irrumator praetor
Lifting so I can crack nigger and jew skulls
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2020
- Posts
- 4,621
- Reputation
- 5,484
He acts like female attraction is a stable thing (Tom Brady). If you really wanna play the eugenics game, we would kill everyone sub8. You can't argue against monogamy, and hypergamy is only possible (in unfortunate financial times, and when women have higher egos) because of non-commitment. They do end up committing but usually with their looksmatch, which doesn't change results.
Monogamy, or rather FAITHFULNESS and chastity/commitment rules were only introduced to make society possible (some hypergamy would happen in upper classes while monogamy was primarily for the masses. Some homeless males would probably go without a mate). Without that, things atomize into clans or more tribal arrangements. Yes, hypergamy and not committing is more profitable and yes the west took that profitable path and yes the west is technologically superior, not thanks to that, but other things primarily. He's not wrong on the impulse and nature part though. But this gives too much feminist energy.
He's acting like white supermacy is purely based on feminism JFL holy shit. You know I can't let that one slide. Hes also acting as if female mate selection is the sole thing behind evolution. What is actually the true driver of evolution are 1) mass death events, catastrophies etc 2) success selection (basically things that filter success. You have more kids when you're successful, and to be successful, you need certain traits ie. you undergo TRUE natural selection). I find it hilarious how they ignore success or social class and just focus on female mate selection. Sooo eugenic bro. Like obviously yes but thats like saying brushing your teeth is natural selection. Like yes, women and men want someone on their level or greater (but often they don't get this) to settle with. Woooow! If we just relied on that for evolution then we would still be in the stone ages. Real evolution is social class/capital success. It's literally primarily determined by ECONOMICS. His problem is that hes too centred on female mate selection, being himself an incel, failing to see the greater picture. And no, currently hypergamy is not good, because it destabilizes society. I think he might be addicted to feeling sorry for himself though, like too brutalist hence he likes feeling that inner sadness when he says these things. But hes being unrealistic.
Monogamy, or rather FAITHFULNESS and chastity/commitment rules were only introduced to make society possible (some hypergamy would happen in upper classes while monogamy was primarily for the masses. Some homeless males would probably go without a mate). Without that, things atomize into clans or more tribal arrangements. Yes, hypergamy and not committing is more profitable and yes the west took that profitable path and yes the west is technologically superior, not thanks to that, but other things primarily. He's not wrong on the impulse and nature part though. But this gives too much feminist energy.
He's acting like white supermacy is purely based on feminism JFL holy shit. You know I can't let that one slide. Hes also acting as if female mate selection is the sole thing behind evolution. What is actually the true driver of evolution are 1) mass death events, catastrophies etc 2) success selection (basically things that filter success. You have more kids when you're successful, and to be successful, you need certain traits ie. you undergo TRUE natural selection). I find it hilarious how they ignore success or social class and just focus on female mate selection. Sooo eugenic bro. Like obviously yes but thats like saying brushing your teeth is natural selection. Like yes, women and men want someone on their level or greater (but often they don't get this) to settle with. Woooow! If we just relied on that for evolution then we would still be in the stone ages. Real evolution is social class/capital success. It's literally primarily determined by ECONOMICS. His problem is that hes too centred on female mate selection, being himself an incel, failing to see the greater picture. And no, currently hypergamy is not good, because it destabilizes society. I think he might be addicted to feeling sorry for himself though, like too brutalist hence he likes feeling that inner sadness when he says these things. But hes being unrealistic.