Survey: Height and lay count

[far336]

Bump

 

[Deleted member 5683]

5'10.5 / 179 cm
0 lays

 

[far336]

Bump

 

[Deleted member 5927]

"6 psl"

 

[hairyballscel]

5'8
7 lays (only 3 were actual sex)
17 years old

 

[far336]

Bump

 

[GigaMog]

The purpose of this thread is to gather data to see what height results in the highest lay count.

Use this to measure your height: https://www.wikihow.com/Measure-Your-Height-by-Yourself

Note about lay count:

• Lay count includes a scenario where a female (not male) touches your genitals on purpose. For example, vaginal sex, handjob, blowjob, anal, etc.
• Physical check ups by doctors don't count.
• Lay count from paid acts do not count. For example, having sex with prostitutes or escorts don't count.
• Lays from same female only counts as one lay. For example, if you've laid the same girl 500 times, that counts as one lay.
• If more than one new female participates in this act at the same time, then that counts as multiple lays. For example, a threesome with two new females counts as 2 lays.

What you need to do: Post your height and lay count, with honesty. Any strange reports will be ignored (height 1'0, 10000 lays) Please avoid posting anything irrelevant. If you have a comment or question, then PM me instead.

I'll gather the data and present it in graphical form in a new thread on June 1, 2020. I'll provide a link to it in this thread.

I appreciate your participation in this survey

Other surveys like this:
View attachment 405931
Source: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1056&context=psychology_articles

View attachment 405920
Source: https://www.thesun.co.uk/living/135...his-is-how-your-height-affects-your-sex-life/

View attachment 405927
Source: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/09/150929142252.htm

Tag me when you post your results please

 

[Deleted member 3853]

6'0, 0

 

[entrenador]

yeah lets just totally ignore age which makes a monumental difference here. I mean my main takeaway from all the guys reporting such low numbers here isnt that you're a bunch of midgets its that you're a bunch of 14yos

 

[far336]

yeah lets just totally ignore age which makes a monumental difference here. I mean my main takeaway from all the guys reporting such low numbers here isnt that you're a bunch of midgets its that you're a bunch of 14yos

I do agree that age is a factor in lay count. Usually, a 30 year old has a higher lay count than a 14 year old. However, on average, a 6'0 male would have a higher lay count than a 5'0 male, whether that's at 14 or 30 years old. With enough people reporting, we will see a trend on which height, on average, has the highest lay count, at any age.

 

[Dutcher]

6'0 3 girls touched my pp

 

[entrenador]

I do agree that age is a factor in lay count. Usually, a 30 year old has a higher lay count than a 14 year old. However, on average, a 6'0 male would have a higher lay count than a 5'0 male, whether that's at 14 or 30 years old. With enough people reporting, we will see a trend on which height, on average, has the highest lay count, at any age.

sure, but any data you get would be fairly skewed by the youngcels. I mean it would not be too hard to ask people to report their age as well going forward and stratify with that, if you end up not having enough data points at the end you can of course merge the groups but IMO age is just too big of a factor to not even attempt to account for

 

[far336]

sure, but any data you get would be fairly skewed by the youngcels.

I see what you're saying. Suppose this forum is only composed of 14 year olds. Also, suppose that this is the data reported:

5'0 - 0.0 average lays
5'5 - 0.5 average lays
6'0 -1.5 average lays
6'5 - 1.0 average lays

Do you think this data would have been significantly different if instead of 14 year olds, all of them were 30 year olds instead?

I mean it would not be too hard to ask people to report their age as well going forward and stratify with that, if you end up not having enough data points at the end you can of course merge the groups but IMO age is just too big of a factor to not even attempt to account for

This is good in theory, but because this forum has age range of 14 to 40 year olds, I'd have to have 26 different graphs and I don't think the sample size would be enough for each age group because there is not enough users on this forum.

I appreciate the time you took to provide feedback

 

[Tyronecell]

6'2
O lay count

 

[Deleted member 1560]

5'9 1 lay

 

[Baldingman1998]

6'2 fucked 1 girl like 5 times. 21 yo

 

[entrenador]

I see what you're saying. Suppose this forum is only composed of 14 year olds. Also, suppose that this is the data reported:

5'0 - 0.0 average lays
5'5 - 0.5 average lays
6'0 -1.5 average lays
6'5 - 1.0 average lays

Do you think this data would have been significantly different if instead of 14 year olds, all of them were 30 year olds instead?


