The bible belt was right. People can't be moral without religion

[disillusioned]

For the record I am not a creationist or some bullshit like that, but fact is that the point religious conservatives use to make about how society can't function without religion appears to be have been largely justified. Look at the western world pre-1950's (era of conservatism and greater good) and then compare it to the western world post-1950's (era of liberalism and individualism)....

Fact is, without any collective moral principles humans are reduced to little more than savage animals driven only by their greed and base instincts. Almost everything the bible belt said would happen if religion was abandoned has now either happened or is already happening. All the while muslims are the fastest growing demographic in the world except maybe for Africans (whom are so dumb they just breed cus lol penis in vagina).

Individualism is a failed ideology. Society can't function with a religion.

 

[reptiles]

For the record I am not a creationist or some bullshit like that, but fact is that the point religious conservatives use to make about how society can't function without religion appears to be have been largely justified. Look at the western world pre-1950's (era of conservatism and greater good) and then compare it to the western world post-1950's (era of liberalism and individualism)....

Fact is, without any collective moral principles humans are reduced to little more than savage animals driven only by their greed and base instincts. Almost everything the bible belt said would happen if religion was abandoned has now either happened or is already happening. All the while muslims are the fastest growing demographic in the world except maybe for Africans (whom are so dumb they just breed cus lol penis in vagina).

Individualism is a failed ideology. Society can't function with a religion.

Disagree hugely things are better today than its ever been it will get worse cause ultimately we live in a world filled with elites but for right know this is the best time to be around period

 

[Krezo]

Morality is meaningless

 

[Deleted member 656]

For the record I am not a creationist or some bullshit like that, but fact is that the point religious conservatives use to make about how society can't function without religion appears to be have been largely justified. Look at the western world pre-1950's (era of conservatism and greater good) and then compare it to the western world post-1950's (era of liberalism and individualism)....

Fact is, without any collective moral principles humans are reduced to little more than savage animals driven only by their greed and base instincts. Almost everything the bible belt said would happen if religion was abandoned has now either happened or is already happening. All the while muslims are the fastest growing demographic in the world except maybe for Africans (whom are so dumb they just breed cus lol penis in vagina).

Individualism is a failed ideology. Society can't function with a religion.

The unprecedented contradiction infuriated Goebbels. He dropped the mask. "The German people? What can you do with a people whose men are no longer willing to fight when their wives are being raped? All the plans of National Socialism, all its dreams and goals, were too great and too noble for this people. The German people are just too cowardly to realize these goals. In the east, they are running away. In the west, they set up hindrances for their own soldiers and welcome the enemy with white flags. The German people deserve the destiny that now awaits them."

 

[Cali Yuga]

just become christian its easy

 

[Dogs]

I agree with this post of yours

 

[Roping Subhuman]

The unprecedented contradiction infuriated Goebbels. He dropped the mask. "The German people? What can you do with a people whose men are no longer willing to fight when their wives are being raped? All the plans of National Socialism, all its dreams and goals, were too great and too noble for this people. The German people are just too cowardly to realize these goals. In the east, they are running away. In the west, they set up hindrances for their own soldiers and welcome the enemy with white flags. The German people deserve the destiny that now awaits them."

JFL did he actually say that? Germans fought till the bitter end during WW2. Goebbels saying something like that doesn't really make much sense to me.

 

[Deleted member 656]

JFL did he actually say that? Germans fought till the bitter end during WW2. Goebbels saying something like that doesn't really make much sense to me.

Some of them did. A lot of them didn't.

 

[Chadelite]

Allah is the Lord of the worlds

 

[Dude420]

Laws enforcement and social stigmas make people somewhat moral.

 

[Roping Subhuman]

Some of them did. A lot of them didn't.

By 'some' you mean Millions of German Men?

 

[Deleted member 656]

By 'some' you mean Millions of German Men?

Yeah

 

[reptiles]

The unprecedented contradiction infuriated Goebbels. He dropped the mask. "The German people? What can you do with a people whose men are no longer willing to fight when their wives are being raped? All the plans of National Socialism, all its dreams and goals, were too great and too noble for this people. The German people are just too cowardly to realize these goals. In the east, they are running away. In the west, they set up hindrances for their own soldiers and welcome the enemy with white flags. The German people deserve the destiny that now awaits them."

Then he really would have hated Kurt godel than

 

[Krezo]

Moral statements are neither analytic nor empirically verifiable therefore they are meaningless.

