True source of natural selection; Tails is wrong in his new vid

[irrumator praetor]

He acts like female attraction is a stable thing (Tom Brady). If you really wanna play the eugenics game, we would kill everyone sub8. You can't argue against monogamy, and hypergamy is only possible (in unfortunate financial times, and when women have higher egos) because of non-commitment. They do end up committing but usually with their looksmatch, which doesn't change results.

Monogamy, or rather FAITHFULNESS and chastity/commitment rules were only introduced to make society possible (some hypergamy would happen in upper classes while monogamy was primarily for the masses. Some homeless males would probably go without a mate). Without that, things atomize into clans or more tribal arrangements. Yes, hypergamy and not committing is more profitable and yes the west took that profitable path and yes the west is technologically superior, not thanks to that, but other things primarily. He's not wrong on the impulse and nature part though. But this gives too much feminist energy.

He's acting like white supermacy is purely based on feminism JFL holy shit. You know I can't let that one slide. Hes also acting as if female mate selection is the sole thing behind evolution. What is actually the true driver of evolution are 1) mass death events, catastrophies etc 2) success selection (basically things that filter success. You have more kids when you're successful, and to be successful, you need certain traits ie. you undergo TRUE natural selection). I find it hilarious how they ignore success or social class and just focus on female mate selection. Sooo eugenic bro. Like obviously yes but thats like saying brushing your teeth is natural selection. Like yes, women and men want someone on their level or greater (but often they don't get this) to settle with. Woooow! If we just relied on that for evolution then we would still be in the stone ages. Real evolution is social class/capital success. It's literally primarily determined by ECONOMICS. His problem is that hes too centred on female mate selection, being himself an incel, failing to see the greater picture. And no, currently hypergamy is not good, because it destabilizes society. I think he might be addicted to feeling sorry for himself though, like too brutalist hence he likes feeling that inner sadness when he says these things. But hes being unrealistic.

 

[trvechud]

He acts like female attraction is a stable thing (Tom Brady). If you really wanna play the eugenics game, we would kill everyone sub8. You can't argue against monogamy, and hypergamy is only possible (in unfortunate financial times, and when women have higher egos) because of non-commitment. They do end up committing but usually with their looksmatch, which doesn't change results.

Monogamy, or rather FAITHFULNESS and chastity/commitment rules were only introduced to make society possible (some hypergamy would happen in upper classes while monogamy was primarily for the masses. Some homeless males would probably go without a mate). Without that, things atomize into clans or more tribal arrangements. Yes, hypergamy and not committing is more profitable and yes the west took that profitable path and yes the west is technologically superior, not thanks to that, but other things primarily. He's not wrong on the impulse and nature part though. But this gives too much feminist energy.

He's acting like white supermacy is purely based on feminism JFL holy shit. You know I can't let that one slide. Hes also acting as if female mate selection is the sole thing behind evolution. What is actually the true driver of evolution are 1) mass death events, catastrophies etc 2) success selection (basically things that filter success. You have more kids when you're successful, and to be successful, you need certain traits ie. you undergo TRUE natural selection). I find it hilarious how they ignore success or social class and just focus on female mate selection. Sooo eugenic bro. Like obviously yes but thats like saying brushing your teeth is natural selection. Like yes, women and men want someone on their level or greater (but often they don't get this) to settle with. Woooow! If we just relied on that for evolution then we would still be in the stone ages. Real evolution is social class/capital success. It's literally primarily determined by ECONOMICS. His problem is that hes too centred on female mate selection, being himself an incel, failing to see the greater picture. And no, currently hypergamy is not good, because it destabilizes society. I think he might be addicted to feeling sorry for himself though, like too brutalist hence he likes feeling that inner sadness when he says these things. But hes being unrealistic.

Tails is almost a leftists cuck. He argues thay a society of vegans is morally above all other because they have empathy. He forgets that this society would be unable to kick out ethnics due to that empathy

 

[irrumator praetor]

Tails is almost a leftists cuck. He argues thay a society of vegans is morally above all other because they have empathy. He forgets that this society would be unable to kick out ethnics due to that empathy

leave it to the ethnic to define white supremacy as leftist vegan feminist cucking lol. Also the utmost holiness of white women. I wonder why... is the next video gonna be "every 5+/10 that's blonde is automatic true eve"? He worships sweden a bit too much.... Could he be hitlers greatest solider?

