Observing effects dosent mean they had to have happened, All the anthropic principle proves is that if there were multiple possible universes, life could only observe itself in one where it exists, it dosent explain HOW there could me multiple universes or why life exists‘we’d be dead if we were 0.01% closer to the sun!!!!’
don’t they realise that the whole point we exist is because these variables are correct? if the variables were off then we wouldn’t exist to observe it
No major theists use this form of design argument nowadays, These ones existed before humans knew about evolution
probably not real theists but ive had a lot of people use that argument against me when they try to convince me of the fact that religion is real
The main design argument which ppl still use nowadays is the fact that theres no reason why the laws of the universe should remain constant as time passes, Meaning you could infer a designer.
Iqcels then ig
if you wanna see better arguments for a God try looking at the cosmological ones
it always fries me when they try to compare lightening to blood vessels in the lungs or some bs like that
why? it’s interesting to debate
sign of low iqit always fries me when they try to compare lightening to blood vessels in the lungs or some bs like that
Really illogical universe if God isnt real‘we’d be dead if we were 0.01% closer to the sun!!!!’
don’t they realise that the whole point we exist is because these variables are correct? if the variables were off then we wouldn’t exist to observe it
because there could be multiple universes with different set constants and this universe could be one where the constants are in such a way that life can thrive?
If you can avoid getting pressed asf then go for it but I cannot jfl
the people on these type of religious posts tend be far more intelligent than random tiktok users who will spew absolute nonsense
Thats less likely than a creator imo, a random universe machine or whatever you think causes them just seems silly
