Suffering and unfairness only exists within the emotional realm

JeanneDArcAlter

JeanneDArcAlter

الله أكبر
Joined
Nov 6, 2024
Posts
6,969
Reputation
8,927
In the physical world matter cannot be destroyed or created. In the emotional realm these abstract concepts cause unpaid for distress or joy. Stoicism does not cause a reversion of the mankinds balances to the physical worlds balances unless the joy or distress that is denied is isolated and not a product of a repayment in terms of karma.
@2025cel
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: wsada, fluxx and 2025cel
Suffering only exists in the realm we can conceive of too.
 
  • +1
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter
Suffering only exists in the realm we can conceive of too.
Of course reversion of the balances of all organisms to that of the tangible world is not desirable. We are trapped by our desires for joy from truly reaching balance
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2025cel
Of course reversion of the balances of all organisms to that of the tangible world is not desirable. We are trapped by our desires for joy from truly reaching balance
Exactly why we cannot comprehend the creator of the simulation.
Exactly why Christianity gets debunked so easily.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter
Exactly why we cannot comprehend the creator of the simulation.
Exactly why Christianity gets debunked so easily.
@PrinceLuenLeoncur
 
  • JFL
Reactions: 2025cel
In the physical world matter cnanot be destroyed or created. In the emotional realm these abstract concepts cause unpaid for distress or joy. Stoicism does not cause a reversion of the mankinds balances to the physical worlds balances unless the joy or distress that is denied is isolated and not a product of a repayment in terms of karma.
@2025cel
And by denying joy, i mean denying joy for the prospect of more joy in the future. Balance can never truly be reached by the means of the beings as variability will always mess it up.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2025cel
High iq bro high iq
 
  • +1
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter and 2025cel
@PrinceLuenLeoncur
The trinity exists so his point falls flat and is debunked by that alone

His view does work for Islam and Judaism though
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2025cel
His arguments don't apply to me, that's the problem.
It does your arguments are silly there’s a reason I laugh react your comments
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2025cel
I mean it doesn't work cause I change my pov every 5 secs
And that’s precisely why I said it’s silly :lul::lul::lul: you think I haven’t read your comments. There’s a reason why I don’t reply to them they Are of no substance
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2025cel
Inb4 a 70 page argument
His argument was retaeded though what he said unironically proved Christianity. Suffering pain etc all comes from this realm so his hypothesis fails before it gets off chrisitan theology Refutes it we Christian’s are lucky that the ancient Greeks became Christian and postured unshakable foolproof metaphysics and philosophy. Islam had shitskins so ofc their theology and philosophy would be full of Holes
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2025cel
His argument was retaeded though what he said unironically proved Christianity. Suffering pain etc all comes from this realm so his hypothesis fails before it gets off chrisitan theology Refutes it we Christian’s are lucky that the ancient Greeks became Christian and postured unshakable foolproof metaphysics and philosophy. Islam had shitskins so ofc their theology and philosophy would be full of Holes
Eh you are both not getting what i am talking about
I was saying something about why stoicism does not cause true reversion to 0 in terms of karma
 
  • JFL
Reactions: 2025cel
His argument was retaeded though what he said unironically proved Christianity. Suffering pain etc all comes from this realm so his hypothesis fails before it gets off chrisitan theology Refutes it we Christian’s are lucky that the ancient Greeks became Christian and postured unshakable foolproof metaphysics and philosophy. Islam had shitskins so ofc their theology and philosophy would be full of Holes
True, I don't really remember the arguments I made tho.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter
Eh you are both not getting what i am talking about
I was saying something about why stoicism does not cause true reversion to 0 in terms of karma
I have to admit, I don't really quite get what you're saying.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter
True, I don't really remember the arguments I made tho.
You made an argument similar to mine but yours was a generalisation of god stating that we can’t know him or anything because he isn’t connected to us

Essentially you can’t be immanent and transcendent at the same time (I agree) if you believing in one god this is a problem you cannot ignore

Thankfully the Christian trinity resolves this problem by making the son immanent whilst the father remains completely unknown (transcendent) and yet you can learn of the father through the son in the spirit but cannot fully know god in his complexity. This subway the try not even though it’s comples is the only theistic framework with no contradictions and holes
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2025cel
You made an argument similar to mine but yours was a generalisation of god stating that we can’t know him or anything because he isn’t connected to us

Essentially you can’t be immanent and transcendent at the same time (I agree) if you believing in one god this is a problem you cannot ignore

Thankfully the Christian trinity resolves this problem by making the son immanent whilst the father remains completely unknown (transcendent) and yet you can learn of the father through the son in the spirit but cannot fully know god in his complexity. This subway the try not even though it’s comples is the only theistic framework with no contradictions and holes
Yeah man, the thing is.
I cannot for the life of me trust those nerdy Greek translations.
 
