disillusioned
Fuchsia
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2019
- Posts
- 11,881
- Reputation
- 35,787
It makes plenty of sense if you think about it. Consider the fact that the ugliest demographics (ethnics, Indians (not the European looking Northern ones), blacks, poorer/working-class whites, etc) always ALWAYS have lower IQ on average and more primordial facial features.
Modern PC bullshit claims Europeans only stereotyped third-world populations as looking primitive because of racism, but this is not true. Many black and brown populations have facial features that legitimately look more 'stone age' compared to the other races (large, flat noses, big lips, etc). Even amongst whites themselves, the inferior/low IQ elements (working class, poor, etc) don't seem to have the same phenotype/look as the higher IQ/richer whites do. They look cruder.
I have a theory.
I think the reason women despise bad looks is that they indicate inferior intelligence and shittier temperament (more likely to abuse/beat the woman) which women instinctively associate with lesser status and a lower likelihood of being treated well. They look at the cavemen features and think "this person is dumb af and will also probably beat me".
What women actually want, are pretty but physically fit prettyboys. Tall and physically fit males with feminine faces. Ripped but cute. They associate that with fitness but also intelligence and good temperament.
What people call 'ugly' features are actually just primordial/brutish features.
But what about Asians you ask? They don't look that great yet are higher IQ, right? 2 things:
1. It's only East-Asians (Korea/Japan) that are high IQ.
2. Southern/Pacific Asians are brown and have lower IQ.
3. East-Asian males aren't really 'ugly' so much as they just lack masculine features (height/muscle/etc).
Modern PC bullshit claims Europeans only stereotyped third-world populations as looking primitive because of racism, but this is not true. Many black and brown populations have facial features that legitimately look more 'stone age' compared to the other races (large, flat noses, big lips, etc). Even amongst whites themselves, the inferior/low IQ elements (working class, poor, etc) don't seem to have the same phenotype/look as the higher IQ/richer whites do. They look cruder.
I have a theory.
I think the reason women despise bad looks is that they indicate inferior intelligence and shittier temperament (more likely to abuse/beat the woman) which women instinctively associate with lesser status and a lower likelihood of being treated well. They look at the cavemen features and think "this person is dumb af and will also probably beat me".
What women actually want, are pretty but physically fit prettyboys. Tall and physically fit males with feminine faces. Ripped but cute. They associate that with fitness but also intelligence and good temperament.
What people call 'ugly' features are actually just primordial/brutish features.
But what about Asians you ask? They don't look that great yet are higher IQ, right? 2 things:
1. It's only East-Asians (Korea/Japan) that are high IQ.
2. Southern/Pacific Asians are brown and have lower IQ.
3. East-Asian males aren't really 'ugly' so much as they just lack masculine features (height/muscle/etc).