The scope of racial disparities in test scores in the United States

Link me to when it was “refuted multiple times” then. Also yes it absolutely does invalidate something, chatgpt tells you want to hear JFL, you can write any narrative you want using chatgpt

The guy didn't reply to a single thing we said
Crazy way to evade arguments, don't waste your energy on him anymore :DankPepe:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Reinhard_Heini and Former Shortcel
Seems like we both are in the middle of race war and both our comments got dnrd @Mess
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Former Shortcel and Mess
What do you think of Richard Lynn's Cold Winter Theory?
It heavily Depends on the Individuum, there are situations where the result is exactly what nobody would exempt it’s also a pure speculation, it cannot be proven at all , only theoretically it’s possible or impossible
 
  • +1
Reactions: MediterraneanMoid and Mess
  • +1
Reactions: CloudyCuck, Reinhard_Heini and Jason Voorhees
I don’t believe In it, i have some theoretical argument for this as seen, it’s not just my delusion which says that, it’s a logical argumentum.
People that are black tends to be better in sport, it’s seen by the average I don’t deny that, but it also depends on the sport by this one, cause in the water whites are overall better than blacks.
What i mean is the fact whites are better in a Spectrum of logic/tactics, so it’s seen.
I disagree, but fair enough
 
  • +1
Reactions: Reinhard_Heini
Never get between Muhammed and his keyboard warrioring. :fuk:
Both baited each other and @CloudyCuck gave it a religious angle and there was no saving this thread
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Former Shortcel, MediterraneanMoid and Mess
This nigga just said a whole bunch of nothing and he didn't even checked the fucking source we gave him, he didn't even refuted them
Nigga you look like a fucking ape right now tbh
if you have some dignity leave the convo already jeez :ROFLMAO:
And again you quote some ideological source that is clearly biased, use your brain son...

Stop chimping out and get lost already :pepePoint:
Saar you said nothing saar u no refute saar
Link me to when it was “refuted multiple times” then. Also yes it absolutely does invalidate something, chatgpt tells you want to hear JFL, you can write any narrative you want using chatgpt
Are you fucking retarded? You said i use chatgpt sources (i don't) and i said it doesn't invalidate them??????

Stupid cracker can't read the replies, read the whole argument next time, cumskin

Post in thread '@Ahmed88 | Intellectually Disabled or Trolling?'
https://looksmax.org/threads/ahmed88-intellectually-disabled-or-trolling.1889868/post-26434832

Post in thread '@Ahmed88 | Intellectually Disabled or Trolling?'
https://looksmax.org/threads/ahmed88-intellectually-disabled-or-trolling.1889868/post-26425029
 
  • +1
Reactions: AgentAngularity
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Reinhard_Heini, Jason Voorhees and Former Shortcel
Saar you said nothing saar u no refute saar

Are you fucking retarded? You said i use chatgpt sources (i don't) and i said it doesn't invalidate them??????

Stupid cracker can't read the replies, read the whole argument next time, cumskin

Post in thread '@Ahmed88 | Intellectually Disabled or Trolling?'
https://looksmax.org/threads/ahmed88-intellectually-disabled-or-trolling.1889868/post-26434832

Post in thread '@Ahmed88 | Intellectually Disabled or Trolling?'
https://looksmax.org/threads/ahmed88-intellectually-disabled-or-trolling.1889868/post-26425029
the refuting of using chatgpt in question:
IMG 9243

A picture showing 0% GPT, yet you didnt include the texts you wrote in the screenshot JFL. I wonder why?

Also how come when you quoted my original reply, you left out the part where I said “You can tell when he goes from sounding like an angry chimp to suddenly talking like some scientist. Guarantee he hasnt read a single source he sends”?

Is it because you know thats the truth? Just because you mix in your angry chimp talk into your gpt paragraphs doesnt make it any less noticeable jfl.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Reinhard_Heini and CloudyCuck
Are you fucking retarded? You said i use chatgpt sources (i don't) and i said it doesn't invalidate them??????

