This article proves why European women are more attractive.

[Deleted member 7580]

They still mog brown women
View attachment 760050

Average girl in Toronto ? @Golang @sytyl

 

[Back Alley Boy]

 

[brutal_blackpill]

99.9999999999999% tbh
View attachment 760047

Makeup fraud. She's wearing makeup there. The true picture without makeup is already posted above.

 

[brutal_blackpill]

I don’t find Taylor swift attractive even with makeup but honestly I’d pick post prime Margot without makeup over 90% ethnic girls

Thoughts @Latebloomer10 ?

edit: 99.9999%, she look good in other pics without makeup

No, she's just wearing slight makeup in the other pics, or is angle and lighting frauding.

 

[Deleted member 9771]

Makeup fraud. She's wearing makeup there. The true picture without makeup is already posted above.

Why are you pretending non-white chicks don't wear makeup and fraud?

 

[brutal_blackpill]

Why are you pretending non-white chicks don't wear makeup and fraud?

Never said they don't

 

[johncruz12345]

Yeah. I think so I always found white girls most attractive even at like 5 years old.

 

[Deleted member 9771]

Never said they don't

so what are you trying to prove?european women look far better even when both are frauding.As for without makeup you are just cherrypicking both look pretty shit without.

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

Very flawed theory also this doesn't explain why european men are more attractive Also most of this should also apply to hunter gatherers of other races.

The only Hunter gatherers that defy this are the Negritoes of Andamans and Australian Aborigines.

But they are primitive racial populations.

Negroes of Africa are similar to the Negritoes of Andamans. But Negroes are better looking because of sexual selection. Negroes are notorious for their hypersexuality hence people with #1 aids.

This sexual selection means better looking people will always be preferred, they will have a stronger sense of what's "better looking", more ideas and tastes of constitutes as "better looking".

Europeans might have been more warring.
Warring tribes would have had leader male more handsome and masculine than the rest who commanded their respect.

When they terrorized other tribes they might have rayped the best looking women.

Sons inherit half of their genes from their mothers. Handsome leader from tribe A rayping best looking woman from tribe B = more good looking children.

Also Europeans have more defined facial features.

You can "work on" and "improve" a shape with more definition.

Another theory is that you get a 1000 random mutations giving you a 1000 different faces.

For whatever reason 1 face is chosen over the rest for being better looking. That creates a tendency and a preference.

Everything else from then on is just an "add on" a development/progression from that.

Aesthetic awareness is important too. Europeans in general have more sophisticated tastes for cuisine, fashion, art/photography and music.

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

Imo communication skills would be more important than height, muscles or face in a Hunter gatherer environment
The nigga who could make more friends would probably be the most powerful
At the end of the day the subhumans could get together and make a deal to kill the local chad and then divide the women in a reasonable manner to avoid more killings
There's many possibilities for humans, its much more complicated than it is for lions or peacocks

Nice try.

Let's see a ricecel nerd try to make friends with people to eliminate a White Jock.

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

View attachment 760015

Mogged by brown girls with no makeup
View attachment 760016
Muh evolution. White faces aren’t better than others. It’s called social conditioning since birth.

The Indian you posted is Caucasoid and very close to Southern European-Iranian facial features.

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

View attachment 760030
Keep worshipping these subhumans like the little subhuman cuck that you are.

That's just facial puffyness.

The look that you get when you just wake up from bed. Putting on an ice pack clears it up.

 

[Deleted member 4671]

t. curry

are u a pashtan? most pakistanis are curries jfl

 

[Deleted member 9355]

just look at female birds vs male birds:

The utter mog those male birds have to go through tho

 

[jewelsandtools]

The Indian you posted is Caucasoid and very close to Southern European-Iranian facial features.

She has european dna, there’s a lot of admixture in the Middle East

Muh indo-caucasoid cope, muh euro dna, this forum needs to stop this.

You guys will argue in detail about why you think white is the best but when someone puts something non-white that is half-way attractive the first thing you say is "oh she's caucasoid" "oh he's mixed" "oh that's 1 in a million outlier"

You know for a fact that this woman would not be considered white by ANYONE in Europe and if she tried to come up to a group of white people and claimed that she was white too they would look at her funny so you can't flip this response to in your favour.

It's crazy how on these forums people try to claim every good-looking Indian/Arab they see is white. I know some Arabs look completely white but 95% of brown people look brown because they are brown.

