Discussion Tall gymmaxed HTNs are insane slayers, here is why

nitesik

nitesik

Kraken
Joined
Mar 4, 2022
Posts
3,623
Reputation
4,662
Its all about the amount of guys who have all 3. Height above 6'1, face 70th percentile, and good body. I am not even counting that most of guys above 6'1 have bad frame genetics, lets assume every one of them can attain top tier body. Around 1/6 guys go to gym actively(most of them fuck around but lets not count that).

Lets do some math 6'1 height is top 12%, HTN is top 30%, and 17% of guys have good body.

0.12 * 0.3 * 0.17 = 0.6%

ONLY
0.6% of guys hit all of this

At this point being tall gymmaxed Chadlite or even chad is literally an anomaly, most of females dont encounter guys like that outside of tinder.

Whats your thoughts boyos
 
Bonesbonesbonesbone

Bonesbonesbonesbone

Fuchsia
Joined
Mar 28, 2022
Posts
10,195
Reputation
8,359
It's legit tbh. not about having one very good component like a chad face but overall you should be the top 10% as whole and not as one.

Good example is David laid who is 6"2 tall, HTN face and a good body

1660806947199
 
R

ROTTING

Platinum
Joined
Sep 25, 2021
Posts
1,132
Reputation
2,198
Yeah, I dislike the part of blackpill where people say that tall chad gets all girls, but tall chads are like 0.00001%, in reality slayers are HTN's
Yeah, tall HTNs slay.
But at Chadlite/Chad tier, you don't really need a good frame and a gigatall height to slay. Just don't be framecel, manletcel, autismcel, etc.
 
Bonesbonesbonesbone

Bonesbonesbonesbone

Fuchsia
Joined
Mar 28, 2022
Posts
10,195
Reputation
8,359
cope

David laid clean shaven is a chad, also 6’3 and good frame mogs any htn
if hes chad then jeff seid is over giga chad level
 
nitesik

nitesik

Kraken
Joined
Mar 4, 2022
Posts
3,623
Reputation
4,662
Just be tall and good looking and good frame

:feelsuhh:
Its actually lifefuel. Top 30% face is achievable through softmaxxing for most of guys, maybe through hardmaxxing. Good frame is achievable for 90% of guys as well. Maybe you dont have 6'1 height but if you have all of this at shorter height its top 5% anyways, unless you are 5'5 or something
 
TeenAscender

TeenAscender

Banned
Joined
Oct 20, 2021
Posts
4,937
Reputation
6,143
Its actually lifefuel. Top 30% face is achievable through softmaxxing for most of guys, maybe through hardmaxxing. Good frame is achievable for 90% of guys as well. Maybe you dont have 6'1 height but if you have all of this at shorter height its top 5% anyways, unless you are 5'5 or something
nah I got the height and frame but the thing is the overwhelming majority of people dont have the height, let alone htn face and good frame.

Like the only times I see a legit 6'1+ good looking wide guy is at the gym or maybe a chad at a party but its quite rare
 
Bonesbonesbonesbone

Bonesbonesbonesbone

Fuchsia
Joined
Mar 28, 2022
Posts
10,195
Reputation
8,359
Jeff seid is the htn at most
bro stop trolling jeff seid is a chadlite facially and laid is a htn facially speaking too u overrate tbh
1660807188272
 
nitesik

nitesik

Kraken
Joined
Mar 4, 2022
Posts
3,623
Reputation
4,662
It's legit tbh. not about having one very good component like a chad face but overall you should be the top 10% as whole and not as one.

Good example is David laid who is 6"2 tall, HTN face and a good body

View attachment 1827283
I agree about components. I didnt even count any other stuff like money, NT, social status etc. If you somehow get most of this, basically there will be no competition at all
 
LightSkinNoob

LightSkinNoob

GFmaxxed and ascended
Joined
Nov 18, 2021
Posts
5,089
Reputation
9,419
TFW when you have all the above and are incel af, I’d say only weak HTN, Chadlite is the true cut off.
 
TeenAscender

TeenAscender

Banned
Joined
Oct 20, 2021
Posts
4,937
Reputation
6,143
I used to have this mindset and made a thread very similar to this a while back, but then I realized that an unfrauded barefoot afternoon 6'1+ is only 1 in 10 young men (rarer than it sounds), most of yall are estrogenic 6 inch wristcels (bad frame/starting androgenicity), and if you are on this forum chances are you dont fall into the top 10% of facial aesthetics.

