Thoughts on victim blaming?

Thoughts


  • Total voters
    15
Aladin

Aladin

Fuchsia
Joined
Jul 20, 2022
Posts
13,437
Reputation
15,789
If a woman dresses like a slut and gets raped, does she deserve to be raped?

If Charlie Kirk argues for guns to be legal, does he deserve to be shot?
 
  • +1
  • WTF
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 85787, proxyy, auitistsurvior and 2 others
Charlie got his throat knocked off his body stick into the seat
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Thief
If a woman dresses like a slut and gets raped, does she deserve to be raped?

If Charlie Kirk argues for guns to be legal, does he deserve to be shot?
First one is no
Second one is yes
 
He didn't deserve to die but I still support political violence as a means
 
  • +1
Reactions: takethewhitepill
stop wasting all our time. He never advocated violence.
Lmfaoooo yeah
He didn't advocate for the killing of innocent people at all
Especially not kids who go to school and brown kids
 
Lmfaoooo yeah
He didn't advocate for the killing of innocent people at all
Especially not kids who go to school and brown kids
He didn’t retard.
 
  • +1
Reactions: takethewhitepill
If a woman dresses like a slut and gets raped, does she deserve to be raped?

If Charlie Kirk argues for guns to be legal, does he deserve to be shot?
The legality of guns in USA doesn't invite gun violence in the same way dressing like a whore invites being raped. Regardless of whether or not guns are legal in the US they're not going away. The only thing keeping fully automatic weapons out of the hands of American civilians is the legal status of semi automatic weapons. If you outlaw firearms in America there's nothing left to stop us from beginning to acquire and keep fully automatic weapons. Might as well at that point because we're not giving our guns up.
 
  • +1
Reactions: takethewhitepill and Aladin
Charlie got his throat knocked off his body stick into the seat
How do you feel about America being discrimination in its policies of immigration
 
The legality of guns in USA doesn't invite gun violence in the same way dressing like a whore invites being raped. Regardless of whether or not guns are legal in the US they're not going away. The only thing keeping fully automatic weapons out of the hands of American civilians is the legal status of semi automatic weapons. If you outlaw firearms in America there's nothing left to stop us from beginning to acquire and keep fully automatic weapons. Might as well at that point because we're not giving our guns up.
Agreed.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lefty Rankin
How do you feel about America being discrimination in its policies of immigration
I'm anti-immigration
Charlie was pro-immigration thru supporting capitalism and jews
I think everybody should stay in their country and enjoy the fruits of their country resources

Wow but wait, there is jews and white brah stealing resources from all these countries by installing people at that country that rides them and forces people to immigrate for better quality of life
 
  • +1
Reactions: takethewhitepill
Mentally Ill White guy kills a White guy.
 
Nobody deserves anything by our judgement, but we should be reasonable here. It is an equivocation fallacy to compare someone 'deserving' something here, a woman can lower her chances of being raped by choosing not to make several bad decisions leading up to it. She doesn't deserve to have something happen to her but the way it is used is to mean she should expect that there is the risk. Charlie Kirk knew the risk and chose to do what he believed was right, and have open and honest dialogue even if we disagree. He would 'deserve' it the same way if he had no security checks for example, but even then that isn't how the word is being used. It is to say it is a justified killing, which we can all disagree with the same way a man is not justified in raping a woman.

If you see a crackhead with a knife screaming about wanting to stab someone and you walk up to him and start arguing, you don't deserve to be killed but you do deserve the direct outcomes of your actions.

Deserving something is not a moral claim, nor does it have bearing on whether we are sympathetic, but we can look at statistics and say someone who failed to have the foresight to act rationally is a fool.
 
Lmfaoooo yeah
He didn't advocate for the killing of innocent people at all
Especially not kids who go to school and brown kids
link the clip of him doing this or you are just a retard spouting bullshit. he was a moderate.
 