Even most pale-skinned Arabs you can still tell they are non-white from their features. Your definition of white is "are they good looking? if yes, then they must be white".

You would think half the world is white with the amount of BS that is spoken on in this forum honestly. Just accept non-whites can be as good looking as white people.

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

Muh indo-caucasoid cope muh euro dna, this forum needs to stop this.

You guys will argue in detail about why you think white is the best but when someone puts something non-white that is half-way attractive the first thing you say is "oh she's caucasoid" "oh he's probably mixed" "oh he's 1 in a million outlier"

You know for a fact that this woman would not be considered white by ANYONE in Europe and if she tried to come up to a group of white people and claimed that she was white too they would look at her funny so you can't flip this response to your argument in your favour.

It's crazy how here on these forums you would find people trying to claim every good-looking Indian/Arab they see is white when they would never call themselves white. I know some Arabs look completely white but 95% of brown people look brown because they are brown. Even pale skinned Arabs you can tell they are still brown from their features.

You would think half the world is white with the amount of coping that goes on in this forum honestly. Just accept non-whites can be as good looking as white people.

Cover her eyes with a black bar.

Mix her pictures together with darker Whites and regular Whites.

Ask Whites to rate them.

Then reveal her true picture without the black bar without revealing anything.

If a White person says "oh she doesn't look White" Then you are right.

I'm Tamil and Tamils never know that I'm Tamil when I speak to them in English. They think I'm North Indian. Even though I look nothing like an Aryan Indian. I blame it on me being GL. I'm actually Australoid. My mother is very very Australoid. My father is Indo Melanid(Caucasoid-Australoid mix). So that makes me more Australoid than Caucasoid.

I've asked White Brazilian normies online to rate me and they say "oh you look Brazilian" and I asked them "you mean like Negro mulatto?" and they said no. I don't trust them because Brazil is a mutt country. An Argentinian probably has a more objective answer.

 

[Deleted member 2012]

@brbbrah @TheCopefulCurry I told you these mole rats are low IQ. This man just said there’s white admixture in the Middle East and thinks Pakistan is part of the ME.

I don’t think Pakistan is in the Middle East.

I was just saying that towards the direction of the middle East and surrounding areas, even as far as the north of india, you can find european admixture.

There are people with brown hair and some people with light eyes in these regions and we know for a fact that these traits originated in Europe so it’s pretty obvious

 

[GymcelDoomer]

@brbbrah @TheCopefulCurry I told you these mole rats are low IQ. This man just said there’s white admixture in the Middle East and thinks Pakistan is part of the ME.

Pakistan borders Afghanistan and Iran. India doesn't. Hence there's a significant admixture among Pakistnais particularly in the Northern region like Gilgit Baltistan, KPK, Peshawar etc.

< Children in Gilgit, Pakistan. Do they look curry?



Here's a kid from Gilgit. He's as white as the snow in the background. Fun fact, Gilgit used to belong to India under an Indian government but in 1963 a tribe of Pashtuns invaded and annexed it. It's now under Pakistani control. Pajeets have been seething ever since demanding Pakistan give back ownership to them.

 

[Copeful]

@Biggdink can you make an apology thread on me? Or i'll have to eviscerate you horrible like nordiciranian

caged at sig jfl

 

[goat2x]

the white girl is in the middle 50% range
the brown girl is in the top 15% for brown girls

I don’t find Taylor swift attractive even with makeup but honestly I’d pick post prime Margot without makeup over 90% ethnic girls

Thoughts @Latebloomer10 ?

edit: 99.9999%, she look good in other pics without makeup

Nah tbh
one pic or one tiktok can prove a whole racepill ngl
prime looksmax users

 

[Baldingman1998]

Scandinavian women are likely the most beautiful in the entire world.

The vikings were pretty recent so the genetic make up of the population is pretty much the same as nowadays, do you think this is ugly?

View attachment 759966

Real viking women

 

[6’1cel]

(PDF) European hair and eye color: A case of frequency-dependent sexual selection?

PDF | Human hair and eye color is unusually diverse in northern and eastern Europe. The many alleles involved (at least seven for hair color) and their... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate

www.researchgate.net

TLDR:

As we all know, throughout the animal kingdom, females are responsible for sexual selection.

Males have a high sex drive and an instinct to spread their seed far and wide, therefore they will always want to mate at all times with any woman.

