True source of natural selection; Tails is wrong in his new vid

irrumator praetor

irrumator praetor

Lifting so I can crack nigger and jew skulls
Joined
Mar 24, 2020
Posts
4,621
Reputation
5,484
He acts like female attraction is a stable thing (Tom Brady). If you really wanna play the eugenics game, we would kill everyone sub8. You can't argue against monogamy, and hypergamy is only possible (in unfortunate financial times, and when women have higher egos) because of non-commitment. They do end up committing but usually with their looksmatch, which doesn't change results.

Monogamy, or rather FAITHFULNESS and chastity/commitment rules were only introduced to make society possible (some hypergamy would happen in upper classes while monogamy was primarily for the masses. Some homeless males would probably go without a mate). Without that, things atomize into clans or more tribal arrangements. Yes, hypergamy and not committing is more profitable and yes the west took that profitable path and yes the west is technologically superior, not thanks to that, but other things primarily. He's not wrong on the impulse and nature part though. But this gives too much feminist energy.

He's acting like white supermacy is purely based on feminism JFL holy shit. You know I can't let that one slide. Hes also acting as if female mate selection is the sole thing behind evolution. What is actually the true driver of evolution are 1) mass death events, catastrophies etc 2) success selection (basically things that filter success. You have more kids when you're successful, and to be successful, you need certain traits ie. you undergo TRUE natural selection). I find it hilarious how they ignore success or social class and just focus on female mate selection. Sooo eugenic bro. Like obviously yes but thats like saying brushing your teeth is natural selection. Like yes, women and men want someone on their level or greater (but often they don't get this) to settle with. Woooow! If we just relied on that for evolution then we would still be in the stone ages. Real evolution is social class/capital success. It's literally primarily determined by ECONOMICS. His problem is that hes too centred on female mate selection, being himself an incel, failing to see the greater picture. And no, currently hypergamy is not good, because it destabilizes society. I think he might be addicted to feeling sorry for himself though, like too brutalist hence he likes feeling that inner sadness when he says these things. But hes being unrealistic.

 
  • +1
Reactions: mrdouchebag, Sub->CL, Divineincel and 4 others
He acts like female attraction is a stable thing (Tom Brady). If you really wanna play the eugenics game, we would kill everyone sub8. You can't argue against monogamy, and hypergamy is only possible (in unfortunate financial times, and when women have higher egos) because of non-commitment. They do end up committing but usually with their looksmatch, which doesn't change results.

Monogamy, or rather FAITHFULNESS and chastity/commitment rules were only introduced to make society possible (some hypergamy would happen in upper classes while monogamy was primarily for the masses. Some homeless males would probably go without a mate). Without that, things atomize into clans or more tribal arrangements. Yes, hypergamy and not committing is more profitable and yes the west took that profitable path and yes the west is technologically superior, not thanks to that, but other things primarily. He's not wrong on the impulse and nature part though. But this gives too much feminist energy.

He's acting like white supermacy is purely based on feminism JFL holy shit. You know I can't let that one slide. Hes also acting as if female mate selection is the sole thing behind evolution. What is actually the true driver of evolution are 1) mass death events, catastrophies etc 2) success selection (basically things that filter success. You have more kids when you're successful, and to be successful, you need certain traits ie. you undergo TRUE natural selection). I find it hilarious how they ignore success or social class and just focus on female mate selection. Sooo eugenic bro. Like obviously yes but thats like saying brushing your teeth is natural selection. Like yes, women and men want someone on their level or greater (but often they don't get this) to settle with. Woooow! If we just relied on that for evolution then we would still be in the stone ages. Real evolution is social class/capital success. It's literally primarily determined by ECONOMICS. His problem is that hes too centred on female mate selection, being himself an incel, failing to see the greater picture. And no, currently hypergamy is not good, because it destabilizes society. I think he might be addicted to feeling sorry for himself though, like too brutalist hence he likes feeling that inner sadness when he says these things. But hes being unrealistic.


Tails is almost a leftists cuck. He argues thay a society of vegans is morally above all other because they have empathy. He forgets that this society would be unable to kick out ethnics due to that empathy
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: mrdouchebag, Sub->CL, Divineincel and 2 others
Tails is almost a leftists cuck. He argues thay a society of vegans is morally above all other because they have empathy. He forgets that this society would be unable to kick out ethnics due to that empathy
leave it to the ethnic to define white supremacy as leftist vegan feminist cucking lol. Also the utmost holiness of white women. I wonder why... is the next video gonna be "every 5+/10 that's blonde is automatic true eve"? He worships sweden a bit too much.... Could he be hitlers greatest solider?
 
  • +1
Reactions: mrdouchebag, Divineincel, ICXCLuvr and 1 other person
Also the utmost holiness of white women. I wonder why... is the next video gonna be "every 5+/10 that's blonde is automatic true eve"? He worships sweden a bit too much.... Could he be hitlers greatest solider?
Jfl I dont think even far right forums worship blonde females as much as him.
 
