Rapelord
Iron
- Joined
- May 2, 2025
- Posts
- 57
- Reputation
- 48
The primary cause, origin of the current struggle is found not in how we look, but how we fail to meet the standards of the privileged females who latch onto their continually fed egos for pleasure, and delude themselves with their own images of what a relationship should be, and what male they deserve. The privileges they possess socially in comparison to us are unfounded, yet we are obliged to embrace a struggle to perhaps be even slightly capable of receiving superficial affection. Females in modernity are not capable of true love. No matter how much one can be loving, no matter how endless a passion, a will and a commitment to someone is, true love cannot exist under the current conditions. Rather than focusing on amplifying one's physical appearance merely to please the dominating gender, the females, who are in that position unnaturally and contradicting nature, we should eliminate the broader cultural and societal root, by arming ourselves and launching physical assaults upon those responsible. Although I am in no way opposed to the improving of looks, simply for better reason it is justified, for the pursuit of beauty. If you only desire sex, sex can be bought and you have no reason to be concerned about a relationship unless you really desire a false illusion of mutual love, which is really temporary and subject to conditions. This is a matter of what you value, do you value love in its highest form, the most beautiful thing that can exist, or do you value the momentary approval of others which will amount to nothing in the end.
For example;
Islamic societies in the Middle-East
Throughout the history of the Muslim religion and the emergence of the Arab people, one notable characteristic of their societies is their effective means of treating women. In contrast to the modern and globalised expression of women, particularly in social media where they flaunt their bodies and defile themselves for attention, due to the aforesaid pleasure and ego, in devout Islamic society women are instructed to dress modestly, and to respect themselves and those around them. It is the bare minimum to do so, and it is absurd to suggest otherwise, but I am not implying they should be entirely covered necessarily but I do praise this aspect of Arab culture. How can you love a woman with all your heart knowing she is disobedient, disloyal and feels herself attracted to other males, such as that found in current hypergamy? It is disgusting and unacceptable, such traits are not tolerated in this example.
Tibetan/Vajrayana/Mahayana Buddhism
Similar to how in Europe, females were exchanged by the nobility and even lower-class families in arranged marriages to the benefit of the male in the marriage, in Tibet a similar arrangement occurred. As the Buddha’s empire of Tibet was a highly religious and spiritual region, women formed into their natural role as they should as a participant in supposed metaphysical or ‘religious’ practices. What is fundamental, the point of what I attempt to outline, is the position of the female as entirely subordinate to the male, as committed to him. In love, the female conforms to the interests of and exalts the male individual they love, and everything about him. Aspects of enslaving women can be found in this example, and in many cultures. Countless philosophers named women as animals, and they were considered that until very recent and rapid transformations in our culture. Not many women are above that name, and it is understandable why intellectuals of the past employed it. Females simply lack basic intelligence and empathy.
When true love is conceived, the fantasy of romance, mutual provision of affection, mutual feelings, is it truly possible in the reality of now? The hope of a ‘soulmate’ that one perfectly connects and gets along with. It seems most relationships are a game rather than anything more. I propose the coming of the Thousand Year ‘Reich’, brought forth by the ultimate avatar Adolf Hitler, his heroic knights Elliot Rodger, a Chinese-Irish warrior, Oskar Dirlewanger, Anton Long, the great philosopher Gatis, Evola, and all those capable of refusing the temptations of the feminine lunar demiurge, the foid gynocracy that owns the emerging new world order. All females are agents of the Abrahamic godhead and only seek to enslave you, counteract them and enslave them instead. Do you not realise that if you think this hostility towards women is excessive, that it is actually beneficial to them, as if we withdraw the privileges we have culturally allowed them, they will then be purified, and the golden age will be ushered in? Rally upon these words.
Think about this too, there are an abundance of male ‘incels’, billions living lowly, lonely lives, why? Not everyone can be that unlucky surely? The reason is society. Look at the statistics from 1955 in regards to dating or couples, you can see how things were before the females were impure. It can be reversed, and maybe our grandchildren will enjoy a better world.
Hail Lucifer
For example;
Islamic societies in the Middle-East
Throughout the history of the Muslim religion and the emergence of the Arab people, one notable characteristic of their societies is their effective means of treating women. In contrast to the modern and globalised expression of women, particularly in social media where they flaunt their bodies and defile themselves for attention, due to the aforesaid pleasure and ego, in devout Islamic society women are instructed to dress modestly, and to respect themselves and those around them. It is the bare minimum to do so, and it is absurd to suggest otherwise, but I am not implying they should be entirely covered necessarily but I do praise this aspect of Arab culture. How can you love a woman with all your heart knowing she is disobedient, disloyal and feels herself attracted to other males, such as that found in current hypergamy? It is disgusting and unacceptable, such traits are not tolerated in this example.
Tibetan/Vajrayana/Mahayana Buddhism
Similar to how in Europe, females were exchanged by the nobility and even lower-class families in arranged marriages to the benefit of the male in the marriage, in Tibet a similar arrangement occurred. As the Buddha’s empire of Tibet was a highly religious and spiritual region, women formed into their natural role as they should as a participant in supposed metaphysical or ‘religious’ practices. What is fundamental, the point of what I attempt to outline, is the position of the female as entirely subordinate to the male, as committed to him. In love, the female conforms to the interests of and exalts the male individual they love, and everything about him. Aspects of enslaving women can be found in this example, and in many cultures. Countless philosophers named women as animals, and they were considered that until very recent and rapid transformations in our culture. Not many women are above that name, and it is understandable why intellectuals of the past employed it. Females simply lack basic intelligence and empathy.
When true love is conceived, the fantasy of romance, mutual provision of affection, mutual feelings, is it truly possible in the reality of now? The hope of a ‘soulmate’ that one perfectly connects and gets along with. It seems most relationships are a game rather than anything more. I propose the coming of the Thousand Year ‘Reich’, brought forth by the ultimate avatar Adolf Hitler, his heroic knights Elliot Rodger, a Chinese-Irish warrior, Oskar Dirlewanger, Anton Long, the great philosopher Gatis, Evola, and all those capable of refusing the temptations of the feminine lunar demiurge, the foid gynocracy that owns the emerging new world order. All females are agents of the Abrahamic godhead and only seek to enslave you, counteract them and enslave them instead. Do you not realise that if you think this hostility towards women is excessive, that it is actually beneficial to them, as if we withdraw the privileges we have culturally allowed them, they will then be purified, and the golden age will be ushered in? Rally upon these words.
Think about this too, there are an abundance of male ‘incels’, billions living lowly, lonely lives, why? Not everyone can be that unlucky surely? The reason is society. Look at the statistics from 1955 in regards to dating or couples, you can see how things were before the females were impure. It can be reversed, and maybe our grandchildren will enjoy a better world.
Hail Lucifer