While females have a lower sex drive and an instinct to choose the best partner to mate with, since pregnancy and birth is a very a very time and energy consuming task, it drives them to be very selective as to who they will make this huge investment with.

This results in a very high amount of sexual dimorphism in males, but not in females, just look at female birds vs male birds:

View attachment 759806
View attachment 759808
View attachment 759811
View attachment 759813

The male birds are always cool looking, while the females are bland. Why?

Because the males were the only ones getting selected for their looks and while all females get to reproduce, resulting in this difference.

Only male lions have manes:

View attachment 759816

Only male deer have antlers:

View attachment 759817

Throughout the entire animal kingdom it's like this. And for most of human history it was the same with us too. There was a point when only 1 in 17 males got to reproduce while all females were passing their genes. The alpha male gigachad had a massive harem and 95% of men were incels.

However, something happened with European hunter gatherers. Women became increasingly dependent on men to do the hunting for them, and the alpha male, as good of a hunter as he was, couldn't hunt for 20 females. Women needed the other men to do the hunting for them.

But the other men weren't cucks, they wouldn't provide for a female who was sleeping with other men. This forced women to start having monogamous relationships with non chads.

This doesn't apply to Lions. The lionesses are the ones who do all of the hunting. The alpha male just gets fed by them and only uses his strength to fight off other males.

This also doesn't apply to deer. The female deer doesn't need anyone to provide for her, her food is just grass.

So the females in these species were free to indulge in hypergamy to the maximum.

Unlike human females, who depended on a male provider for survival.

There is one more factor that goes into this equation. Since men were the ones doing all of the hunting and protecting, they put themselves at risk a lot more often and therefore had a much higher death rate. Meaning that, by the time they reached adulthood, there ended up being many more women than men alive. 57 men to 100 women to be exact.

But life was tough back then, men could only really provide for one woman and the kids. So obviously, they chose to provide only for the most beautiful women.

For the first time in history, MEN WERE THE ONES DOING THE SELECTION

This is what is responsible for European women being so much more attractive than woman elsewhere. This is also what is responsible for the evolution and spread of different colours of hair and eyes.

TLDR of TLDR: During thousands of years of evolutions European women experienced higher levels of sexual selection than any other group.

didnt read, but its because men have higher sex drives

 

[pakipassion]

View attachment 760015

Mogged by brown girls with no makeup
View attachment 760016
Muh evolution. White faces aren’t better than others. It’s called social conditioning since birth.

she is lighter paki , this girl is better example of browner paki, still i dont see a massive mog, both look decent in their own way.

 

[Baldingman1998]

Imo communication skills would be more important than height, muscles or face in a Hunter gatherer environment
The nigga who could make more friends would probably be the most powerful
At the end of the day the subhumans could get together and make a deal to kill the local chad and then divide the women in a reasonable manner to avoid more killings
There's many possibilities for humans, its much more complicated than it is for lions or peacocks

That's literally what happened lol. Why does you think religion exists? For enforcement of monogamy obviously.

 

[pakipassion]

@brbbrah @TheCopefulCurry I told you these mole rats are low IQ. This man just said there’s white admixture in the Middle East and thinks Pakistan is part of the ME.

pakistan might not be in middle east , but indo european ancestry is much higher in pakistan than in middle east this is because of aryans that migrated to indus valley.

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

Pakistan borders Afghanistan and Iran. India doesn't. Hence there's a significant admixture among Pakistnais particularly in the Northern region like Gilgit Baltistan, KPK, Peshawar etc.

View attachment 760926 View attachment 760928 < Children in Gilgit, Pakistan. Do they look curry?



Here's a kid from Gilgit. He's as white as the snow in the background. Fun fact, Gilgit used to belong to India under an Indian government but in 1963 a tribe of Pashtuns invaded and annexed it. It's now under Pakistani control. Pajeets have been seething ever since demanding Pakistan give back ownership to them.

High Caste North Indians mog Pakis to the pits of hell

 

[GymcelDoomer]

High Caste North Indians mog Pakis to the pits of hell

its over for your coping ass

 

[normal boy]

I didn't read everything tbh, but considering we are humans, why didn't the subhumans simply kill the gigachad who is getting all the pussy?
If I was a hunter gatherer I would simply kill the local gigachad with a stone or something lol

same bro fuck this blackpill bullshit