Just take a bunch of seemingly common traits which are actually uncommon, and group them together :unsure:
 
nitesik

nitesik

Kraken
Joined
Mar 4, 2022
Posts
3,623
Reputation
4,662
nah I got the height and frame but the thing is the overwhelming majority of people dont have the height, let alone htn face and good frame.

Like the only times I see a legit 6'1+ good looking wide guy is at the gym or maybe a chad at a party but its quite rare
Yeah. But its possible to surgerymaxx(softmaxx in most cases) to HTN for majority of normies.

You can get a good frame as well.

If you are average or above in height and have everything else, its top 5% anyways
 
TeenAscender

TeenAscender

Banned
Joined
Oct 20, 2021
Posts
4,937
Reputation
6,143
Yeah. But its possible to surgerymaxx(softmaxx in most cases) to HTN for majority of normies.

You can get a good frame as well.

If you are average or above in height and have everything else, its top 5% anyways
also this formula u use doesnt factor in the fact that being good looking in the face > height >>> frame/muscle rather it treats those 3 as equals

edit: but yeah i agree with the premise that HTN is the minimum and not chadlite or chad. If you think you need to be chad in 2022 to slay then your sense of looks gauging is fucked
 
D

Deleted member 21532

6'4 mogger kid.
Joined
Aug 16, 2022
Posts
2,292
Reputation
2,208
let's see if that is the case because I am about to start uni soon and I have all that you mentioned.
 
nitesik

nitesik

Kraken
Joined
Mar 4, 2022
Posts
3,623
Reputation
4,662
let's see if that the case because I am about to start uni soon and I have all that you mentioned.
The odds are it wont work if you are aspie
 
D

Deleted member 19294

Put the fork down, son
Joined
Apr 28, 2022
Posts
1,781
Reputation
2,140
Women look at the full picture... they evaluate face, height, frame/muscles in that order
 
Foreverbrad

Foreverbrad

Eat Clen Tren Hard
Joined
Aug 23, 2021
Posts
14,652
Reputation
21,624
Lets do some math 6'1 height is top 12%, HTN is top 30%, and 17% of guys have good body.

0.12 * 0.3 * 0.17 = 0.6%

You can't just multiply them like that because they are not independent traits.

Most of the time they go together and can simply be described as "good genetics".

I think a better approach is to consider your attractiveness level as equal to your lowest percentile out of all the factors involved.

This still results in your hypothetical dude being a slayer because he is solidly high ranked in all categories.

Take away any of them and he will no longer slay, but equally upgrading any of them won't cause a significant improvement because he has no (comparative) failos.
 
nitesik

nitesik

Kraken
Joined
Mar 4, 2022
Posts
3,623
Reputation
4,662
You can't just multiply them like that because they are not independent traits.

Most of the time they go together and can simply be described as "good genetics".

I think a better approach is to consider your attractiveness level as equal to your lowest percentile out of all the factors involved.

This still results in your hypothetical dude being a slayer because he is solidly high ranked in all categories.

Take away any of them and he will no longer slay, but equally upgrading any of them won't cause a significant improvement because he has no (comparative) failos.
Thats actually interesting thoughts.

I disagree that they come in packages. Majority of tall guys have elongated face and worse frame, comparing to shorter guys.
 
B

BeenLMSsinceMSN

Mistral
Joined
Jun 20, 2021
Posts
2,007
Reputation
2,394
Its all about the amount of guys who have all 3. Height above 6'1, face 70th percentile, and good body. I am not even counting that most of guys above 6'1 have bad frame genetics, lets assume every one of them can attain top tier body. Around 1/6 guys go to gym actively(most of them fuck around but lets not count that).

Lets do some math 6'1 height is top 12%, HTN is top 30%, and 17% of guys have good body.

0.12 * 0.3 * 0.17 = 0.6%

ONLY
0.6% of guys hit all of this

At this point being tall gymmaxed Chadlite or even chad is literally an anomaly, most of females dont encounter guys like that outside of tinder.