Stupid cracker can't read the replies, read the whole argument next time, cumskinhttps://looksmax.org/threads/ahmed88-intellectually-disabled-or-trolling.1889868/post-26434832
Um, no? I said that you use chatgpt sources (you do) and it DOES invalidate them.

Maybe learn how to read a reply first instead of impulsively replying calling me a “stupid cracker”.
 
the refuting of using chatgpt in question:
IMG 9243

A picture showing 0% GPT, yet you didnt include the texts you wrote in the screenshot JFL. I wonder why?
Are you retarded?
You know my fucking thread is public and anyone can do it right?
Um, no? I said that you use chatgpt sources (you do) and it DOES invalidate them.
Chatgpt sources??? What??? You mean sources given to me or chatgpt as a sourve, get your wording straight, cumskin


Using research sourced from chagpt isn't wrong

Using chatgpt as a source is


Faggot
 
Are you retarded?
You know my fucking thread is public and anyone can do it right?

Chatgpt sources??? What??? You mean sources given to me or chatgpt as a sourve, get your wording straight, cumskin


Using research sourced from chagpt isn't wrong

Using chatgpt as a source is


Faggot
Yeah just more unnecessary chimping out. Classic from a camel jockey. My work here is done
 
Yeah just more unnecessary chimping out. Classic from a camel jockey. My work here is done
Saar chimp out saar

Run run run away, run in fear and hide cumskin

Run from the hands of the mujahideen, nothing will save you, when the time comes and the great caliphate prevails, you won't be able to run or hide, it will be a slaughterground for you the white genocide is near, none of your insults hurt me, they strenghten me, soon we will impregnate your whore women and create soldiers for the caliphate
 
  • +1
Reactions: chadzay
Saar chimp out saar

Run run run away, run in fear and hide cumskin

Run from the hands of the mujahideen, nothing will save you, when the time comes and the great caliphate prevails, you won't be able to run or hide, it will be a slaughterground for you the white genocide is near, none of your insults hurt me, they strenghten me, soon we will impregnate your whore women and create soldiers for the caliphate
Yeah just more unnecessary chimping out. Classic from a camel jockey. My work here is done
 
Yeah just more unnecessary chimping out. Classic from a camel jockey. My work here is done
Run run run away, run in fear and hide cumskin

Run from the hands of the mujahideen, nothing will save you, when the time comes and the great caliphate prevails, you won't be able to run or hide, it will be a slaughterground for you the white genocide is near, none of your insults hurt me, they strenghten me, soon we will impregnate your whore women and create soldiers for the caliphate
 
Yeah just more unnecessary chimping out. Classic from a camel jockey. My work here is done
he is right , chatgpt provide the sources and when you and ur bwc friend are debating w me they also send IA source from google research without any source , dont act like he isnt right pls
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ahmed88
he is right , chatgpt provide the sources and when you and ur bwc friend are debating w me they also send IA source from google research without any source , dont act like he isnt right pls
Keep seething for me my pet. Cant take you seriously after you confirmed your “friend” is infact YOU after sending me your eye area in pms
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Anakin_10k
Keep seething for me my pet. Cant take you seriously after you confirmed your “friend” is infact YOU after sending me your eye area in pms
Did prove nothing lol , I debunked u , ur js asking for more and more pic while I alr debunked I sended the eye area and it isnt the same bro ,
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ahmed88
Did prove nothing lol , I debunked u , ur js asking for more and more pic while I alr debunked I sended the eye area and it isnt the same bro ,
It is, if youre so confident that its “not your eye area” then you will let me send it on this thread right now.

Also JFL reacting my post doesnt hide what i said got to you
 
It is, if youre so confident that its “not your eye area” then you will let me send it on this thread right now.

Also JFL reacting my post doesnt hide what i said got to you
Ill do it myself lol ,
Screenshot 20260502 202430 Chrome
Screenshot 20260501 203032 Gallery
not the as him at all
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Former Shortcel
  • +1
Reactions: Wuzzdio and pfl
@pfl @joao23 @Wuzzdio “not my eye area bro”.

Also why did you cover the rest of your face? Is it because your other features will give confirmation that its you?

