THE REASON ATTRACTIVE PEOPLE OF DIFFERENT RACES ALL LOOK THE SAME

D

Deleted member 9467

kpopmaxxer
Joined
Sep 2, 2020
Posts
2,634
Reputation
4,291
Not because of eurocentric beauty standards JFL.

I believe it's cuz they're the least inbred. Meaning their ancestors were so genetically different that all the dominant alleles had a chance to squash the recessive alleles, leaving them with very common, plain traits. And these common traits correspond to normal, healthy ratios and a lack of wacky facial traits. This "averageness" indicates health and fertility.

Attractive people all look the same because they all have the same set of "normal" genes. They don't have stereotypical traits caused by inbreeding - Muslim low ipd, Jewish nose, Asian low pfl, African wide nose, curry bad skin, English shit maxilla + nw, or Nordic thin lips and lack of eyebrows
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: angelo, bugeye, Deleted member 13994 and 3 others
Ricecel cope
Stop coping pls
You mongoloid are ugly because of your death tier skull/bones/shape

Euro people just look better
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: litaz, Danish_Retard, user47283 and 10 others
shitskin cope
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard, Deleted member 4946, Jason Voorhees and 1 other person
changs look nothing like chads, chadrones, or chaddams. Tyrones are their own group as well
 
  • +1
Reactions: litaz, Danish_Retard, Lolcel and 5 others
Not because of eurocentric beauty standards JFL.

I believe it's cuz they're the least inbred. Meaning their ancestors were so genetically different that all the dominant alleles had a chance to squash the recessive alleles, leaving them with very common, plain traits. And these common traits correspond to normal, healthy ratios and a lack of wacky facial traits. This "averageness" indicates health and fertility.

Attractive people all look the same because they all have the same set of "normal" genes. They don't have stereotypical traits caused by inbreeding - Muslim low ipd, Jewish nose, Asian low pfl, African wide nose, curry bad skin, English shit maxilla + nw, or Nordic thin lips and lack of eyebrows

This is correct actually, yes. Phenotypically, it is manifested as high degree of averageness (or low fluctuating asymmetry) which signals exactly what you described.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Patient A and KraftDurchLeid
eurocentric beauty standards
this makes it seem like society decided to think of Europeans as the most beautiful but it didn't, they are just naturally the most beautiful.

It's an interesting thought though. Maybe Europeans are the best looking because also their recessive genes mostly correspond with "beauty standards"?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 13994
This is correct actually, yes. Phenotypically, it is manifested as high degree of averageness (or low fluctuating asymmetry) which signals exactly what you described.
I thought asymmetry was mostly a result of bad environment?
 
I thought asymmetry was mostly a result of bad environment?
Wrong. Fluctuating asymmetry is a direct result of developmental stability. Developmental stability is achieved by your genes interacting with the environment during critical gestational and growth periods; a gene expression program that resists stressors, the origin of which can be environmental or stochastic and internally generated.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 22126
Wrong. Fluctuating asymmetry is a direct result of developmental stability. Developmental stability is achieved by your genes interacting with the environment during critical gestational and growth periods; a gene expression program that resists stressors, the origin of which can be environmental or stochastic and internally generated.
so "bad genes" in that sense mean bigger vulnerability to bad environment? But if the child is raised inthe best possible environment, these genes won't express themselves given they don't do it stochastically?
 
so "bad genes" in that sense mean bigger vulnerability to bad environment? But if the child is raised inthe best possible environment, these genes won't express themselves given they don't do it stochastically?
Yes and no. Yes as in that poor ability to resist stressors (environmental or otherwise) during critical growth periods leads to loss of averageness and higher fluctuating asymmetry.

Think of it likes this. There is a universal tendency to DISORDER as time moves forward (this is also the 2nd law of thermodyanmics). To resist this natural tendency to disorder, it requires tremendous energy input. You need good genes to resist.
 
  • +1
Reactions: KraftDurchLeid
Normie discussion
 
  • +1
Reactions: PURE ARYAN GENETICS
Why are people so stupid here? Is there any IQ on the forum now whatsoever? It’s because its androgenic vs. estrogenic. Height, wide jaw, wide shoulders, hunter eyes, it’s all high t and what women have been wired throughout history, throughout evolution, throughout different areas to look for because those strong genes would survive. It’s not the race of the attractive person its the features of them, pheno comes second etc.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard and Deleted member 4946
Not because of eurocentric beauty standards JFL.

I believe it's cuz they're the least inbred. Meaning their ancestors were so genetically different that all the dominant alleles had a chance to squash the recessive alleles, leaving them with very common, plain traits. And these common traits correspond to normal, healthy ratios and a lack of wacky facial traits. This "averageness" indicates health and fertility.

Attractive people all look the same because they all have the same set of "normal" genes. They don't have stereotypical traits caused by inbreeding - Muslim low ipd, Jewish nose, Asian low pfl, African wide nose, curry bad skin, English shit maxilla + nw, or Nordic thin lips and lack of eyebrows
They don't though
 
Not because of eurocentric beauty standards JFL.

I believe it's cuz they're the least inbred. Meaning their ancestors were so genetically different that all the dominant alleles had a chance to squash the recessive alleles, leaving them with very common, plain traits. And these common traits correspond to normal, healthy ratios and a lack of wacky facial traits. This "averageness" indicates health and fertility.

Attractive people all look the same because they all have the same set of "normal" genes. They don't have stereotypical traits caused by inbreeding - Muslim low ipd, Jewish nose, Asian low pfl, African wide nose, curry bad skin, English shit maxilla + nw, or Nordic thin lips and lack of eyebrows
By this thread it is proven that Pakistan is supposed to be the most subhuman country ever, cause 61 percentage of their population is inbred and the rest are spineless refugees driven away from their original place
 
I made a similar thread about this
 
By this thread it is proven that Pakistan is supposed to be the most subhuman country ever, cause 61 percentage of their population is inbred and the rest are spineless refugees driven away from their original place
inbreeding isnt big deal unless generaional i think, so if its one gen of inbreeding then no problemo but there is also pollution lack of nutrition at prenetal for mom so that has effect
 

Similar threads

6ft4
Replies
64
Views
2K
|Daddy_Zygos|
|Daddy_Zygos|
Seth Walsh
Replies
19
Views
3K
LifeMaxxer01
L
Spidermanne2returns
Replies
21
Views
4K
wannabe_mogger
W

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top