bonesoverblood
137 IQ 《◇》
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2019
- Posts
- 1,152
- Reputation
- 1,382
TD;LR Humans use defensive mimicry
Attraction in humans is, a cross appearance change, to look like predators.
I theorized this, when I noticed that attractive people with hunter eyes and mandibles, etc had weird reactions from dogs. Almost as if it identifies with them.
This goes back to attraction being cross-species, as explained in this research study.
Some common effects with dogs.
Unattractive - Dogs don't see you as a threat, will be generally uninterested in your existence. Will attack or become hostile if touched by you, if you are a stranger.
Attractive - Dogs will stare you down. In the eye. Interaction will depend on gender. Females will run to you, and males will try to dominate. Both are very nice to you, and will not bark at you.
Why does this happen?
Why do prey animals stand us off?
Why is eye contact with wolves, threatening behavior?
Additionally, this cross species correlation, could also be semi-evolutionary. I.E. very attractive people look like distinct animals.
One common facial similarity, is in the wolf.
Hunter eyes, longer maxilla, could be features adapted from more "predatory" animals in the environment. Specifically wild dogs, during critical species development phases.
You can see the similarities, in model sean opry, and this wolf. He looks like a "hunter"
This darwinistic theory, has been proven before. Specifically, the VISUAL aspect of change, is the most prominent in nature. Prey animals changing their appearance, to avoid getting eaten, by looking like predators.
I don't even need to link them here, there are countless examples.
This could explains man's exceptional transition from prey, to predator, in comparison to its "competitors".
One reason why chimps could have never reached, humanistic evolution levels, is due to the lack of predator looks, specifically ones that prevent the downsizing of population. It's entirely intimidation.
This appearance protection, could have allowed homosapiens to thrive, in environments where other primates would have been decimated, search for more high calorie food, walk on land safely, etc.
Over time, primates could have adapted more predator characteristics, such as group hunting, etc, to blend in. All because of looks.
Which is why it's so important in society, in a primitive sense.
Having these looks, means you can stand off predators, and insure the survival of your children.
Not having these features, LOWERS your chance of survival.
You can also look at prehistoric homosapiens, and notice a DRASTIC change in facial structure over time.
Wider Zygos, More defined eye area, longer maxilla:
Thoughts?
Attraction in humans is, a cross appearance change, to look like predators.
I theorized this, when I noticed that attractive people with hunter eyes and mandibles, etc had weird reactions from dogs. Almost as if it identifies with them.
This goes back to attraction being cross-species, as explained in this research study.
Preference for attractive faces is species-specific - PubMed
Studies on facial attractiveness in human adults, infants, and newborns have consistently reported a visual preference for faces rated as attractive compared with faces rated as unattractive. Biological accounts of facial attractiveness have typically presented such preferences as arising from...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Some common effects with dogs.
Unattractive - Dogs don't see you as a threat, will be generally uninterested in your existence. Will attack or become hostile if touched by you, if you are a stranger.
Attractive - Dogs will stare you down. In the eye. Interaction will depend on gender. Females will run to you, and males will try to dominate. Both are very nice to you, and will not bark at you.
Why does this happen?
Why do prey animals stand us off?
Why is eye contact with wolves, threatening behavior?
Additionally, this cross species correlation, could also be semi-evolutionary. I.E. very attractive people look like distinct animals.
One common facial similarity, is in the wolf.
Hunter eyes, longer maxilla, could be features adapted from more "predatory" animals in the environment. Specifically wild dogs, during critical species development phases.
You can see the similarities, in model sean opry, and this wolf. He looks like a "hunter"
This darwinistic theory, has been proven before. Specifically, the VISUAL aspect of change, is the most prominent in nature. Prey animals changing their appearance, to avoid getting eaten, by looking like predators.
I don't even need to link them here, there are countless examples.
This could explains man's exceptional transition from prey, to predator, in comparison to its "competitors".
One reason why chimps could have never reached, humanistic evolution levels, is due to the lack of predator looks, specifically ones that prevent the downsizing of population. It's entirely intimidation.
This appearance protection, could have allowed homosapiens to thrive, in environments where other primates would have been decimated, search for more high calorie food, walk on land safely, etc.
Over time, primates could have adapted more predator characteristics, such as group hunting, etc, to blend in. All because of looks.
Which is why it's so important in society, in a primitive sense.
Having these looks, means you can stand off predators, and insure the survival of your children.
Not having these features, LOWERS your chance of survival.
You can also look at prehistoric homosapiens, and notice a DRASTIC change in facial structure over time.
Wider Zygos, More defined eye area, longer maxilla:
Thoughts?
Last edited: