
They_are_all_whores
Apricot
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2024
- Posts
- 4,163
- Reputation
- 6,174
Idk what to say it sounds disgusting
“Lots of studies” one study. From 25 years ago. That was heavily criticized for its small sample size (80) men and over representation of self identified pedophiles (25% of participants). And the study didn’t correlate attraction: it correlated that men who could not control their arousal viewing porn would also be just as aroused viewing inappropriate porn as pedophiles (still ew: yes), NOT that most men found underage girls attractive.
A while ago an incel asked me to have my Scientist wife review the study referenced. She picked this “black pill science truth bomb” apart in less than 15 minutes.
Btw I am 14 so don't ban me mods

“Lots of studies” one study. From 25 years ago. That was heavily criticized for its small sample size (80) men and over representation of self identified pedophiles (25% of participants). And the study didn’t correlate attraction: it correlated that men who could not control their arousal viewing porn would also be just as aroused viewing inappropriate porn as pedophiles (still ew: yes), NOT that most men found underage girls attractive.
A while ago an incel asked me to have my Scientist wife review the study referenced. She picked this “black pill science truth bomb” apart in less than 15 minutes.
Btw I am 14 so don't ban me mods
Last edited: