sick kunt31
I Am The God of the New World!
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2025
- Posts
- 12,488
- Reputation
- 13,248
@Ghost Philosophy
I'm surprised I thought you were a teacher
wouldn't a teacher do anything to defend his students/kids
you guys twist words and meanings
this is child pornography plain and simple
"even Indirectly suggesting sexual activity or involving explicit themes (like bestiality or sexual innuendo) with a minor qualifies as sexual exploitation under U.S. law. The intent and context matter, not just whether the act is explicit.
U.S. Law (18 U.S. Code § 2256) doesn’t just focus on explicit sex acts. If the minor is sexualized or depicted in a sexual context, it qualifies as CHILD PORN
come on you guys are going to defend literally child pornography
just because you don't like me
I might be in the wrong
but I was emotional and scared
I'm still growing like all of us
and I'm stating my truth
I wont back down the truth
even if its me vs ALL of you
I know that's in the wrong
and I know I would help someone like me
Sincerely-me
I'm surprised I thought you were a teacher
wouldn't a teacher do anything to defend his students/kids
you guys twist words and meanings
this is child pornography plain and simple
"even Indirectly suggesting sexual activity or involving explicit themes (like bestiality or sexual innuendo) with a minor qualifies as sexual exploitation under U.S. law. The intent and context matter, not just whether the act is explicit.
U.S. Law (18 U.S. Code § 2256) doesn’t just focus on explicit sex acts. If the minor is sexualized or depicted in a sexual context, it qualifies as CHILD PORN
come on you guys are going to defend literally child pornography
just because you don't like me
I might be in the wrong
but I was emotional and scared
I'm still growing like all of us
and I'm stating my truth
I wont back down the truth
even if its me vs ALL of you
I know that's in the wrong
and I know I would help someone like me
Sincerely-me


