There are 2 possible outcomes to my life

turkcelfatcel

turkcelfatcel

The creator of Roblox
Joined
Jul 26, 2025
Posts
21,578
Reputation
50,784
1: roped at 25
2: 20 inch bidelt , 6ft 1 , HTN at 20-25
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • JFL
Reactions: grav, GynoGladiator, waterlooengstudent and 12 others
  • +1
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 77427, HundredManSlayer, Deleted member 309720 and 4 others
Anything but thinking about studying for your GSCE's.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 77427, rraymond, Deleted member 121340 and 4 others
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 77427, Deleted member 233773, popocel and 3 others
  • +1
  • WTF
Reactions: Deleted member 77427, tomacōck and turkcelfatcel
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 77427, rraymond, Deleted member 233773 and 3 others
  • +1
  • Woah
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 77427, rraymond, nestivv and 3 others
This is the best way by far. Quitting while you’re ahead. No point letting it drag on worse and worse.
Cut that out not a choice
Embrace the absurd
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 77427, HundredManSlayer, nestivv and 1 other person
is 20 inch bidelt not too small for 6'1
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 77427, nestivv, tomacōck and 1 other person
1: roped at 25
2: 20 inch bidelt , 6ft 1 , HTN at 20-25
Do you ever think about how much better your life would've been it you never knew about any of this.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 77427 and nestivv
Cut that out not a choice
Embrace the absurd
For what reason? Nonbeing is far better than being. The peace you can never achieve is only attained by going to your correct state of nonexistence, absolute nothingness.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 77427, HundredManSlayer and nestivv
Do you ever think about how much better your life would've been it you never knew about any of this.
I would be a fat acnecel ltn

I was depressed either way i have neurochemical shit so wouldnt change anything
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 77427, HundredManSlayer, nestivv and 1 other person
Do you ever think about how much better your life would've been it you never knew about any of this.
Oops! We ran into some problems.
You may only follow a total of 1000 people.
:feelswah:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 77427 and turkcelfatcel
For what reason? Nonbeing is far better than being. The peace you can never achieve is only attained by going to your correct state of nonexistence, absolute nothingness.
1767633934593
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 77427, tomacōck, imontheloose and 1 other person
degreyed
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 77427, tomacōck and turkcelfatcel
For what reason? Nonbeing is far better than being. The peace you can never achieve is only attained by going to your correct state of nonexistence, absolute nothingness.
Nothingness is no state at all
You will never reach that, for being is a certain
Read Aristotle's Metaphysics
While you're here and able to feel then feel as well as you may
Initiate.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 77427, HundredManSlayer and turkcelfatcel
give it your all
either you ascend either you get botched and die it's def worth it no point living a miserable normie slave life and fighting for a cucked existance
 
  • +1
  • WTF
Reactions: Deleted member 77427, HundredManSlayer, tomacōck and 1 other person
Nothingness is no state at all
You will never reach that, for being is a certain
Read Aristotle's Metaphysics
While you're here and able to feel then feel as well as you may
Initiate.
I’ve read it. Not convincing. Nonbeing in regards to consciousness is far simpler than debating whether your scattered remains from a dying star will ever be annihilated and somehow that warrants I persist…
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 77427 and turkcelfatcel
I’ve read it. Not convincing. Nonbeing in regards to consciousness is far simpler than debating whether your scattered remains from a dying star will ever be annihilated and somehow that warrants I persist…
Not convincing? What about the Unmoved Mover? Do you have any points against that?
You're just remorseful in regards to who you turned out as and rot to compensate for your delusion.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 77427 and turkcelfatcel
You're pushing yourself in a ditch. There's more to life. If you give yourself two arbitrary goals then you will lose out. Oh no I'm an incher shorter than my ideal.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 77427, tomacōck and turkcelfatcel
OP's post really put into perspective how little I give a shit about how I look. :fuk:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 77427 and tomacōck
Not convincing? What about the Unmoved Mover? Do you have any points against that?
You're just remorseful in regards to who you turned out as and rot to compensate for your delusion.
The Unmoved Mover is literally just a refusal to explain the world. Aristotle just cuts the line where he wants and frames it as divinity. Baptising your religious dogma in Greek doesn’t impress me.

Absurdism is the modern descendant of the same cowardice.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 77427 and tomacōck
The Unmoved Mover is literally just a refusal to explain the world. Aristotle just cuts the line where he wants and frames it as divinity. Baptising your religious dogma in Greek doesn’t impress me.

Absurdism is the modern descendant of the same cowardice.
You did not present any arguments
You're empty
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 77427 and HundredManSlayer
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 77427 and turkcelfatcel
When you give yourself unrealistic goals you're basically saying 'I wish I was saved'. It's the opposite of eating some hard truthts and making the most of what you got.

Like the retards who think they'll kill themselves when they turn 25. Lol you'll want the same things as before then, if not more.

Never give up on yourself.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 77427 and turkcelfatcel
You did not present any arguments
You're empty
Motion needing a mover now is his key premise. Motion can persist without a mover, it’s called inertia; I shouldn’t have to explain that to you. Physics isn’t teleological like he proposes too. You’re relying on someone who was looking at mumbo jumbo cosmology to justify this all, we have evolved past that.

I assume you’ll backpedal to motion = change like all his lovers do to wiggle out of this, but that’s no longer a physical claim, so I cannot help you there if you’ve convinced yourself of it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 77427
How about both?
 
Motion needing a mover now is his key premise. Motion can persist without a mover, it’s called inertia; I shouldn’t have to explain that to you. Physics isn’t teleological like he proposes too. You’re relying on someone who was looking at mumbo jumbo cosmology to justify this all, we have evolved past that.

I assume you’ll backpedal to motion = change like all his lovers do to wiggle out of this, but that’s no longer a physical claim, so I cannot help you there if you’ve convinced yourself of it.
How stupid are you
What causes inertia
Previous motion
What is previous motion caused by? A mover
Potential cannot actualize itself
 
How stupid are you
What causes inertia
Previous motion
What is previous motion caused by? A mover
Potential cannot actualize itself
Inertia isn’t an event that needs some producer. Previous motion is caused by earlier interactions; momentum exists, so we needn’t an interaction to continue that. All that needs explaining is why it changes, not why it doesn’t.

You can’t just assert motion must be produced by a mover when it’s the claim under debate. In physics, we don’t talk in “potentiality” or “actuality” lol. This is woefully outdated stuff. Even if it’s granted, it doesn’t entail his Unmoved Mover.
 
I would be a fat acnecel ltn

I was depressed either way i have neurochemical shit so wouldnt change anything
Id imagine ignorance is bliss but I guess it doesn't apply here
 
Inertia isn’t an event that needs some producer. Previous motion is caused by earlier interactions; momentum exists, so we needn’t an interaction to continue that. All that needs explaining is why it changes, not why it doesn’t.

You can’t just assert motion must be produced by a mover when it’s the claim under debate. In physics, we don’t talk in “potentiality” or “actuality” lol. This is woefully outdated stuff. Even if it’s granted, it doesn’t entail his Unmoved Mover.
Claiming that potential is outdated already puts you on my ignore list
 

Similar threads

filthycurrycel
Replies
16
Views
101
miserycel
miserycel
ugly_man
Replies
0
Views
26
ugly_man
ugly_man
brotato78
Replies
14
Views
82
łtn
łtn
simematic
Replies
26
Views
134
simematic
simematic
sync!
Replies
30
Views
152
mangotimer
mangotimer

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top