 

[trvechud]

leave it to the ethnic to define white supremacy as leftist vegan feminist cucking lol

That's his argument

 

[trvechud]

Also the utmost holiness of white women. I wonder why... is the next video gonna be "every 5+/10 that's blonde is automatic true eve"? He worships sweden a bit too much.... Could he be hitlers greatest solider?

Jfl I dont think even far right forums worship blonde females as much as him.

 

[Nectar]

A lion does not concern himself with the opinion of sheep

 

[irrumator praetor]

That's his argument

lmfao yep. Technological advancement primarily driven by war doesn't have its mark on human evolution. It's chad who bullies him or stacy that didn't let him fuck. Or deranged radical feminist women.

 

[trvechud]

lmfao yep. Technological advancement primarily driven by war doesn't have its mark on human evolution. It's chad who bullies him or stacy that didn't let him fuck. Or deranged radical feminist women.

Whats funny is the ancestors of nordics (yamnayya) were the opposite of his ideal society. They were violent, patriarchal, religious, and semi individualistic

 

[Divineincel]

He acts like female attraction is a stable thing (Tom Brady). If you really wanna play the eugenics game, we would kill everyone sub8. You can't argue against monogamy, and hypergamy is only possible (in unfortunate financial times, and when women have higher egos) because of non-commitment. They do end up committing but usually with their looksmatch, which doesn't change results.

Monogamy, or rather FAITHFULNESS and chastity/commitment rules were only introduced to make society possible (some hypergamy would happen in upper classes while monogamy was primarily for the masses. Some homeless males would probably go without a mate). Without that, things atomize into clans or more tribal arrangements. Yes, hypergamy and not committing is more profitable and yes the west took that profitable path and yes the west is technologically superior, not thanks to that, but other things primarily. He's not wrong on the impulse and nature part though. But this gives too much feminist energy.

He's acting like white supermacy is purely based on feminism JFL holy shit. You know I can't let that one slide. Hes also acting as if female mate selection is the sole thing behind evolution. What is actually the true driver of evolution are 1) mass death events, catastrophies etc 2) success selection (basically things that filter success. You have more kids when you're successful, and to be successful, you need certain traits ie. you undergo TRUE natural selection). I find it hilarious how they ignore success or social class and just focus on female mate selection. Sooo eugenic bro. Like obviously yes but thats like saying brushing your teeth is natural selection. Like yes, women and men want someone on their level or greater (but often they don't get this) to settle with. Woooow! If we just relied on that for evolution then we would still be in the stone ages. Real evolution is social class/capital success. It's literally primarily determined by ECONOMICS. His problem is that hes too centred on female mate selection, being himself an incel, failing to see the greater picture. And no, currently hypergamy is not good, because it destabilizes society. I think he might be addicted to feeling sorry for himself though, like too brutalist hence he likes feeling that inner sadness when he says these things. But hes being unrealistic.

Tails is indian 100%. Promoting veganism, being obsessed with white women (white women are angels saaar). I reckon he even said when I moved to a suburb when only white liberal people live he understood everything

 

[ICXCLuvr]

What’s his obsession with Swedish women as if they are just a model demographic

 

[trvechud]

Tails is indian 100%. Promoting veganism, being obsessed with white women (white women are angels saaar). I reckon he even said when I moved to a suburb when only white liberal people live he understood everything

Jfl now that I realize his worldview sounds similar to the dravidian religion before the yamnayya, feminine and non violent

 

[Divineincel]

Jfl now that I realize his worldview sounds similar to the dravidian religion before the yamnayya, feminine and non violent

It is already obvious he is retarded dravidian who lives in Germany

 

[irrumator praetor]

Whats funny is the ancestors of nordics (yamnayya) were the opposite of his ideal society. They were violent, patriarchal, religious, and semi individualistic

yup and they all agreed to Christianity and chastity. They had chastity laws way more severe than christian before Christianity. Does he think the entire human prehistory is a massive miami club experience? Never has it actually worked in human history how he described it. It was always a mixture or a blend of conditions. Jfl

 

[mrdouchebag]

Chad might fuck a lot of women but if he ain't impregnating them he ain't passing on his genes. There is not much natural selection into this.
Most women reproduce with some unfortunate average looking joe that they marry. The betabuxxers still reproduce.

