Xangsane
^ This is a looksmatched couple
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2021
- Posts
- 150,048
- Reputation
- 127,037
@OldRooster @Pretty
Do you know exactly why this stool transplant company (Human Microbes) that pays you $180,000 a year to become a stool donor, has strict requirements?
Excerpt from their site:
In order to become a stool donor for this company, you need to be a top athlete, a natty body, with a type 3 Bristol Stool with no health complications. Even being an average Chadlite or Chad doesn't cut it. You have to be EXCEPTIONAL in EVERYTHING.
I had a look at the company's website (which honestly seems like a scam) and the founder writes a heap of blackpilling stuff.
The reason why this stool donor company pays so handsomely ($180,000 a year) compared to other companies that pay you far less for being a donor, is because they are looking for the top 0.1% of people: young, fit chad and stacy athletes.
I sent out an application to the company, but I'm very sure I will be rejected as I'm an average, autistic guy with 16% body fat with some bad bacteria in my gut which I'm trying to sort out with probiotics. Even though I eat a balanced, fibre-rich diet, I fart a lot and sometimes get gas pains. In fact, I have gas pains in my stomach right now. My stools are mostly Type 3-4, and occasionally I might get a Type 5 stool if my stomach is grumbling. My Chadlite face doesn't matter. I won't get in, and I don't have the best genetics.
Now here are some ultra blackpilling articles the company and website owner has written, and I will quote some areas of interest. He frequently spams the word "athletes":
Attractiveness, facial features, health & development, and FMT donor selection: January 2022
Attractiveness, facial features, health & development: January 2022
Do you know exactly why this stool transplant company (Human Microbes) that pays you $180,000 a year to become a stool donor, has strict requirements?
Let's see if any of us qualifies to be a turd donor. [THEY WANT ELITE GENETICS TOO]
Original thread by @OldRooster https://looksmax.org/threads/human-microbes-paying-500-for-young-gymcel-poop.644335/ The website: https://www.humanmicrobes.org/donors Requirements: Scroll down until you see this, and take the questionnaire: Once you get the results, vote in the poll if you...
looksmax.org
Donors - Become a stool donor for FMT (Fecal Microbiota Transplants) or research — Human Microbes
Make Money, Save Lives. Become a stool donor for FMT (Fecal Microbiota Transplants) or research
www.humanmicrobes.org
Excerpt from their site:
In order to become a stool donor for this company, you need to be a top athlete, a natty body, with a type 3 Bristol Stool with no health complications. Even being an average Chadlite or Chad doesn't cut it. You have to be EXCEPTIONAL in EVERYTHING.
I had a look at the company's website (which honestly seems like a scam) and the founder writes a heap of blackpilling stuff.
The reason why this stool donor company pays so handsomely ($180,000 a year) compared to other companies that pay you far less for being a donor, is because they are looking for the top 0.1% of people: young, fit chad and stacy athletes.
After the first wave of ~6,000 applicants, we had no one promising. I was advised to increase prices in order to attract higher quality donors, so we doubled the prices from a minimum of $80 per stool to $150 per stool, and that increased donor payouts from around $2,000/mo to $4,000+.
I sent out an application to the company, but I'm very sure I will be rejected as I'm an average, autistic guy with 16% body fat with some bad bacteria in my gut which I'm trying to sort out with probiotics. Even though I eat a balanced, fibre-rich diet, I fart a lot and sometimes get gas pains. In fact, I have gas pains in my stomach right now. My stools are mostly Type 3-4, and occasionally I might get a Type 5 stool if my stomach is grumbling. My Chadlite face doesn't matter. I won't get in, and I don't have the best genetics.
Now here are some ultra blackpilling articles the company and website owner has written, and I will quote some areas of interest. He frequently spams the word "athletes":
Index
On this blog: 2023, Jun 15. Reddit is dangerous. The admins are out of control. Humanity needs a viable alternative. 2021, Jun 21. Idiocr...
maximiliankohler.blogspot.com
The evidence and rationale supporting our donor criteria: January 2023
The evidence and rationale supporting our stool donor criteria — Human Microbes
Addressing common questions about our donor criteria. Namely, why we focus so much on top young athletes.
www.humanmicrobes.org
Since the gut microbiome has been shown to impact and regulate virtually every aspect of human health and development, you want the most well-developed, high-functioning people – typically, top athletes. The quality of a person's gut microbiome would reflect in their physical abilities and attributes. So someone with an eubiotic/ideal gut microbiome should be very high performing, well-developed, competent, intelligent, happy, etc.. And due to the gut microbiome's role in the diseases of old age, including aging itself, donors should also be young. In contrast, a dysbiotic gut microbiome would limit/degrade a person's capabilities and physical attributes. We need top young athletes in their prime.
