The “Ideal Face” Does Exist

[thecel]

The left side is a composite of the attractive faces in a sample of men’s faces, and the right side is a composite of the unattractive faces in the sample.

As you can see, the “Chad” composite is clear and defined, while the “ugly” composite is blurry.

This shows that there is such a thing as an ideal face. The more a person deviates from this ideal beauty standard, the less attractive they are.

 

[Deleted member 6873]

And that one ideal chad is @Papabakvet

 

[Lev Peshkov]

And that one ideal chad is @Papabakvet

Obviously bro, I was just commenting 'it's Papabakvet!' as ur message appeared

 

[Lev Peshkov]

Cope, less blurry as less people jfl

But I see what you mean

 

[Deleted member 6873]

Obviously bro, I was just commenting 'it's Papabakvet!' as ur message appeared

love you too habibi

 

[Lev Peshkov]

love you too habibi

Knajjd rn:

 

[maxlooks]

View attachment 552933

The left side is a composite of the attractive faces in a sample of men’s faces, and the right side is a composite of the unattractive faces in the sample.

As you can see, the “Chad” composite is clear and defined, while the “ugly” composite is blurry.

This shows that there is such a thing as an ideal face. The more a person deviates from this ideal beauty standard, the less attractive they are.

non ideal has long philtrum jfl it's over for philtrumcel

 

[Dylan2]

No Cap Barrett more closely resembles the 2nd

 

[RealSurgerymax]

Did you create these edits?

 

[thecel]

Did you create these edits?

No. The edits are from:

What Averaged Face Photographs Reveal About Human Beauty

A while back, PetaPixel posted some features about image averaging and faces. Richard Prince created a composite portrait of the 57 faces of girlfriends

petapixel.com

They made the composites for women as well

 

[RODEBLUR]

View attachment 552933

The left side is a composite of the attractive faces in a sample of men’s faces, and the right side is a composite of the unattractive faces in the sample.

As you can see, the “Chad” composite is clear and defined, while the “ugly” composite is blurry.

This shows that there is such a thing as an ideal face. The more a person deviates from this ideal beauty standard, the less attractive they are.

Right side kind of looks like dutch celebrity Johan Derksen

 

[AutisticBeaner]

so you seriously think that there is no man more attractive than this guy?

 

[thecel]

so you seriously think that there is no man more attractive than this guy?
View attachment 553109

No, I’m not saying that particular face is the ideal, I’m saying an ideal face exists. If the composite of unattractive faces is blurry and the composite of attractive faces is clear and defined, then there must be an ideal.

 

[Deleted member 534]

yes bro

 

[gotoa10humanbeing]

blackpill woke

 

[CommanderCope]

so you seriously think that there is no man more attractive than this guy?
View attachment 553109

I think the point here is that this dude has no real flaws.

 

[Deleted member 8028]

i kinda look like the unattractive composite jfl its over

 

[Ocelot]

And why exactly does a composite represent the ideal?

All this shows is that attractive people look similar (basic blackpill that some traits are preferred over others). Unattractive people look very different as different features make each of them ugly.

 

[Deleted member 8699]

View attachment 552933

The left side is a composite of the attractive faces in a sample of men’s faces, and the right side is a composite of the unattractive faces in the sample.

As you can see, the “Chad” composite is clear and defined, while the “ugly” composite is blurry.

This shows that there is such a thing as an ideal face. The more a person deviates from this ideal beauty standard, the less attractive they are.

jfl the ugly one looks like its norwooding the hairline is more receded than in the left one

jfl it's over for baldcels it truly is

 

[SadnessWYJ]

The ideal face

 

[AutisticBeaner]

I think the point here is that this dude has no real flaws.

he has tons of flaws

 

[CommanderCope]

he has tons of flaws

like?

 

[zeroshame]

View attachment 552933

The left side is a composite of the attractive faces in a sample of men’s faces, and the right side is a composite of the unattractive faces in the sample.

As you can see, the “Chad” composite is clear and defined, while the “ugly” composite is blurry.

This shows that there is such a thing as an ideal face. The more a person deviates from this ideal beauty standard, the less attractive they are.

I've always said that good looking people are a race of their own.
This study would support my theory since the composite of attractive men shows less differences among the faces, while the composite of unattractive men shows a LOT of blurriness coming from the facial differences of the unattractive men sample.

 

[AutisticBeaner]

like?

undefined, narrow jaw, long midface, undefined nose, round hairline, sparse eyebrows (as in not dense), weak browridge. i guess here you could start the argument about what you would consider a flaw and what's simply "not ideal" instead.

 

[CommanderCope]

undefined, narrow jaw, long midface, undefined nose, round hairline, sparse eyebrows (as in not dense), weak browridge. i guess here you could start the argument about what you would consider a flaw and what's simply "not ideal" instead.

Well most of the 'undefined' narrow and weak aspects you mention are just a result of the fuzziness of the image. Also his midface ratio is exactly 1.0 so I don't know how you can call that long. His fwhr is 2.0 as well.

Sure there are men who are more attractive than him but the composite image shows a man who would most likely be universally considered attractive.

 

[Deleted member 6892]

When the attractife faces get mixed the result is mediocrity

the face is attractive because it’s striking and unique

when good and bad features of an attractive face get mixed the results isn’t really that good

 

[AutisticBeaner]

Well most of the 'undefined' narrow and weak aspects you mention are just a result of the fuzziness of the image. Also his midface ratio is exactly 1.0 so I don't know how you can call that long. His fwhr is 2.0 as well.

Sure there are men who are more attractive than him but the composite image shows a man who would most likely be universally considered attractive.

yea i was getting a bit confused about what to consider a flaw and what simply "could be better". his midface ratio and his fwhr both could definitely be better but if you consider that a flaw is up to you.

 

[hairyballscel]

Call me bluepilled or whatever but beauty is subjective to an extent, there are tribes in West Africa that consider hooked noses to be ideal/attractive, South East Asians find milk white skin to be ideal whilst other places celebrate the tanned look

Those are just 2 examples out of thousands, proving that the ideal face doesn't exist...

 

[reptiles]

The ideal face

Bogs me

 

[eduardkoopman]

View attachment 552933

The left side is a composite of the attractive faces in a sample of men’s faces, and the right side is a composite of the unattractive faces in the sample.

As you can see, the “Chad” composite is clear and defined, while the “ugly” composite is blurry.

This shows that there is such a thing as an ideal face. The more a person deviates from this ideal beauty standard, the less attractive they are.

this is the face that scrores highest on the actor: averageness.

BUT. the most attractive face possible. Scores high in averageness, BUT also deviates from it in the possitive upside. Aka: a little bit more/better dhymorphism than the averageness. thus for example; A SLIGHTLY stroger jawline, slightly higher set cheeckbone, slighlty etc..

Basically, an slightly mm improved versone of the averageness male face.
that is the ultimate TeraChad face

But the averageness face, is a great starting point. BUT it's not the ideal SMV face