testing the waters here regarding the gay/trap rule : come at me mods

Wizard32

Wizard32

Iron
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Posts
126
Reputation
221
Given that incels.is banned me for voicing these opinions, I am interested in knowing upfront before I open my heart to getting fond for this place, whether or not I will be similarly punished for stating those opinions here.

The argument that got me banned is essentially that since you can choose whether or not to have sex with people you're not attracted to, that choosing not to have sex with people you are not attracted to is a form of situational voluntary celibacy.

I do not it makes for overall voluntary celibacy (because you are not voluntarily celibate to those you ARE attracted to) but TBH the concept of overall volcel also seems like coping LARP by guys who just don't want to confront the idea that they are incel regarding the shrinking group of girls who meet their standards.

What got me banned is that I said this applied not just to females you weren't attracted to (the superobese, non-humans like dogs/sheep/gators) but also males.

I'm not really sure what's controversial about acknowledging that our situational celibacy in regard to those who repulse us is a voluntary choice. It appears the term "voluntary" has such a bad rep that people react to it like a condemnation, but I believe in embracing the idea of us having voluntary agency in rejecting certain unsuitable partners or situations.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Won't Stop Mewing

 
  • +1
Reactions: mogstar and Hozay
I just got rekt
 
  • +1
Reactions: Won't Stop Mewing
The reason that this argument isn’t accepted is because many here and on co do not consider homosexual relations to be a legitimate form of sex. You are trying to catch 22 incels into either deluding themselves into committing sinful acts or delegitimizing the struggle of being incel. For what purpose?

also, @knajjd
 
JMax you are correct about that approach and I actually addressed that in the thread I was banned for, if you want I'll point it out to you.

I did say that we could define sex in the classical terms of "vaginas only" but that would also mean if we considered anal/oral with men to be non-sex we must also consider anal/oral with foids to be non-sex as well: but obviously we do not think that way because we consider guys who get BJs/anal from foids (even if no PIV) to be non-celibates.

I had seen arguments like "gays are rarely incels because it's easy for them to get sex" which also shows we acknowledge that to be sex, just that they can't understand our struggles as much because it's harder for us to get sex with those we want to fuck than it is for them.

I'm not understanding what catch 22 you're referring to here, this needs to be spelled out for me.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Won't Stop Mewing
Wizard32
Trainee

JoinedDec 28, 2018Posts26Reputation11Time online3h 24m
 
you have a post saying "He's starting to look more feminine... I could settle for that if I were in prison."

you ARE, in practice, in prison; you're an incel. you have no access to any female who wants to have sex with you, just like the people in prison (unless you do, and you were only pretending to be incel). so, your post can be translated to: "I'd be OK with having sex with certain males", which means that you're gay.

what i'm trying to say is that this post has no doubt severely contributed to your permaban. you should have stopped posting this sort of stuff after your first and second warnings.
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: JimmyDreamsOfZygos, Warlow, mogstar and 1 other person
Yes, I registered for this place shortly afte rI heard about it on .co but tbh that place appealed more at time due to venting and feeling hopeless about maxing possibilities
 
  • +1
Reactions: Won't Stop Mewing
you have a post saying "He's starting to look more feminine... I could settle for that if I were in prison."
That was just trolling, get over it.

your post can be translated to: "I'd be OK with having sex with certain males", which means that you're gay.
I can't even find the thread I was replying to, mods obviously deleted it because it was a shitposting thread, so you can't take anything there seriously. That shooter guy can't possibly pass for a foid so there's no way I could get trapped.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Won't Stop Mewing
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Hozay
That was just trolling, get over it.


I can't even find the thread I was replying to, mods obviously deleted it because it was a shitposting thread, so you can't take anything there seriously. That shooter guy can't possibly pass for a foid so there's no way I could get trapped.
"i was just trolling" is not a defense. you can go now.

as for your question in the OP, if you post anything like the post that i've quoted, you certainly will get warned here as well. the rules here are pretty similar to the ones over there.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • Love it
Reactions: JimmyDreamsOfZygos, Lorsss and Deleted member 3323
"i was just trolling" is not a defense. you can go now.

as for your question in the OP, if you post anything like the post that i've quoted, you certainly will get warned here as well. the rules here are pretty similar to the ones over there.
stop flirting with him faggot
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 9003
@knajjd he just forgot to say no homo it’s okay
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 5634
"i was just trolling" is not a defense. you can go now.
That's my best approximation of a motive as this is going back a ways.

My standards are too high to be srs about that.

as for your question in the OP, if you post anything like the post that i've quoted, you certainly will get warned here as well. the rules here are pretty similar to the ones over there.
The mod overlap is worrying in the potential for using either as an outlet to hold the other accountable, ngl

dnt read lol
any time you disrespect me I will post lolis

sample_c16739fd62881abc9114dfb901ed5b42.jpg
 
  • +1
Reactions: Won't Stop Mewing
"i was just trolling" is not a defense. you can go now.

as for your question in the OP, if you post anything like the post that i've quoted, you certainly will get warned here as well. the rules here are pretty similar to the ones over there.
you're a good kid knajjd
 
That's my best approximation of a motive as this is going back a ways.

My standards are too high to be srs about that.


The mod overlap is worrying in the potential for using either as an outlet to hold the other accountable, ngl


any time you disrespect me I will post lolis

sample_c16739fd62881abc9114dfb901ed5b42.jpg
make a mega thread bro, and be sure not to tag me
 
The absurdity here is if I were actually gay I would not be a wizard. I would not have to go far to find a place catering to that in a nearby metropolis. I feel like a bunch of non-virgins are lecturing me to compensate for their own impurities.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Won't Stop Mewing
"i was just trolling" is not a defense. you can go now.

as for your question in the OP, if you post anything like the post that i've quoted, you certainly will get warned here as well. the rules here are pretty similar to the ones over there.
So true :love::love::love:
 
"i was just trolling" is not a defense. you can go now.

as for your question in the OP, if you post anything like the post that i've quoted, you certainly will get warned here as well. the rules here are pretty similar to the ones over there.
Every Turkish "Male" Is A Dirty FemBoy Faggot. It's Just The Truth.
@knajjd Is Gonna Take Her Estrogen Pills And Let LooksMaxx Users DESTROY Her AssHole.
2b5303bc4fb594ef6dbdf388fa98b1ec.jpg

^ @knajjd 's REAL Picture.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 14854

Similar threads

turneywest
Replies
139
Views
2K
loyolaxavvierretard
loyolaxavvierretard
RapeAllFemales
Replies
22
Views
1K
vietcel
vietcel
134applesauce456
Replies
31
Views
398
Latinolooksmaxxer
Latinolooksmaxxer
P
Replies
17
Views
485
valentine
valentine
got.daim
Discussion About pedophilia
Replies
32
Views
1K
bakpaokukus
bakpaokukus

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top