Also why didnt u send the other picture you sent me which literally confirms its you?
No its because i dont want to show my real face here lol:forcedsmile:i didnt send the other cuz as u said u wanted a undistorted pic and the first I sent was a selfie braaaahh
 
No its because i dont want to show my real face here lol:forcedsmile:i didnt send the other cuz as u said u wanted a undistorted pic and the first I sent was a selfie braaaahh
Major cope, youve already sent your face on here multiple times. Peep this 👇
IMG 9246
 
  • +1
Reactions: Reinhard_Heini
Studies from 2001, 2015, 2010.
Over 10y years are Outdated asf, shits gone with the wind
 
i literally copy pasted his thread where he himself thought it was me , also the mog battle specify that its my friend bro
Again major cope.

You self admitted to this being you both in that thread by associating your face via tagging your name, and also in this post 👇
IMG 9192


Bro just admit youve slipped up and that its not “your friend” :forcedsmile:
 
Again major cope.

You self admitted to this being you both in that thread by associating your face via tagging your name, and also in this post 👇
View attachment 4997762

Bro just admit youve slipped up and that its not “your friend” :forcedsmile:
I clearly said it was my friend , and the " why 13yrs old me look better " was an obv joke and bait , same as the " 10 dimo " joke , i said that it was my friend almost all the time , i proved it w the eye area ,
Screenshot 20260502 202430 Chrome
like isnt it clear that we arent the same person , and dont told me to remove the draw cuz I dont want the situation to happens again ( ppl arguing abt my face ) or simply for obv privacy reason
 
I clearly said it was my friend
“My friend” yet youve made 10+ threads asking the same question if “your friend” looks good or not JFL. Not even including the fact of how much you say “your friend” supposedly mogs
, and the " why 13yrs old me look better " was an obv joke and bait , same as the " 10 dimo " joke
Schrodinger’s Idiot: Someone who says really stupid things, then decides whether or not he was joking based upon the reaction of people around him.
, i said that it was my friend almost all the time , i proved it w the eye area , View attachment 4997779
Very clearly is you. Same as how the other picture you pmed me is literally identical to “your friend”
like isnt it clear that we arent the same person
You are
, and dont told me to remove the draw cuz I dont want the situation to happens again ( ppl arguing abt my face ) or simply for obv privacy reason
You mean you dont want to remove the drawing because the other features blocked out will confirm further that its you.

But of course youve already sent me another image with your eye area without the other features blurred out, and that confirmed “your friend” is you.
 
Schrodinger’s Idiot: Someone who says really stupid things, then decides whether or not he was joking based upon the reaction of people around him.
nga why would have say he has 10 dimo while nobody on earth has never reach 10 dimo ?
“My friend” yet youve made 10+ threads asking the same question if “your friend” looks good or not JFL. Not even including the fact of how much you say “your friend” supposedly mogs
.
Yh ive made 10 thread cuz he asked me , also u prob seen that those thread were getting 2 replie and didnt answered the questions or the issue of his face
Very clearly is you. Same as how the other picture you pmed me is literally identical to “your friend”

You are

You mean you dont want to remove the drawing because the other features blocked out will confirm further that its you.

But of course youve already sent me another image with your eye area without the other features blurred out, and that confirmed “your friend” is you.

I have nct , closer set eyes , diff ear and pfl than him , also I dont want to show my other feature cuz I dont want my face to have the same treatement As his
 
nga why would have say he has 10 dimo while nobody on earth has never reach 10 dimo ?
Because youre low iq, as youve already previously demonstrated multiple times in other posts
Yh ive made 10 thread cuz he asked me , also u prob seen that those thread were getting 2 replie and didnt answered the questions or the issue of his face
Cope nobody is believing this bullshit
I have nct , closer set eyes , diff ear and pfl than him
Really? Then how come in the other picture you sent me it was very clearly “your friend”?
also I dont want to show my other feature cuz I dont want my face to have the same treatement As his
Cope you just dont want the 100% confirmation that its you
 
Because youre low iq, as youve already previously demonstrated multiple times in other posts

Cope nobody is believing this bullshit

Really? Then how come in the other picture you sent me it was very clearly “your friend”?