This is good in theory, but because this forum has age range of 14 to 40 year olds, I'd have to have 26 different graphs and I don't think the sample size would be enough for each age group because there is not enough users on this forum.

I appreciate the time you took to provide feedback

I was thinking more along the lines of age categories, like <18, 18-24, 25+. I suspect the group of most interest is the 18-24

 

[far336]

I was thinking more along the lines of age categories, like <18, 18-24, 25+. I suspect the group of most interest is the 18-24

That's a good idea. Unfortunately, it's a little late for me to ask about age. If I do this again in the future, I will ask for age as well.

 

[Deleted member 6045]

6’2 and ig 150-200

 

[Subhuman trash]

6’0 0 (am truecel tbh)

 

[entrenador]

That's a good idea. Unfortunately, it's a little late for me to ask about age. If I do this again in the future, I will ask for age as well.

Cool, cheers for considering my sugestion with level headed discussion anyways

I suppose I'll contribute, caveat being I have NO idea what my count is under the definition given in OP as I've only ever kept track of full lays.. so feel free to disregard.

6'1"/18 for me. Bigger number than most commenters ITT even though I spent most of my adult life so far in long term relationships, with occasional sloot binges here and there. See why I was making such a fuss about age? LOL. Don't want to give away my exact age but I'm on the earlier side of mid 20s

 

[Dog face]

6'0"/ 0 lays. it's ogre

 

[Callipygian]

188
2

 

[Deleted member 7033]

5'10 21 year old
10 times with same girl
, 2nd base with another 8 girls but didn't went more forward .

 

[far336]

Bump

 

[Zayn2.0]

5'8, 157. Yes i have a problem.

 

[far336]

5'8, 157. Yes i have a problem.

Yeah, that's a problem! Why isn't it higher?

 

[Zayn2.0]

Yeah, that's a problem! Why isn't it higher?

Lmao you're right man. Maybe if i was a point hotter

 

[far336]

Maybe if i was a point hotter

You should really do something about that. Have you tried increasing the thermostat at your house?

 

[Zayn2.0]

You should really do something about that. Have you tried increasing the thermostat at your house?

Yeah i notice my results are better at 77 verses 74. Fuck i should really increase it again

 

[Over]

5'10, KHHV

 

[Germania]

5'10" and only 36 lays, because I was in relationships most of the time

 

[Deleted member 6873]

5'8 and 0 lays

 

[Germania]

friend of me
5'8" 100+ Lays

 

[Deleted member 6873]

friend of me
5'8" 100+ Lays

Mirin

 

[Over]

friend of me
5'8" 100+ Lays

Friend of mine 5'7 200²⁰+ Lays

 

[Deleted member 4464]

View attachment 420868

Friend of mine 5'7 200²⁰+ Lays

I know a 5'2 balding janitor with 500+ lays

 

[Captain_Collagen]

5'10 30 yo

Don't know the exact # but over 70 when I tried to work it out a while back

About half were ugly so doesn't count. Some hot ones too though tbh

 

[far336]

Bump

 

[the_german2003]

6.2 , 17 years and no lays. Could have fucked a couple of girls tho

 

[HighIQcel]

6'2 0 lays

 

[Romnel]

5'10.5(179cm) - 1

 

[Patrick Baitman]

6'3 barefoot, in the evening, 2

 

[Romnel]

This is a bit flawed though because at either end (short and tall) the results will be very unreliable due to almost everyone being 5'9/5'11

 

[Lorsss]

height: 179cm, measured by a doctor
lay count: one fat girl
age: 22

 

[Deleted member 6908]

Height: 5'8
Age: 28
Count: 16
PS: Most were late teens, early 20s.

5'8

z e r o

mentalcelmaxxing.

Is that you in your avvy?

 

[Deleted member 756]

6’2
13 lays
24 years old

 

[Deleted member 6908]

6’3 3 lays

Didn't you say you had chad aesthetics the other time?

How old are you?

 

[Deleted member 1751]

5'11 , 23, coming from a conservative country virgin

 

[Deleted member 6908]

yeah lets just totally ignore age which makes a monumental difference here. I mean my main takeaway from all the guys reporting such low numbers here isnt that you're a bunch of midgets its that you're a bunch of 14yos

Age should be considered.

OP should edit his post if he wants to delve into nuance and not fall victim to stupid confirmation bias and mindless data analysis which lacks context. To not even consider age, while asking about height, in a survey, is pure sign of pseudo-intellectualism.