xye
still getting butterflies every once in a while
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2026
- Posts
- 3,523
- Reputation
- 4,622
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
she’s got quite the chin as well man jesus christ
yeah shes so annoying cant even let JaW speakThis bitch denied both logic and metaphysics
View attachment 5556925
She’s trolling + a womanyeah shes so annoying cant even let JaW speak
'how do you know it has no potency????' 50x
literally the worst person to ever debate him jfl
i mean as a christian i think JaW is very good at articulating the cosmological argument but man this debate is fucking retarded it's actual brainrot when i clicked on it i expected somethign like the debate with natefm where it was at least civilized and respectful even if nate's arguments were horrible and he clearly lostShe’s trolling + a woman
As an atheist our PR is tanked. Bitch is legit going to be clipped and JaW is going to be framed as the composed logical guy and she’s going to be seen as a cringey idiot
The dark ages are upon us
View attachment 5556937
I saw her lives and knew it’d be ass, she doesn’t have logical arguments she just plays a character and is condescending with millennial humor.i mean as a christian i think JaW is very good at articulating the cosmological argument but man this debate is fucking retarded it's actual brainrot when i clicked on it i expected somethign like the debate with natefm where it was at least civilized and respectful even if nate's arguments were horrible and he clearly lost
one of his other opponents denied the principle of sufficient reason![]()
there is no god of the gaps though here, a first cause must be an uncaused causer that is therefore eternal, and not limited in powerI saw her lives and knew it’d be ass, she doesn’t have logical arguments she just plays a character and is condescending with millennial humor.
JAW’s argument isn’t as concrete as he thinks either, like she is trying to point out it runs into the god of the gaps problem if the argument WAS true but it’s not even true to begin with
Classical theism has already been disproven idk why people debate they might as well just say “it’s unprovable” like they used to lol
God would need a cause toofirst cause must be an uncaused causer that is therefore eternal, and not limited in power


God does not need a cause since he is a necessary being because by definition he is the first cause. if 'he' was caused then it would not be God and there would be a cause preceding it and the first cause would still have to be an eternal limitless being (God).God would need a cause too
whatever logic and argument you use to explain why god doesn’t need a first cause and be used to explain the universe. Pantheism is more logical than classical theism
Also quantum physics shows random things happening too. Also even if there was a first cause we don’t know if it would be some sort of being. So many holes in that argument. Catholics eat up hype moments from farming against low ranked atheists who began atheists from family trauma and rage against the faith
Problem of suffering from a utilitarian perspective still hasn’t been disproven either![]()
Yeah what says so?God does not need a cause since he is a necessary being because by definition he is the first cause. if 'he' was caused then it would not be God and there would be a cause preceding it and the first cause would still have to be an eternal limitless being.
no I’m not granting you deism. Problem of suffering from my perspective dismantles classical theism entirely. But I’ll hear you out on this, I’d like you to respond to this one over the first cause rebuttal thoalso problem of suffering doesn't debunk the existence of God, though i'm willing to explain it as a christian i'd just prefer to establish deism at least before getting to that
there will eventually be a first cause and that first cause is GodInfinites are logically possible. There is nothing that distinguishes god from being another cause other than you saying he is the first cause. Explain why.
from a perspective that does not assume an all loving god suffering can be justno I’m not granting you deism. Problem of suffering from my perspective dismantles classical theism entirely. But I’ll hear you out on this, I’d like you to respond to this one over the first cause rebuttal tho
If he was gonna do that eventually then he should’ve just did that. I reject the idea that eventual paradise can justify the suffering here. Logically it makes little sense. But I’m glad we can agree that it’s only right for a paradise to exist under this frameworkfrom a perspective that does not assume an all loving god suffering can be just
as a christian though i am universalist meaning that i think hell is a purgatorial phase that those who weren't saved in their lives here experience, meaning that everyone will eventually have never-ending paradise, which surpasses all former suffering
eventual paradise > immediate paradise because of the contrast between suffering and beatitudeIf he was gonna do that eventually then he should’ve just did that. I reject the idea that eventual paradise can justify the suffering here. Logically it makes little sense. But I’m glad we can agree that it’s only right for a paradise to exist under this framework
Why is this needed? Could it be that it brings you joy? The joy that you could already receive in a perfect state of bliss?because of the contrast between suffering and beatitude
if you did 10 hours of hard labor then did something freeing or enjoyable that thing would be more enjoyable after the hard labor than just doing that thingWhy is this needed? Could it be that it brings you joy? The joy that you could already receive in a perfect state of bliss?
If an omnipotent god gave me infinite joy full all of eternity then I would jsut feel the joy from that relief without the need to suffer..if you did 10 hours of hard labor then did something freeing or enjoyable that thing would be more enjoyable after the hard labor than just doing that thing
logic and metaphysics are just our own mental constructs, they don't exist in objective reality.This bitch denied both logic and metaphysics
View attachment 5556925
It’s not necessary but it’s betterIf an omnipotent god gave me infinite joy full all of eternity then I would jsut feel the joy from that relief without the need to suffer..
Suffering isn’t needed for greater joy. This analogy isn’t comparable on a metaphysical level, also don’t you forget the suffering in heaven anyways![]()
they’re mental constructs used to explain/ question reality? What is this comment even trying to say. What a dumbass wannabe smart commentlogic and metaphysics are just our own mental constructs, they don't exist in objective reality.
just because it doesn't exist in reality, thus its a shit tool for explaining reality?? lmfaothey’re mental constructs used to explain/ question reality? What is this comment even trying to say. What a dumbass wannabe smart comment![]()
No it’s not. This is such a weak argument.Triumph over evil is better than there never being evil

What does this comment even mean?just because it doesn't exist in reality, thus its a shit tool for explaining reality?? lmfao
it means your metaphysics and logic are fucking shitWhat does this comment even mean?
Ur using logic (or attempting to) rn idiotit means your metaphysics and logic are fucking shit
i don't use itUr using logic (or attempting to) rn idiot
When you speak in opposition to me to explain that logic is stipid and irrelevant you are paradoxically using logic and reasoning. Just bend kneei don't use it
in short: no, god doesn't exist. its a social construct.
i use my instincts, not reasoning nor logicWhen you speak in opposition to me to explain that logic is stipid and irrelevant you are paradoxically using logic and reasoning. Just bend knee
Lmaoi use my instincts, not reasoning nor logic