Cope you just dont want the 100% confirmation that its you
Ur js saying that it is cope , or nobody believe this bs , u js dont have argue and im the only one who is legit to give explaination , I also cannot believe that u took the " 10 dimo " shi seriously like I rlly have to debunk this ? Do u rlly think that I though he was on hexum , drago , cavill dimo? Obv not I have a formula , i alr know what mine and his rating are I was straight joking , if u cannot understand that u either trying to ridiculising me or ur js dumb
 
Ur js saying that it is cope , or nobody believe this bs , u js dont have argue and im the only one who is legit to give explaination
What other argument is there to give? Im saying youre coping and that nobody believes it because thats the truth. The only reason you’re over explaining all this is because everyone knows its your face, and you’re desperately trying to convince others that it isnt.
, I also cannot believe that u took the " 10 dimo " shi seriously like I rlly have to debunk this ? Do u rlly think that I though he was on hexum , drago , cavill dimo?
I honestly dont care if you werent joking or not. Its still your face which is the whole reason im even arguing with you.

Also “hexum, drago, cavill dimo” hmm thats funny, i thought you just said 10 dimo isnt possible but then you listed 3 white people as examples for 10 dimo? Make up your mind boy
Obv not I have a formula, i alr know what mine and his rating are I was straight joking , if u cannot understand that u either trying to ridiculising me or ur js dumb
Calls me dumb yet also paid $7 for some random indian on discord to rate his face, whilst supposedly having a rating formula. Low iq classic

Also whilst i was searching for that 10 dimo post u made i just found this
IMG 9249

IMG 9249
IMG 9250


Literally identical eye areas JFL. I dont even need to get u to send the other eye area pic you sent me anymore :lul: @joao23 @pfl @lastofus123 @Wuzzdio
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Wuzzdio, Reinhard_Heini, joao23 and 1 other person
What other argument is there to give? Im saying youre coping and that nobody believes it because thats the truth. The only reason you’re over explaining all this is because everyone knows its your face, and you’re desperately trying to convince others that it isnt.

I honestly dont care if you werent joking or not. Its still your face which is the whole reason im even arguing with you.

Also “hexum, drago, cavill dimo” hmm thats funny, i thought you just said 10 dimo isnt possible but then you listed 3 white people as examples for 10 dimo? Make up your mind boy

Calls me dumb yet also paid $7 for some random indian on discord to rate his face, whilst supposedly having a rating formula. Low iq classic

Also whilst i was searching for that 10 dimo post u made i just found this
View attachment 4997945View attachment 4997950

Literally identical eye areas JFL. I dont even need to get u to send the other eye area pic you sent me anymore :lul: @joao23 @pfl @lastofus123 @Wuzzdio
Lol when did I said drago cavill and hexum have 10 dimo I said they got the highest do all 3 9,5+ , and also
Ill do it myself lol , View attachment 4997705View attachment 4997706not the as him at all
Not the same eye area at all , not my fault if u dont believe I told u everytime I mention my friend , i specify he is my friend , all the thread ur using he is my friend
 
Lol when did I said drago cavill and hexum have 10 dimo I said they got the highest do all 3 9,5+ , and also
Rate their misc, ang, and harmony
Not the same eye area at all , not my fault if u dont believe I told u everytime I mention my friend , i specify he is my friend , all the thread ur using he is my friend
Cope. No amount of “my friend” is going to change the irrefutable evidence i have that its you
 
Rate their misc, ang, and harmony

Cope. No amount of “my friend” is going to change the irrefutable evidence i have that its you
Misc and ang formula isnt finish , i have hexum at 83 frontal harm , 9,6 dimo and drago 88,9% frontal , 9,53 dimo and ive never done cavill , I have other face data , also all ur evidence are bullshit cuz I always mentioned this wasnt me , I have answered abt all ur arguement on why I joked abt him having 10 dimo , the 13 yrs old shi , why did I made 10 thread of him , eye area etc ... bro js stop cope im not that young black guy u think I am
 