  • +1
Reactions: mrdouchebag, Divineincel, ICXCLuvr and 1 other person
A lion does not concern himself with the opinion of sheep
 
  • +1
Reactions: mrdouchebag
That's his argument
lmfao yep. Technological advancement primarily driven by war doesn't have its mark on human evolution. It's chad who bullies him or stacy that didn't let him fuck. Or deranged radical feminist women.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Divineincel, ICXCLuvr and trvechud
lmfao yep. Technological advancement primarily driven by war doesn't have its mark on human evolution. It's chad who bullies him or stacy that didn't let him fuck. Or deranged radical feminist women.
Whats funny is the ancestors of nordics (yamnayya) were the opposite of his ideal society. They were violent, patriarchal, religious, and semi individualistic
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: mrdouchebag, irrumator praetor, ICXCLuvr and 1 other person
He acts like female attraction is a stable thing (Tom Brady). If you really wanna play the eugenics game, we would kill everyone sub8. You can't argue against monogamy, and hypergamy is only possible (in unfortunate financial times, and when women have higher egos) because of non-commitment. They do end up committing but usually with their looksmatch, which doesn't change results.

Monogamy, or rather FAITHFULNESS and chastity/commitment rules were only introduced to make society possible (some hypergamy would happen in upper classes while monogamy was primarily for the masses. Some homeless males would probably go without a mate). Without that, things atomize into clans or more tribal arrangements. Yes, hypergamy and not committing is more profitable and yes the west took that profitable path and yes the west is technologically superior, not thanks to that, but other things primarily. He's not wrong on the impulse and nature part though. But this gives too much feminist energy.

He's acting like white supermacy is purely based on feminism JFL holy shit. You know I can't let that one slide. Hes also acting as if female mate selection is the sole thing behind evolution. What is actually the true driver of evolution are 1) mass death events, catastrophies etc 2) success selection (basically things that filter success. You have more kids when you're successful, and to be successful, you need certain traits ie. you undergo TRUE natural selection). I find it hilarious how they ignore success or social class and just focus on female mate selection. Sooo eugenic bro. Like obviously yes but thats like saying brushing your teeth is natural selection. Like yes, women and men want someone on their level or greater (but often they don't get this) to settle with. Woooow! If we just relied on that for evolution then we would still be in the stone ages. Real evolution is social class/capital success. It's literally primarily determined by ECONOMICS. His problem is that hes too centred on female mate selection, being himself an incel, failing to see the greater picture. And no, currently hypergamy is not good, because it destabilizes society. I think he might be addicted to feeling sorry for himself though, like too brutalist hence he likes feeling that inner sadness when he says these things. But hes being unrealistic.


Tails is indian 100%. Promoting veganism, being obsessed with white women (white women are angels saaar). I reckon he even said when I moved to a suburb when only white liberal people live he understood everything:lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: mrdouchebag, irrumator praetor and trvechud
What’s his obsession with Swedish women as if they are just a model demographic :forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: mrdouchebag, irrumator praetor and trvechud
Tails is indian 100%. Promoting veganism, being obsessed with white women (white women are angels saaar). I reckon he even said when I moved to a suburb when only white liberal people live he understood everything:lul:
Jfl now that I realize his worldview sounds similar to the dravidian religion before the yamnayya, feminine and non violent
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: mrdouchebag, irrumator praetor, Divineincel and 1 other person
Jfl now that I realize his worldview sounds similar to the dravidian religion before the yamnayya, feminine and non violent
It is already obvious he is retarded dravidian who lives in Germany
 
  • +1
Reactions: mrdouchebag, irrumator praetor and ICXCLuvr
Whats funny is the ancestors of nordics (yamnayya) were the opposite of his ideal society. They were violent, patriarchal, religious, and semi individualistic
yup and they all agreed to Christianity and chastity. They had chastity laws way more severe than christian before Christianity. Does he think the entire human prehistory is a massive miami club experience? Never has it actually worked in human history how he described it. It was always a mixture or a blend of conditions. Jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: trvechud and mrdouchebag
Chad might fuck a lot of women but if he ain't impregnating them he ain't passing on his genes. There is not much natural selection into this.
Most women reproduce with some unfortunate average looking joe that they marry. The betabuxxers still reproduce.

Also, hypergamy is true, but it generally only applies to casual sex where there is not much investment, effort and commitment required. For longterm relationships and marriage, generally there is not a significant discrepancy in desirability between the man and the woman. If anything it's more likely for the dude to be the less attractive one in the relationship, while the opposite is rarer. Ultimately most men and women go for the best they can, there is no charity. The ratio is very close to 1:1, not 5:1 or something, neither men nor women have much leeway when it comes to actual longterm options.

Chad doesn't want to pay child support to some Becky he fucked and his bastard, so he wraps it up or pushes for abortion, unless he is very rich. Most Chads are young and broke tho. Men generally only really invest in the most desirable women they can get and the offsprings of those women, not their bastards. It's evident throughout history.

That said, this might change soon. Women are the greatest beneficiaries of most welfare, financial support and other forms of assistance, most of the taxes are directed towards the women, not to men. It's not impossible that with the decline in birth rates, nutjob leftists might increase taxation and give women even more money. Once single mothers gain a good source of free income from the taxpayer's money and various other benefits, more might opt for single motherhood and getting impregnated by Chad. Only then will the betabuxxers stop reproducing, which will ultimately reduce productivity and society will crumble. The influx of tons of retarded immigrants will only make things worse.
 

Similar threads

imnotagreyceliswear
Replies
13
Views
105
sonic55555
S
I
Replies
26
Views
112
Panchitosbroncs
Panchitosbroncs
Antonlord7
Replies
14
Views
97
Gengar’s Ghost
Gengar’s Ghost
Jason Voorhees
Replies
37
Views
200
lnceIs
lnceIs
M
Replies
33
Views
201
Eltrē
Eltrē

Users who are viewing this thread

  • trvechud
Back
Top