Yeah man, the thing is.
I cannot for the life of me trust those nerdy Greek translations.
Well the ancient hebrews trusted the Septuigant. The New Testament was written in Greek

And even modern Jews will tell you the Maseretic and septuigant are both contextually saying the same thing


We have over 50k anyone bible manuscripts in multiple languages saying the same thing.
If the bible isn’t reliable academically then nothing is
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2025cel
You made an argument similar to mine but yours was a generalisation of god stating that we can’t know him or anything because he isn’t connected to us

Essentially you can’t be immanent and transcendent at the same time (I agree) if you believing in one god this is a problem you cannot ignore

Thankfully the Christian trinity resolves this problem by making the son immanent whilst the father remains completely unknown (transcendent) and yet you can learn of the father through the son in the spirit but cannot fully know god in his complexity. This subway the try not even though it’s comples is the only theistic framework with no contradictions and holes
Allah swt is transcendent and can relate to people at the same time. If you think this is a contradiction, and that its grounds for thinking Allah swt isnt real, then God doesnt exist in the first place as you would consider the rock paradox true as well since you consider contradiction is grounds for thinking God is not real
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2025cel
ts is too high iq for me
 
  • Woah
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter
In the physical world matter cannot be destroyed or created. In the emotional realm these abstract concepts cause unpaid for distress or joy. Stoicism does not cause a reversion of the mankinds balances to the physical worlds balances unless the joy or distress that is denied is isolated and not a product of a repayment in terms of karma.
@2025cel
stoicism is dead buddy
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur and JeanneDArcAlter
Allah swt is transcendent and can relate to people at the same time. If you think this is a contradiction, and that its grounds for thinking Allah swt isnt real, then God doesnt exist in the first place as you would consider the rock paradox true as well since you consider contradiction is grounds for thinking God is not real
If he’s transcendent then humans literally cannot know him. Your god isn’t multipersonal so there’s no way for him to be both.

Google what that word means before making yourself look retarded


Yes I’m saying Islamic god is false and not real. Non sequitur for imposing your presupposition on me, I don’t believe Allah is real he isn’t god it’s that simple. My god doesn’t have the same issue as yours :lul: my God is truly perfect so perfect that people have been trying to debunk my Religion for 2k years and everybody failed including your book which thinks Mary is a part of the trinity :lul::lul::lul:

The rock contradiction is something I can debunk and have done so before because Gods ability is the ability to act on anything with Potency, as god doesn’t have potency it would be a contradiction for him to change something into being lower than something that has 0 potency. God also sets the grounds for logic so god cannot create a square triangle for intent he a triangle.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: 2025cel
Everything humans have ever known only exists within the mental realm overall, I’d even say emotional too

Literally everything
 
Elaborate more on this(I'm not muslim)
Sura 5:116
And [beware the Day] when Allah will say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, 'Take me and my mother as deities besides Allah ?'

We don’t believe Mary is god :lul:

Sura 5:73

They have certainly disbelieved who say, "Allah is the third of three."


We don’t believe there’s any particians in the trinity
 
  • JFL
Reactions: 2025cel
Sura 5:116
And [beware the Day] when Allah will say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, 'Take me and my mother as deities besides Allah ?'

We don’t believe Mary is god :lul:

Sura 5:73

They have certainly disbelieved who say, "Allah is the third of three."


We don’t believe there’s any particians in the trinity
Yeah that's retarded
 
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur
Everything humans have ever known only exists within the mental realm overall, I’d even say emotional too

Literally everything
It’s Allah himself :soy: 😳😳😳😳🤯 Allah Subhanahu wa ta'ala (SWT) don’t destroy me plz I’m sorry :feelswah::feelswah::feelswah::feelswah:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: 2025cel
Yeah that's retarded
Remember Quran says sura 12:111 says the Quran is a book that "explains EVERYTHING fully in detail"

And that

Sura 4:82 "If [Quran] had been from other than Allah, they would have found within it much contradiction"​


🤷‍♂️
 
  • JFL
Reactions: 2025cel
If he’s transcendent then humans literally cannot know him. Your god isn’t multipersonal so there’s no way for him to be both.

Google what that word means before making yourself look retarded


Yes I’m saying Islamic god is false and not real. Non sequitur for imposing your presupposition on me, I don’t believe Allah is real he isn’t god it’s that simple. My god doesn’t have the same issue as yours :lul: my God is truly perfect so perfect that people have been trying to debunk my Religion for 2k years and everybody failed including your book which thinks Mary is a part of the trinity :lul::lul::lul:

The rock contradiction is something I can debunk and have done so before because Gods ability is the ability to act on anything with Potency, as god doesn’t have potency it would be a contradiction for him to change something into being lower than something that has 0 potency. God also sets the grounds for logic so god cannot create a square triangle for intent he a triangle.
Your missing my point mate
 

Similar threads

MaghrebGator
Replies
115
Views
7K
subcel45
subcel45
dreamcake1mo
Replies
116
Views
33K
LLsurgeryEnthusiast
LLsurgeryEnthusiast

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top