The reasons for Third World immigration pushing

[Reinhard_Heini]

Maybe first things first. More than a few readers have asked me the same question that I myself asked for many years (and still do to a degree): why? Why would anyone be hellbent on destroying a wonderfully advanced and stable society with Third World immigration? Well, it seems Rockefeller & co. realized a long time ago that striving towards a "one world government" is little more than sound economic principle for all mutinationals, making it possible to organize and shape them towards this common cause, in the process taking over and dominating all national governments. As for the specific reasons for immigration pushing, take your pick:

• Endless neoliberal stock market growth for the companies in question.
• Endless supplies of cheap labor from Africa, the Middle East and Latin America.
• Division and ignorance at the workplace due Third World immigration additionally helps to undermine labor unions, and in general to keep wages low and labor laws at a minimum.
• A white minority will make it many times easier to overcome opposition to expand "free trade" borders towards places as Russia, the Middle East, Africa and Latin America; i.e. expand the European Union towards Africa and the Middle East and the NAFTA towards all of the Americas (David Rockefeller himself and Dick Cheney-supported the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), which failed in 2005).
• Higher economic output (feminism) and less tax pressure on multinationals, because you don't have half the population at home (one parent) raising two to three kids, each requiring child support, with way too many kids wanting to go to college.
• Mass third world immigration - through a lack of sophistication and identity with western history - will break white culture, including its increasing penchant to ask questions about past conspiries and who is ruling them from behind the scenes. Controlling the conspiracy narrative in the age of the internet seems to be costing governments and corporations billions a year.
• Heavy increases in crime due to Third World immigration can be used to create police states - in a very surreptitious way - that not only have economic benefits, but also allows for a much easier clampdown on "conspiracy talk".
• The less democracy, the more it will allow elites to propagandize interracial marriages to combat "racism", and even force them by law to quickly reshape whole continents with a more homogeneous race and a nice balance of low and high IQ.

Granted, all of these theories came about as a process of simply taking some time to answer the question, "What would be my motivation for pushing Third World immigration if I was heading a large multinational?" It actually had to be done this way, because I have never seen the above theories discussed, apart from the most obvious: "cheap labor". We could do the same theorizing with other areas of globalist propaganda of past and present:

• Contraception funding and promotion since at least the 1970s, combined with HIV alarmism until the present day, may have been a good development for the most part - but it also very effectively decreased white birth rates.
• LGBTQ: the more gays, bisexuals and transsexuels around, the lower the birth rate and the more "activists" can be generated to create artificial strife with.
• Feminism: The more women in the workplace, the higher the economic output of the country and the less time they have to make and raise babies; and the more irrational and vicious the war for "equality" and against men, the less men will be able to be "men" (at work and at home), the more they withdraw from political debates, and the less they will band together to try to overthrow the system - which they have done throughout history.

As for the disadvantages of this globalist agenda:

• Such an agenda requires endless brainwashing, propaganda and manipulation to keep the masses ignorant of the real agenda.
• Without hardly any kids and both parents forced to work full time to survive, it destroys the traditional family structure (in this regard, it is fascinating how Black Lives Matter, in its official website writings, wants to "disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure...", an early disastrous policy of Bolshevism).
• There's a constant need to destroy highly stable, evolved and intellectual 1st world societies by ramming much more criminal, ignorant "refugees"/workers from 3rd world societies into them.

Let's face it, none of these "negatives" have ever been an obstacle for the powers that be. Forcing Third World immigration is little more than reversed and toned-down slavery. White people were too expensive in the 1600s and 1700s; and they still are too expensive today. Corporations simply operate according to their nature: survival of the fittest. It is up to the massess to become aware, rise up, and force the media and their pliable little politicians to work for them as well; not just a giant network of conspiring corporations. It's the only way. Continuing to vote "liberal CIA" or conservative CIA " is not going to save your country, your continent, or your race.

This theory actually also explains why multinationals, many of which survive to this day and are part of the globalist movement, poured enormous amounts of funds into an emerging Nazi Germany. Or why the globalist group has been so unbelievably lax towards China for decades on end, allowing the CCP to build the country up into an enormously threatening superpower.

Money has a tendency to explain the world. Money, power - and sex. There could be more to it, but the reasons for immigration pushing listed here are a pretty sound basis.

 

[Reinhard_Heini]

Fucking sad, anyways it’s seen

 

[StillGrowingTaller]

Fucking sad, anyways it’s seen

nowadays website is all redditards that don’t give a shit and wanna dye their hair and vote woke to bring in millions of raping Muslims and Africans to their once beautiful and safe western societies