This nih article that states hgh combined with test has no difference in bone increase compared to test alone. Thoughts

C

chunkichungi

Iron
Joined
May 4, 2024
Posts
86
Reputation
25

Says that human growth hormone does not accentuate the bone mass increasing effects of testosterone.

If the only goal is to increase bone mass, is hgh worth it for the high price.

In the article it does look like they use a very low dose of hgh though but I’m not sure.

Thoughts?
 
1758825002981
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Luca_.

Says that human growth hormone does not accentuate the bone mass increasing effects of testosterone.

If the only goal is to increase bone mass, is hgh worth it for the high price.

In the article it does look like they use a very low dose of hgh though but I’m not sure.

Thoughts?
" T treatment in all subjects for 2 years increased trabecular BVF by 9.6% (P < .0001), trabecular thickness by 2.6% (P < .001), and trabecular AS by 9.8% (P < .001). In contrast, testosterone treatment in all subjects significantly increased cortical thickness by 2.4% (P < .01) but decreased cortical BVF by −4.7% (P < .01) and cortical AS by −6.9% (P < .01).", The two-year testosterone treatment had a positive effect on the trabecular bone, increasing its mass, thickness, and overall strength.
However, the treatment had a mixed/potentially negative effect on the cortical bone: while it made the outer layer thicker, it resulted in a decrease in the cortical bone volume fraction (density) and a decrease in its mechanical strength.
 

Similar threads

fushisushi
Replies
19
Views
3K
greycelldude
greycelldude
BWC
Replies
53
Views
4K
TiTokCell
TiTokCell
7evenvox22
Replies
41
Views
4K
Sachlichkeit
Sachlichkeit
HtnGymcel
Replies
14
Views
842
amiok
amiok

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top