Misc and ang formula isnt finish , i have hexum at 83 frontal harm , 9,6 dimo and drago 88,9% frontal , 9,53 dimo and ive never done cavill , I have other face data ,
Weird, i thought hexum looked like shit according to your other posts. Thanks for admitting to more baiting
also all ur evidence are bullshit cuz I always mentioned this wasnt me
No “wasnt me” for photo evidence that its you. Especially when the other picture you sent me in pms fully confirmed it since you didnt blur out your other features
, I have answered abt all ur arguement on why I joked abt him having 10 dimo , the 13 yrs old shi , why did I made 10 thread of him , eye area etc ... bro js stop cope im not that young black guy u think I am
Only one coping is you buddy
 
Weird, i thought hexum looked like shit according to your other posts. Thanks for admitting to more baiting

No “wasnt me” for photo evidence that its you. Especially when the other picture you sent me in pms fully confirmed it since you didnt blur out your other features

Only one coping is you buddy
YH I think hexum is overrated but I have nothing against him idk him , for photo on both selfie and undisto pic in the mirror , the eye area is different , and no im not coping its js impossible u believe that I said my friend have 10 dimo
 
The purpose of this post is to provide a comprehensive overview of racial and ethnic disparities on cognitive and academic tests in the United States. The primary focus is on black and white Americans because most data focuses on comparing these groups, but I’ll also mention disparities for other groups (mainly Hispanics and Asians) when such data is available. I start by reviewing data on the magnitude of racial disparities in cognitive ability. Next, I consider racial disparities in other kinds of tests, including college admissions and academic achievement tests, finding that these disparities are about as large as disparities in cognitive ability. Then, to better contextualize the magnitude of racial disparities in test scores, I compare racial gaps to gaps between other groups, such as students from different countries or different levels of socioeconomic status. Finally, I present data on the ubiquity of test score gaps, showing that the gaps persist across all levels of education, across all geographical units of analysis, and across all parental socioeconomic levels.

This post is mainly a descriptive exercise. I’m focusing on reviewing the most important uncontroversial observable patterns of racial disparities in test scores. In this post, I don’t concern myself with explanatory questions (e.g., what is the cause of group disparities in cognitive ability?) or with prescriptive questions (e.g., how should we address group disparities in cognitive ability?). Of course, these are important questions, but I avoid them in this post for two reasons: (1) addressing these complex questions responsibly would greatly expand the scope of this post beyond readability, and (2) I believe that, before explaining a phenomenon or prescribing actions in response, one should become acquainted with the basic observational data. If one doesn’t understand the basic patterns of a problem, then one will be unable to interpret these patterns, which means one will be ill-prepared to diagnose the causes of the problem or to propose solutions to the problem. I believe one should be aware of the information in this post before even attempting to try to explain, or propose responses to, racial disparities in test scores.

The magnitude of the gaps​

In this section, I’ll provide data on the size of racial and ethnic gaps on cognitive ability tests. The first subsection will cite various reviews that summarize basic findings from the literature on racial disparities in these tests. The second subsection will directly cite various studies and meta-analyses for more precise measures of the magnitude of such racial disparities. Next, I present data on the racial disparities over time. Finally, I describe some of the statistical implications of such large racial differences in distributions of cognitive ability test scores.

Reviews​

Research on race and IQ has fairly consistently shown that the average IQ score for blacks in the US is about one standard deviation (about 15 points) lower than the average IQ score for whites. In an authoritative report by the APA surveying of the field of intelligence, Neisser et al. 1996 [archived] (page 93) reported the following racial differences in tests of cognitive ability:


Note that this report was written following the release of the controversial book, The Bell Curve. In response, the Board of Scientific Affairs of the APA established a task force of 11 experts on intelligence to prepare the report. Disputes between experts on the task force were all resolved through discussion, resulting in the report having unanimous support of the entire task force. The report has revealed that Hispanics tend to score between blacks and whites, with particularly low scores on verbal subtests:


Similar results were reported in a very brief 3-page statement outlining conclusions regarded as mainstream among researchers on intelligence (Gottfredson 1997 [archived]). The statement was signed by 52 experts in intelligence and allied fields to promote more reasoned discussion of research in the field. The statement reported the following racial and ethnic disparities in cognitive ability (page 14):


A review of group differences in intelligence by Loehlin (2000) also reported similar racial and ethnic differences in cognitive ability. Consistent with prior reviews, this review reports that “An average difference on the order of one standard deviation between U.S. individuals of predominantly European ancestry (Whites) and predominantly African ancestry (Blacks) has been evident ever since the advent of mass intelligence testing” (page 179). The review also notes that Asians tend to score higher than whites on visuo-spatial abilities rather than visual abilities, although there is some dispute as to whether Asians have higher overall scores (page 180).


