insult btw

Was eating but

A discussion where we both make similar claims is circular and unproductive, neither of us proves anything, yet we expect the other to respond in kind

 

[theRetard]

id rather have 180 iq and be talentless than be avg, like being 6'8 without being athletic

if you have 180iq then you can't be talentless by it's definition

 

[theRetard]

Was eating but

A discussion where we both make similar claims is circular and unproductive, neither of us proves anything, yet we expect the other to respond in kind

indeed, because empiricism is bullshit

 

[natelma0]

if you have 180iq then you can't be talentless by it's definition

in comparison to someone like bobby fischer you could have a lot less talent, at least i assume

 

[boneless.mutt64]

generic ad hominem

Fucking midwit that doesn't understand what @Nodesbitch was saying

 

[theRetard]

Fucking midwit that doesn't understand what @Nodesbitch was saying

one more ad hominem

 

[boneless.mutt64]

one more ad hominem

Learned all muh logical fallacies award

 

[theRetard]

Learned all muh logical fallacies award

ONE more ad hominem, here's your reward

 

[boneless.mutt64]

ONE more ad hominem, here's your reward

Thanks

 

[Justakid]

both are ugly who cares if someone pulls more

i guess? yeah ur right.

 

[foidletslayer]

indeed, because empiricism is bullshit

Was eating again but no shit nigga, I’ve been noticing that but please for the love of good god stop pulling out ur triumph card every time just have a regular discussion without being a reddit logician

 

[theRetard]

Was eating again but no shit nigga, I’ve been noticing that but please for the love of good god stop pulling out ur triumph card every time just have a regular discussion without being a reddit logician

View attachment 4265496

ad hominem champion

 

[foidletslayer]

Learned all muh logical fallacies award

Arguing with him is senseless because he coats himself with what he wants other to reciprocate with him

 

[theRetard]

Arguing with him is senseless because he coats himself with what he wants other to reciprocate with him

yeah it's senseless go read organon from aristotle to understand basics of fuckign debates.

 

[PEENO08]

Best way to tell if someone is low IQ is if they reject racial superiority. Asians are smart because they recognize whites as superior and try their hardest to be like them instead of coping like this shitskin

 

[theRetard]

Best way to tell if someone is low IQ is if they reject racial superiority. Asians are smart because they recognize whites as superior and try their hardest to be like them instead of coping like this shitskin

can you prove racial superiority somehow?

 

[foidletslayer]

ad hominem champion

Not a ad hominem, if it was backed with whay is called a observational fact

 

[theRetard]

Not a ad hominem, if it was backed with whay is called a observational fact

it's still an ad hominem

 

[foidletslayer]

it's still an ad hominem

It’s not entirely fallacious

 

[PEENO08]

can you prove racial superiority somehow?

Everyone wants to be white. Nobody wants to be Indian. If people were given a choice to choose their race, 100% of the world's population would be Nordic

 

[theRetard]

It’s not entirely fallacious

"it is just not entirely"

 

[foidletslayer]

yeah it's senseless go read organon from aristotle to understand basics of fuckign debates.

I already do, & I have read it a while ago when I was into anitok debates but this was fully ragebait