 

[Roping Subhuman]

Yeah

JFL then why did you say a lot of them didn't?

 

[Jagged0]

Your morals come from centuries of religious brainwashing just lol at you thinking this is some high iq thinking at the end of the days we’re mammals who desire to mate

 

[Deleted member 656]

JFL then why did you say a lot of them didn't?

Because a lot didn't

 

[fukmylyf]

legit thread, squidbro

 

[Roping Subhuman]

Because a lot didn't

But they did? some 13.6 million German soldiers fought in WW2 and that's out of 70 Million population of Germany at the time.

Pretty much all the Men that could actually fought in the war.

 

[Deleted member 656]

But they did? some 13.6 million German soldiers fought in WW2 and that's out of 70 Million population of Germany at the time.

Pretty much all the Men that could actually fought in the war.

I don't deny that. I was saying a lot surrendered.

 

[Roping Subhuman]

I don't deny that. I was saying a lot surrendered.

But statistically how many actually surrendered?

 

[Deleted member 656]

But statistically how many actually surrendered?

3 million on the Western front. Eastern front numbers are more debatable. 90 thousand at Stalingrad alone.

 

[GenericChad1444]

Individualism is a failed ideology. Society can't function with a religion.

copers don't want a sense of morality and self respect cos all they wanna do is get their dicks wet and live a life of luxury

 

[AspiringChad]

Nothing unites the people of NA really

 

[Roping Subhuman]

3 million on the Western front. Eastern front numbers are more debatable. 90 thousand at Stalingrad alone.

I wonder if that 3 million number includes Soldiers who surrendered without firing a shot.

 

[Deleted member 656]

I wonder if that 3 million number includes Soldiers who surrendered without firing a shot.

I doubt 3 million ever actually fired a shot across the whole war.

 

[Roping Subhuman]

I doubt 3 million ever actually fired a shot across the whole war.

What do you mean?

 

[Deleted member 656]

What do you mean?

Across the whole of WW2 I doubt 3 million German soldiers ever actually meaningfully shot in the direction of the enemy.

 

[Deleted member 2426]

if you agnostic = you normal + iq

religious = low iq

 

[KrissKross]

Islam will conquer Europe not by bullets and blades, but by the womb.













Aint that right @Adolf Fitler

 

[Roping Subhuman]

Across the whole of WW2 I doubt 3 million German soldiers ever actually meaningfully shot in the direction of the enemy.

You mean 3 million in specific front/battles. or 3 Million out of 13.6 Million German soldiers in general.

 

[Deleted member 656]

You mean 3 million in specific front/battles. or 3 Million out of 13.6 Million German soldiers in general.

3 million in general.

 

[Tony]

squidbro

 

[Salludon]

High iq op

 

[disillusioned]

Moral statements are neither analytic nor empirically verifiable therefore they are meaningless.

Low IQ. There is actually plenty of logic in religion. There is a reason for why almost every religion ever prohibits sexual decadence for example, it's because they know that stable families are required for society to function properly which isn't possible if everybody is just whoring around. The liberal narrative of religion just being a set of arbitrary rules that exist for no reason is a myth and a cope.

 

[Krezo]

Low IQ. There is actually plenty of logic in religion. There is a reason for why almost every religion ever prohibits sexual decadence for example, it's because they know that stable families are required for society to function properly which isn't possible if everybody is just whoring around. The liberal narrative of religion just being a set of arbitrary rules that exist for no reason is a myth and a cope.

You have completely misunderstood what I mean. And you're the one calling me low IQ.

Moral statements are not analytic truths (e.g tautologies) as analytic statements are always correct and can never be disputed (an example of an analytic statement would be "all bachelors are unmarried" - this cannot be disputed as it is a tautology - true by it's very definition and it would be contradictory to deny it) Moral statements are not analytic statements are they can be disputed without contradiction. There is nothing contradictory about saying "murder is wrong" for it is not a tautology.

Moral statements are neither empirically verifiable either. You can't see the 'wrongness' in murder. There is nothing objective in murder that makes it wrong. When someone says "Murder is wrong" they are merely expressing their disapproval. It is emotional. 'Wrongness' is not an objective property of murder.

Any statements which do not come under analytic truths or are empirically verifiable are meaningless and tell you nothing about the world. Moral statements come under neither of these therefore they are meaningless.