HumanMicrobes.org has now screened dozens of college and professional athletes. But none have met our ideal criteria, and only a small percentage are people I'd pick out of a line up to be likely to qualify. There are a dozen or so who are very healthy & fit young athletes with bad stool types, and this type of applicant makes me feel like giving up.
After trying 7 or so different donors, the two highest quality/most effective ones had identical stool types, as well as nearly identical questionnaires, and very similar physical traits.
After seeing hundreds of applicant's stools & physiques, I don't even feel a strong need to test my stool type hypothesis anymore, since the correlation of stool type with physique is quite clear and consistent.
Yes, we're looking for top young athletes. But a top young athlete with a bad stool type won't qualify.
Health, and thus gut microbiome status, reflect in our appearance. Yet another self-evident/common sense, intuitive conclusion I made from the start, which turned out to be surprisingly controversial [1].
After screening 23,000+ donor applicants, my intuition seems to have been correct. You can absolutely match physical traits with stool type. For the vast majority of people, I can simply look at them and tell they have a bad stool type and won't qualify; or I can look at their stool and know they have poor physical traits. Features such as adiposity, complexion, musculature, bone structure, symmetry, etc.. There are a small percentage of people who have seemingly great physical traits but a bad/non ideal stool type. And those are very frustrating to review.
First results from our 1 in 23,000 donor: January 2023
First results from our 1 in 23,000 stool donor. — Human Microbes
Sitting on a possible panacea and working hard to get the tiny percent who qualify to stop flushing lifesaving medicine down the toilet.
www.humanmicrobes.org
Luckily, our project was organically mentioned on social media and that resulted in over a million views and 23,000+ donor applicants. Unfortunately, the vast majority of applicants were extremely unhealthy, despite our website clearly saying "looking for the top 0.1% healthiest people", and showing multiple examples of healthy people.
High body fat seemed to correlate with liquid/very soft stool. I found this surprising since I wonder how they're able to absorb enough calories. Possibly the lack of solid stool results in lack of satiation.
When I contact people directly who seem more likely to qualify, they usually don't respond. When we do general outreach via ads, social media, etc. we mostly get extremely unhealthy people, along with about 1% who are generally healthy but probably wouldn't be a highly effective stool donor.
We need people like Giannis Antetokounmpo, Russell Westbrook, Stephen Curry, Virgil Van Dijk, Mohamed Salah, Kylian Mbappé, Cristiano Ronaldo, and Erling Haaland. But if we can't even get an athlete with a public health degree to sign up to be a stool donor, what hope is there?
Most of these top young athletes should probably be making more money from their stool than any of their other activities. Just look at the massive crowds of extremely unhealthy people watching them play. Then compare that to the costs of healthcare.
There should be massive pressure, from the 99.9% of the population who is unhealthy, put on the fewer than 0.1% people who qualify to be high quality stool donors, to donate their stool. Yet there is next to none. That they are flushing lifesaving medicine down the toilet each day should be looked upon with horror by society. But that doesn’t happen due to the ignorance, apathy, and worse, of the 99.9%.
Attractiveness, facial features, health & development, and FMT donor selection: January 2022
This is what a healthy human looks like:
- https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-q9TXnZ8rsLA/WnCTx2UlHBI/AAAAAAAAKYI/EVezW1GhojkYMpggvxsvYLCt0V8V5fRawCLcBGAs/s1600/Maasai-.jpg
- http://humanfoodproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/threedudes.jpg
- One on far right is healthiest IMO: https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-PSelfqKFrP4/U55e8Gwp8kI/AAAAAAAACtE/MWFqpWSSVSU/s1600/maasai_boys_in_hunting_gear.jpg
- https://i.redd.it/af7hhteogms31.png
How many people look like that in most of the world? In my locations it's been somewhere between 1%-0.1% or less. When I used to see documentaries or news coverage of developing countries there were many people who looked like that. But these days most look as unhealthy as everyone else, which is extremely alarming to me. My observations are supported by the data:
And visible health markers are only the bare minimum. You can be thin/fit/attractive and still have underlying dysbiosis and disease. Which reduces the amount of people who qualify as healthy, high functioning people with eubiotic gut microbiomes way below 0.1%.
Attractiveness, facial features, health & development: January 2022
Health absolutely reflects in the face. Does that mean every person with an attractive face is healthy? No. Does that mean we can determine someone's health only by seeing their face? No. But there definitely are facial features/cues we can use to gauge a person's health and development.
You can do a web search for "face gains" to see increased facial attractiveness is a very common phenomena in people who make improvements in physical fitness.
There is large overlap between athletes and models. Most top athletes are not unattractive.
From what I've noticed, people are generally using make up and digital filters to hide poor health.
Last edited: