Aㅤㅤㅤ
ㅤㅤㅤ
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2026
- Posts
- 594
- Reputation
- 1,120
Title.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
It’s alright, better than communismTitle.
How so?It’s alright, better than communism
Don't care about capitalism? Or?modern society shit
dont care about it
Communism has never worked for a reason. It’s a ok idea in theory but would never work in real lifeHow so?
You cannot claim communism failed in practice when the actual system was never even established.Communism has never worked for a reason.
For a reason brother. No one genuinely wants communismYou cannot claim communism failed in practice when the actual system was never even established.
You didn't provide the reason...? Simply asserting that no one wants it proves nothing.For a reason brother. No one genuinely wants communism![]()
Communism generally removes individual inncentives, it destroys any incentive to work hard. Removing private property also removes the incentive to maximize its use. When no one "owns" it no one will take care of it. To make any of this work you need a dictatorship to force people to do so.You didn't provide the reason...? Simply asserting that no one wants it proves nothing.
Category error.Communism generally removes individual inncentives, it destroys any incentive to work hard. Removing private property also removes the incentive to maximize its use.
No? That's a thoroughly debunked economic fallacy. There are quite literally centuries of successful collective stewardship and usufruct (the right to utilize resources without destroying them).When no one "owns" it no one will take care of it.
This is just reification.To make any of this work you need a dictatorship to force people to do so.
look man dnr. I’m too busy trying to give this nigga advice on braces rnCategory error.
Why are you conflating private property with personal property? Private property is STRICTLY limited to the socially alienable means of production, which is entirely distinct from your personal possessions.
No? That's a thoroughly debunked economic fallacy. There are quite literally centuries of successful collective stewardship and usufruct (the right to utilize resources without destroying them).
This is just reification.
You're taking the alienated wage labor of capitalism and then making it seem as if it's an immutable law of human nature. Humans naturally desire productive, self-directed activity when they actually control the fruits of their labor instead of just having their surplus value expropriated by a capitalist.