To Women Being trad/ based/ etc. are just hidden ways to make beta men have a chance. It's like being a gymcel for a worldview. Safe/easy/habitual.

[GoodOutlook]

Gymcelling is nothing to women. They don't monitor safe/easy/habitual things men can control like a gym/ muscles. I see this.

But that's what being christian/ gymcel/ etc. is.

Secondary boosters to helping mens chances.

It's not edgy and elitist like satanism. It's basic and cowardly to live normieishly/ sneaky gradual safe gains for power/ etc.

There is no gym for darwinism. You can bench like crazy etc. but a tall chad with quick/fast reflexes is what women want.
Choosing to have fights with selective engagements with blackpill awareness of your own insecurities and playing defense is not what chad does.

What do women admire sometimes?
Well, you can be a based Chad who is into being trad/christian sure. But they characterize it by looks.

Being elite with satanism/ atheism/ edginess is what women wanna get away with with Chad. Everything sociopathic and high willpower and not sneaky/safe/ gaslighty is what they want.

 

[GoodOutlook]

Being trad is subhuman cope to women.

 

[Chadeep]

I think your argument oversimplifies attraction and reduces it to a narrow set of traits, ignoring the diversity of what women find appealing. While confidence and physical traits like height or fitness might matter to some, attraction is deeply individual and shaped by factors like personality, shared values, and emotional connection.

Not every woman is drawn to "edgy" or dominant qualities—many value kindness, emotional intelligence, and stability. Traits like discipline, self-improvement, and dedication (e.g., through fitness or personal growth) can be equally attractive because they show resilience and commitment.

Assuming all women are attracted to the same qualities oversimplifies relationships. People are more complex, and attraction varies widely based on personal preferences and context.

 

[GoodOutlook]

I think your argument oversimplifies attraction and reduces it to a narrow set of traits, ignoring the diversity of what women find appealing. While confidence and physical traits like height or fitness might matter to some, attraction is deeply individual and shaped by factors like personality, shared values, and emotional connection.

Not every woman is drawn to "edgy" or dominant qualities—many value kindness, emotional intelligence, and stability. Traits like discipline, self-improvement, and dedication (e.g., through fitness or personal growth) can be equally attractive because they show resilience and commitment.

Assuming all women are attracted to the same qualities oversimplifies relationships. People are more complex, and attraction varies widely based on personal preferences and context.

chatgpt?

I'm not really arguing it's kinda oversimplified. But I'm talking about the predominant nu-girl spoiled western girl archetype. I know different archetypes of women have different criteria. Try to get my point.

Saying women are "all different" gives grass to snakes.

 

[GoodOutlook]

I think your argument oversimplifies attraction and reduces it to a narrow set of traits, ignoring the diversity of what women find appealing. While confidence and physical traits like height or fitness might matter to some, attraction is deeply individual and shaped by factors like personality, shared values, and emotional connection.

Not every woman is drawn to "edgy" or dominant qualities—many value kindness, emotional intelligence, and stability. Traits like discipline, self-improvement, and dedication (e.g., through fitness or personal growth) can be equally attractive because they show resilience and commitment.

Assuming all women are attracted to the same qualities oversimplifies relationships. People are more complex, and attraction varies widely based on personal preferences and context.

Seems western women love men who can do elitist degeneracy very slickly. Heaven can wait mindset.

 

[GoodOutlook]

When people say women are more "social creatures" it just comes off like we're putting our failure to interact with them on the social context rather htan the fact they are more hypergamic and insistent if the guy is actually attractive.

Women are probably more autistic than men. because they stayed inside. or maybe that means they're more social bc they had tobe less practical. idk but if you ever see a woman try to rizz a guy it doesn't work as often. women are used to male libido filling in the gap for them. it's easy mode. so they'r enot as social competent maybe?

Santa claus is more socially dynamic than ms. claus lol.

We want to evade negative darwinistic bottomline contexts of biology.

Many things are fueled by delusion of "self improvement". And, a lot of the time people are just angry and backpocket the notion that we're not meant to breed. we just want to put to teh forebrain of our minds that we have a chance by constnatly blaming the world as neanderthals who have yet to see our greatness.

Women know how to blame things on different factors/ excuses.

 

[GoodOutlook]

if oyu let a woman lead a convo there will be endless mall talk.

 

[GoodOutlook]

Religion is a thing that attacks the primaries with secondaries such as security/ looks that have certain worth etc. finding the "one" is what men fear that women want.

 

[Aypo129]

Dnr
Kill all women soon

 

[GoodOutlook]

Dnr
Kill all women soon

do you think if we had replicants from blade runner men would drop simping and start beating/ attacking.

 

[Aypo129]

do you think if we had replicants from blade runner men would drop simping and start beating/ attacking.

Yes+ artificial wombs

 

[GoodOutlook]

Yes+ artificial wombs

Do we need that if we can re-enslave women tho.

 

[GoodOutlook]

Gymcelling is nothing to women. They don't monitor safe/easy/habitual things men can control like a gym/ muscles. I see this.

But that's what being christian/ gymcel/ etc. is.

Secondary boosters to helping mens chances.

It's not edgy and elitist like satanism. It's basic and cowardly to live normieishly/ sneaky gradual safe gains for power/ etc.

There is no gym for darwinism. You can bench like crazy etc. but a tall chad with quick/fast reflexes is what women want.
Choosing to have fights with selective engagements with blackpill awareness of your own insecurities and playing defense is not what chad does.

What do women admire sometimes?
Well, you can be a based Chad who is into being trad/christian sure. But they characterize it by looks.

Being elite with satanism/ atheism/ edginess is what women wanna get away with with Chad. Everything sociopathic and high willpower and not sneaky/safe/ gaslighty is what they want.

its conditioning the environment as a grift for people to gain value/ insit on value that is changeable

such as muscles such as morality such as virtue and gaslight carousel people into a dominant place