Whats your thoughts boyos
Not enough to slay on online dating though
 
D

Deleted member 22924

The king of org
Joined
Oct 9, 2022
Posts
11,249
Reputation
14,175
L

Lawton88

Luminary
Joined
Apr 28, 2021
Posts
5,014
Reputation
4,487
Its all about the amount of guys who have all 3. Height above 6'1, face 70th percentile, and good body. I am not even counting that most of guys above 6'1 have bad frame genetics, lets assume every one of them can attain top tier body. Around 1/6 guys go to gym actively(most of them fuck around but lets not count that).

Lets do some math 6'1 height is top 12%, HTN is top 30%, and 17% of guys have good body.

0.12 * 0.3 * 0.17 = 0.6%

ONLY
0.6% of guys hit all of this

At this point being tall gymmaxed Chadlite or even chad is literally an anomaly, most of females dont encounter guys like that outside of tinder.

Whats your thoughts boyos

But a lot more than that have those things at clubs, OLD and social media etc.
 
stewiegriffin

stewiegriffin

Hold my dick mfs
Joined
Nov 24, 2020
Posts
1,882
Reputation
2,443
6’5

Prob 70 percentile face

Shit clavicles. And 190lbs

Have a girlfriend… but I was never a “slayer”. Only had ugly girls approach me for the most part. I think you really need frame with the height for it to make girls lust over you
 
longjohnmong

longjohnmong

Fuchsia
Joined
Nov 11, 2022
Posts
10,551
Reputation
11,863
Its actually lifefuel. Top 30% face is achievable through softmaxxing for most of guys, maybe through hardmaxxing. Good frame is achievable for 90% of guys as well. Maybe you dont have 6'1 height but if you have all of this at shorter height its top 5% anyways, unless you are 5'5 or something
too bad top 30% face is not HTN. 84% of dudes are below one standard deviation above the mean, assuming normal distribution, which is best case scenario. that would be like MTN, LTN, and subhuman. so HTN is at least top 16%.
 
justadude

justadude

Luminary
Joined
Apr 8, 2020
Posts
8,314
Reputation
14,598
u aren't putting enough emphasis on face, yea a tall gymaxed htn might be rare, but the face matters more than height and body. an average height and body chadlite would mog unfortunately
 
TeenAscender

TeenAscender

Banned
Joined
Oct 20, 2021
Posts
4,937
Reputation
6,143
it aint that tall, more like 6'3+, girls wouldnt call you tall at 6'1
Girls will call you tall at 6’1. I’m not a legit 6’1 absolute low height yet but I have a friend who is and he’s always asked by girls how tall he is. A 5’11 girl even asked tall he was. Low 6’1 = same height as Logan Paul, cr7, David Gandy, Shawn mendes who are all objectively tall guys who get characterized as tall by the media

It’s more so 6’3+ unfrauded barefoot low is the minimum height to be called tall by other average-above average height guys
 
D

Deleted member 22924

The king of org
Joined
Oct 9, 2022
Posts
11,249
Reputation
14,175
6'7 bodybuilder chad or death stop copping
 
D

Deleted member 19865

"But why... Is that all I'm worth?"
Joined
May 26, 2022
Posts
1,803
Reputation
1,799
I agree. I see a lot of fit tall htns at the gym with very high quality gfs. Also see a lot of BBCs there with top tier girls as well. Even witnessed BBCs approaching and picking up white gymthots lmao.
 
D

Deleted member 23286

Schizo
Joined
Oct 24, 2022
Posts
9,863
Reputation
15,151
I really do need to get toned, you're right mate.
 
nitesik

nitesik

Kraken
Joined
Mar 4, 2022
Posts
3,623
Reputation
4,662
too bad top 30% face is not HTN. 84% of dudes are below one standard deviation above the mean, assuming normal distribution, which is best case scenario. that would be like MTN, LTN, and subhuman. so HTN is at least top 16%.
Doesnt matter its not the main point. You can think of 30% face not HTN if you want
 

Similar threads

zenserenity
Replies
6
Views
64
thegrey831
thegrey831
6”3neartyronelite
Replies
10
Views
82
Cheat_Win
C
Tttopgtoni
Replies
6
Views
49
kingmidas122
kingmidas122
killuax01
Replies
35
Views
356
manuel355335
M
Sub->CL
Replies
6
Views
78
Sub->CL
Sub->CL

Users who are viewing this thread

Top