The legality of guns in USA doesn't invite gun violence in the same way dressing like a whore invites being raped. Regardless of whether or not guns are legal in the US they're not going away. The only thing keeping fully automatic weapons out of the hands of American civilians is the legal status of semi automatic weapons. If you outlaw firearms in America there's nothing left to stop us from beginning to acquire and keep fully automatic weapons. Might as well at that point because we're not giving our guns up.
almost all major shootings are done with illegally imported guns from mexico and yet people think they are so smart they figured out that banning the law abiding citizens from having guns will stop the criminals from doing shootings, jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lefty Rankin
Nobody deserves anything by our judgement, but we should be reasonable here. It is an equivocation fallacy to compare someone 'deserving' something here, a woman can lower her chances of being raped by choosing not to make several bad decisions leading up to it. She doesn't deserve to have something happen to her but the way it is used is to mean she should expect that there is the risk. Charlie Kirk knew the risk and chose to do what he believed was right, and have open and honest dialogue even if we disagree. He would 'deserve' it the same way if he had no security checks for example, but even then that isn't how the word is being used. It is to say it is a justified killing, which we can all disagree with the same way a man is not justified in raping a woman.

If you see a crackhead with a knife screaming about wanting to stab someone and you walk up to him and start arguing, you don't deserve to be killed but you do deserve the direct outcomes of your actions.

Deserving something is not a moral claim, nor does it have bearing on whether we are sympathetic, but we can look at statistics and say someone who failed to have the foresight to act rationally is a fool.
I get what you're saying and I'll have this to say:

There is no reason or justification for anything like murder
Human beings have been killing each other for the most mundane reasons ever since the dawn of time, when you think about it it's all so retarded, a nigga will kill you over stepping on his shoes or for example like in Kirk shit muh groypers hate cuckservatives

The thing is that's what happens when you think you're untouchable and above human beings and not self aware trying to push more hate division which makes more of these people that will look for any "justification" to do something to someone
 
I get what you're saying and I'll have this to say:

There is no reason or justification for anything like murder
Human beings have been killing each other for the most mundane reasons ever since the dawn of time, when you think about it it's all so retarded, a nigga will kill you over stepping on his shoes or for example like in Kirk shit muh groypers hate cuckservatives

The thing is that's what happens when you think you're untouchable and above human beings and not self aware trying to push more hate division which makes more of these people that will look for any "justification" to do something to someone
There is almost always a reason for murder, whether we judge it to be a good one isn't really relevant. It is very rare for people to kill strangers for no reason, even then you could argue the reason would be some mental condition but thats not really our discussion. Charlie Kirk was killed because he was Charlie Kirk. That guy wasn't just looking to kill just anyone, he expected that it would bring him glory among his peers, you could perhaps argue that it would be in pursuit of better sexual optionality as he would have status and have shown himself to be capable of killing for his family. But that is semantics, point is there is a reason things are done. This is platonic philosophy so if you disagree we can talk and I can recite the arguments to you but I think its pretty well agreed.

It is definitely retarded, but consider what motivated them to do what they do. The murderer is not motivated by a want to murder but rather a perceived necessity for their ideal world. A rapist however is motivated by a want to rape, and so it is more reasonable to point out that a woman who dresses immodestly and frequents bad areas will be a more likely target. That doesn't excuse either but rather shows us why we can perceive them differently
 
almost all major shootings are done with illegally imported guns from mexico and yet people think they are so smart they figured out that banning the law abiding citizens from having guns will stop the criminals from doing shootings, jfl
Shoot, I'll become a criminal overnight technically if they ban guns. Myself and many others. And once that happens, being branded criminal overnight, it will become easier to be conscionably less law abiding in other arenas.
 
  • +1
Reactions: takethewhitepill
i dont really think no one deserves anything since our actions doesnt follow a moral code
 
Everyone that voted for im white is indian from mumbai eating chiken masala
 
I dont think anyone deserves to get shot for speaking their mind.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aladin
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8353.jpeg
    IMG_8353.jpeg
    1.1 MB · Views: 0

Similar threads

SchizoParanoid_
Replies
3
Views
134
takethewhitepill
takethewhitepill
_MVP_
Replies
0
Views
79
_MVP_
_MVP_
Jiaxi
Replies
12
Views
377
jackmaxxd
jackmaxxd
Nodesbitch
Replies
4
Views
33
larpcel
L
Jason Voorhees
Replies
32
Views
265
jeoyw9192
J

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top