Similar to Hispanics and Asians, Native Americans, tended to perform better on visuo-spatial tests than verbal tests. However, their overall scores were lower than that of Asians. Thus, while Native Americans tended to perform similarly to European Americans on visuo-spatial tests, they tended to perform worse on verbal tests.


Similar differences are reported in books reviewing more recent data on racial differences in cognitive ability. For example, in a chapter of group differences of intelligence in the book IQ and Human Intelligence, Mackintosh (2011)reported the following on racial and ethnic differences in cognitive ability (page 332):


In Human Intelligence, Hunt (2011) also confirmed the prior results on racial differences in cognitive ability (page 411):


Studies​

A similar gap was observed in a meta-analysis by Roth et al. (2001) [archived]. As far as I know, this is the most recent meta-analysis reporting the magnitude of racial gaps in cognitive ability. The meta-analysis considered studies on racial disparities in general cognitive ability (g) among adults across educational and employment settings. The black-white gap in g hovered at about 1 standard deviation across different settings. The average gap was 1.1 standard deviations across over 6 million individuals pulled from 105 samples. Table 1 shows the magnitude of the gap in standard deviations (see columns for d) across different testing settings. * [ photo 1 ]
.
There were also large gaps in cognitive ability between Hispanics and whites, although the magnitude of the gaps were typically smaller than the gaps between blacks and whites. The Hispanic-white gap hovered at around .7 to .8 standard deviation across over 5 million individuals from 39 samples. [ Tabelle 7 photo 2].
.
The latest iteration of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, WAIS-IV, also shows similar racial disparities in cognitive ability. The following table shows the average IQ by race on the standardization sample of the WAIS-IV as reported in Weiss et al. (2010). The standardization sample used 2,200 people in the United States in 2008 between the ages of 16 and 90 years. Scores are normed to have a mean of 100 points and standard deviation of 15 points.
[ Tabelle 4.3 photo 3 ].
.
  • For reference, FSIQ = Full-scale IQ which is based on the total combined performance of the VCI, PRI, WMI, and PSI. VCI = Verbal Comprehension Index, PRI = Perceptual Reasoning Index, WMI = Working Memory Index, and PSI = Processing Speed Index.
The FSIQ gaps in standard deviation units are as follows:

  • The black-white gap is 103.21 – 88.67 = 14.54 points, or about 14.54/15 = 0.97 standard deviations.
  • The Hispanic-white gap is 103.21 – 91.63 = 11.58 points, or about 11.58/15 = 0.77standard deviations.
  • The Asian-white gap is 106.07 – 103.21= 2.86 points, or about 2.86/15 = 0.19 standard deviations.
These gaps are in line with gaps reported in the meta-analysis by Roth et al.

There are also similar gaps reported in the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, although the gaps are typically smaller in magnitude. The following table shows the average IQ by race in the latest iteration of this test, the WISC-V, as reported by Weiss et al. (2015). The standardization sample was based on 2,200 children in the United States in 2014 between the ages of 6 and 16 years. Like the WAIS-IV, scores are normed to have a mean of 100 points and standard deviation of 15 points.
[ Tabelle 5.3 photo 4 ].

Part 2 incoming soon. View attachment 4980507View attachment 4980519View attachment 4980523View attachment 4980524
Water
 
Me and @davidlaidisme67 are the only high iq blacks
 
  • +1
Reactions: davidlaidisme67 and Reinhard_Heini

Similar threads

james_2006
Replies
7
Views
55
Niebvll
Niebvll
shlong29292
Replies
24
Views
145
GoodOutlook
GoodOutlook
Nathan Fielder
Replies
18
Views
127
quan1
quan1

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top