@thecel’s Complete SMV Quiz v1

[Xangsane]

@Xangsane

My Subhuman Results:

• –38 ATL → 1.795 ATL
• –50 CSA → 1.192 CSA
• –104 BBA → 0.154 BBA

1.592 / 10 SMV

Percentile : 9.347



Yep, the percentile calc’s standard deviation is too big. For an SMV of 1.6/10, I expect the percentile to be below 1%.

−0.200251970707488416395 percentile

 

[Xangsane]

−0.200251970707488416395 percentile

ATL: 9
f(x) = 466.88519295601576520489

CSA: - 50
f(x) = 1.5536240349696360679341

BBA: - 14
f(x) = 3.9647331845934283980775

@thecel

 

[Deleted member 27224]

Yes.

stupid ricecel

 

[5.5psl]

This thread has to be awarded as the most autistic thread ever both worthy tbh

 

[zerotohero]

ATL: -11 ; 3,92

CSA: -35 ; 1,98

BBA: -106 ; 0,14

Teens 19 and younger:
2,94+0,40+0,01=3,35

Women 20 to 24:
2,74+0,40+0,01=3,15

Average (idk about women older than 24): (3,35+3,15)/2=3,25 SMV

Seems accurate. Not subhuman tier, but way below average.

 

[justadude]

touch grass

 

[thecel]

−0.200251970707488416395 percentile

ATL: 9
f(x) = 466.88519295601576520489

CSA: - 50
f(x) = 1.5536240349696360679341

BBA: - 14
f(x) = 3.9647331845934283980775

@thecel

Found the mathscel.

 

[Xangsane]

Found the mathscel.

Lemme calculate them again

 

[Deleted member 15698]

High effort thread but ultimately retarded and useless due to poor weighing decisions.

Being 6’6 only matters as much for sex appeal as having a 6/10 face? Lmao. Being 6’6 doesn’t give you as much sex appeal as being confident? Lmao. White people and Indians have the same sex appeal adjusting for face and height? Lmao.

 

[BongMog]

Dn study

 

[Copeful]

<19: 2.66
20-24: 2.58
25-29: 2.43
30-39: 2.28
>40: 2.19

its over!

 

[thecel]

Lmao. White people and Indians have the same sex appeal adjusting for face and height? Lmao.

Yes. Indians have less sex appeal than Whites because Indians’ faces look worse on average. They have equal sex appeal when adjusting for face, but they don’t have equal cultural and social appeal.

 

[Deleted member 15698]

Yes. Indians have less sex appeal than Whites because Indians’ faces look worse on average. They have equal sex appeal when adjusting for face, but they don’t have equal cultural and social appeal.

Incorrect; take an equally attractive white and Indian face. Women overwhelmingly prefer sex with the White face. Whiteness isn’t only attractive because of its correlation with better features, it is independently attractive as well because women sexually select for White genes

 

[thecel]

equally attractive white and Indian face. Women overwhelmingly prefer sex with the White face.

Then they’re not equally attractive, even if the appeal towards the White face is cultural instead of biological.

My quiz splits “attractiveness” into a biological score and a culturally+socially influenced score.

 

[Deleted member 15698]

Then they’re not equally attractive, even if the appeal towards the White face is cultural instead of biological.

My quiz splits “attractiveness” into a biological score and a culturally+socially influenced score.

Then you including race as a metric but with 0 weighing was methodologically flawed

 

[thecel]

Then you including race as a metric but with 0 weighing was methodologically flawed

No, not 0 weighing. It’s part of the face rating.

If a White guy is 5/10 and a similar-looking Indian guy is less attractive to women because he’s Indian, the Indian guy is 4/10.

The race component in the quiz is only about the mental aspects of race in partner selection—when a woman consciously thinks “I don’t want to date an Indian guy”.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

ATL: -32
CSA: -37
BBA: -30

Function needs to be simpler, not all of us know how to use f(x) type equations.
HUpge props to you because this is incredibly high effort <3

 

[Deleted member 22886]

Roidmaxed

+6

+2

–4

+6 to ATL? wtf

 

[Deleted member 22886]

Function needs to be simpler, not all of us know how to use f(x) type equations.

That't basic math

 

[thecel]

ATL: -32
CSA: -37
BBA: -30

Function needs to be simpler, not all of us know how to use f(x) type equations.

It’s as simple as it gets. I could make it more accurate by using the Gaussian error function instead of a standard sigmoid. I chose to use the sigmoid because it’s simpler than the error function though less accurate.

It needs to be an S-shaped function. Can’t get any simpler than it is.

 

[thecel]

+6 to ATL? wtf

Yes.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

It’s as simple as it gets. I could make it more accurate by using the Gaussian error function instead of a standard sigmoid. I chose to use the sigmoid because it’s simpler than the error function though less accurate.

It needs to be an S-shaped function. Can’t get any simpler than it is.

I think I figured it out.
I got f(x) = 10/1.30119421191 --> 7.685247835 for ATL. I don't think it's right.

 

[Deleted member 22886]

Overall SMV 5.93 65th percentile

 

[Deleted member 15698]

No, not 0 weighing. It’s part of the face rating.

If a White guy is 5/10 and a similar-looking Indian guy is less attractive to women because he’s Indian, the Indian guy is 4/10.

The race component in the quiz is only about the mental aspects of race in partner selection—when a woman consciously thinks “I don’t want to date an Indian guy”.

To which you assigned zero weight. Autistic thinker stembot, you must be Asian or Indian

 

[thecel]

To which you assigned zero weight. Autistic thinker stembot, you must be Asian or Indian

What do you mean by zero weight?

 

[thecel]

have u given any thoughts to become a data scientist or statistician? ur autism could actually be channeled to something productive

💩 The Forum UTTERLY DERAILED From Its Purpose | Looksmax.org Historical Data Exploration

Background Info About The Project Looksmax.org currently has over 725,000 thread IDs. Every thread ID corresponds to a thread that’s posted, which exists now or got deleted. I gathered data from 10,500 randomly sampled forum threads from the 1st up to the 700,000th thread. The samples are...

looksmax.org

 

[Chinacurry]

Good scorecard, remind me of one I made for Gas companies back in the day...