Tyrant
NIGHTMARE NIGHTMARE NIGHTMARE
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2022
- Posts
- 317
- Reputation
- 229
TLDR at the bottom of the page
This theory focuses significantly on the interaction between lacrimals and nose projection. Specifically the medial canthus tendons, which attach to the frontal process of the maxilla, the groove of the lacrimal bone, and the tarsus of the eyelids. The ones we're really interested in are the frontal process and the lacrimals.
The Case Of Henry Cavill
With more nasal projection you might expect the medial canthus to elongate due to the positioning of the lacrimals. However chads like Henry Cavill do not have a elongated downturned medial canthus despite having mogger forward growth. This led me to look at the lacrimal area. In Cavill's case, his lacrimals look somewhat recessed( that's the term I'm going to use here ). By recessed I mean it looks like the lacrimal area essentially "caves inwards", creating a hollow look there messing with the contours( look at the picture labelled 1). Also this isn't even an under eyes problem his under eyes are fine.
This is not a isolated case; other images support the appearance of "recession" in this area (Picture 2). Look how in the area where the lacrimals would be, it sorta "dips" in. Given his nasal projection and forward growth you would think he'd have a downturned medial canthus, yet this is not the case. And even in the side profile picture, although different lighting to hide flaws, you can still see the slight cave. Also you can search for many pictures, the dip is there every single time.
But when we look at moggers with pronounced elongated medial canthus, such as Andreas Eriksen, there's no recession in the lacrimal area as observed with Cavill. The contour lines around his lacrimal area are smooth, as shown in Picture 3, with no visible dip. It's also worth noting that Eriksen's nasal projection and forward growth is not as good as Cavill's, which further emphasizes the discrepancy.
This pattern is not even exclusive to Eriksen. Other medial canthus moggers like David Gandy, Atesh Salih and De Poot do not show this recessive characteristic in their lacrimal areas.
They all have good nasal projection too. And unlike Cavill, you dont see that dip from the side in the lacrimal area.
This observation suggests that the relationship between lacrimal structure and nasal projection, and their impact on the medial canthus, may not be as straightforward as previously thought. What I'm getting at is even if you get/have forward growth and or nasal projection it does not guarantee a down turned elongated medial canthus. People who already have the base for it would benefit the most from forward growth of the maxilla because as we all know that more upper maxilla = more nose projection.
How do we fix this? I don't know but I know it has to do with manipulation of the lacrimals. This theory also pairs well with @mvp2v1 's theory on the orbitals, you should go read it tbh.
Also inb4 "muuhhhh muuuhhh lighting muuh!111!!11
" shut the fuck up, you can search up multiple of these people and you'd see they don't exhibit that dip in all lightings, whereas Cavill pretty much has it 24/7.
Remember this is just a theory I'm not a surgeon or whatever its just what I've observed and I could be completely wrong tbh.
TLDR?:
There is no TLDR its either you read or GTFO
This theory focuses significantly on the interaction between lacrimals and nose projection. Specifically the medial canthus tendons, which attach to the frontal process of the maxilla, the groove of the lacrimal bone, and the tarsus of the eyelids. The ones we're really interested in are the frontal process and the lacrimals.
The Case Of Henry Cavill
With more nasal projection you might expect the medial canthus to elongate due to the positioning of the lacrimals. However chads like Henry Cavill do not have a elongated downturned medial canthus despite having mogger forward growth. This led me to look at the lacrimal area. In Cavill's case, his lacrimals look somewhat recessed( that's the term I'm going to use here ). By recessed I mean it looks like the lacrimal area essentially "caves inwards", creating a hollow look there messing with the contours( look at the picture labelled 1). Also this isn't even an under eyes problem his under eyes are fine.
This is not a isolated case; other images support the appearance of "recession" in this area (Picture 2). Look how in the area where the lacrimals would be, it sorta "dips" in. Given his nasal projection and forward growth you would think he'd have a downturned medial canthus, yet this is not the case. And even in the side profile picture, although different lighting to hide flaws, you can still see the slight cave. Also you can search for many pictures, the dip is there every single time.
But when we look at moggers with pronounced elongated medial canthus, such as Andreas Eriksen, there's no recession in the lacrimal area as observed with Cavill. The contour lines around his lacrimal area are smooth, as shown in Picture 3, with no visible dip. It's also worth noting that Eriksen's nasal projection and forward growth is not as good as Cavill's, which further emphasizes the discrepancy.
This pattern is not even exclusive to Eriksen. Other medial canthus moggers like David Gandy, Atesh Salih and De Poot do not show this recessive characteristic in their lacrimal areas.
They all have good nasal projection too. And unlike Cavill, you dont see that dip from the side in the lacrimal area.
This observation suggests that the relationship between lacrimal structure and nasal projection, and their impact on the medial canthus, may not be as straightforward as previously thought. What I'm getting at is even if you get/have forward growth and or nasal projection it does not guarantee a down turned elongated medial canthus. People who already have the base for it would benefit the most from forward growth of the maxilla because as we all know that more upper maxilla = more nose projection.
How do we fix this? I don't know but I know it has to do with manipulation of the lacrimals. This theory also pairs well with @mvp2v1 's theory on the orbitals, you should go read it tbh.
Also inb4 "muuhhhh muuuhhh lighting muuh!111!!11
" shut the fuck up, you can search up multiple of these people and you'd see they don't exhibit that dip in all lightings, whereas Cavill pretty much has it 24/7.Remember this is just a theory I'm not a surgeon or whatever its just what I've observed and I could be completely wrong tbh.
TLDR?:
There is no TLDR its either you read or GTFO