Also, hypergamy is true, but it generally only applies to casual sex where there is not much investment, effort and commitment required. For longterm relationships and marriage, generally there is not a significant discrepancy in desirability between the man and the woman. If anything it's more likely for the dude to be the less attractive one in the relationship, while the opposite is rarer. Ultimately most men and women go for the best they can, there is no charity. The ratio is very close to 1:1, not 5:1 or something, neither men nor women have much leeway when it comes to actual longterm options.

Chad doesn't want to pay child support to some Becky he fucked and his bastard, so he wraps it up or pushes for abortion, unless he is very rich. Most Chads are young and broke tho. Men generally only really invest in the most desirable women they can get and the offsprings of those women, not their bastards. It's evident throughout history.

That said, this might change soon. Women are the greatest beneficiaries of most welfare, financial support and other forms of assistance, most of the taxes are directed towards the women, not to men. It's not impossible that with the decline in birth rates, nutjob leftists might increase taxation and give women even more money. Once single mothers gain a good source of free income from the taxpayer's money and various other benefits, more might opt for single motherhood and getting impregnated by Chad. Only then will the betabuxxers stop reproducing, which will ultimately reduce productivity and society will crumble. The influx of tons of retarded immigrants will only make things worse.

 

[trvechud]

Chad might fuck a lot of women but if he ain't impregnating them he ain't passing on his genes. There is not much natural selection into this.
Most women reproduce with some unfortunate average looking joe that they marry. The betabuxxers still reproduce.

Also, hypergamy is true, but it generally only applies to casual sex where there is not much investment, effort and commitment required. For longterm relationships and marriage, generally there is not a significant discrepancy in desirability between the man and the woman. If anything it's more likely for the dude to be the less attractive one in the relationship, while the opposite is rarer. Ultimately most men and women go for the best they can, there is no charity. The ratio is very close to 1:1, not 5:1 or something, neither men nor women have much leeway when it comes to actual longterm options.

Chad doesn't want to pay child support to some Becky he fucked and his bastard, so he wraps it up or pushes for abortion, unless he is very rich. Most Chads are young and broke tho. Men generally only really invest in the most desirable women they can get and the offsprings of those women, not their bastards. It's evident throughout history.

That said, this might change soon. Women are the greatest beneficiaries of most welfare, financial support and other forms of assistance, most of the taxes are directed towards the women, not to men. It's not impossible that with the decline in birth rates, nutjob leftists might increase taxation and give women even more money. Once single mothers gain a good source of free income from the taxpayer's money and various other benefits, more might opt for single motherhood and getting impregnated by Chad. Only then will the betabuxxers stop reproducing, which will ultimately reduce productivity and society will crumble. The influx of tons of retarded immigrants will only make things worse.

This will all change in due time. More and more gen z have never ahd sex and are perma virgins, soon the incels will be fed up. The ideal way to fix this would be sever chastity laws punishing fornication with public lashing

 

[irrumator praetor]

Chad might fuck a lot of women but if he ain't impregnating them he ain't passing on his genes. There is not much natural selection into this.
Most women reproduce with some unfortunate average looking joe that they marry. The betabuxxers still reproduce.

Also, hypergamy is true, but it generally only applies to casual sex where there is not much investment, effort and commitment required. For longterm relationships and marriage, generally there is not a significant discrepancy in desirability between the man and the woman. If anything it's more likely for the dude to be the less attractive one in the relationship, while the opposite is rarer. Ultimately most men and women go for the best they can, there is no charity. The ratio is very close to 1:1, not 5:1 or something, neither men nor women have much leeway when it comes to actual longterm options.

Chad doesn't want to pay child support to some Becky he fucked and his bastard, so he wraps it up or pushes for abortion, unless he is very rich. Most Chads are young and broke tho. Men generally only really invest in the most desirable women they can get and the offsprings of those women, not their bastards. It's evident throughout history.

That said, this might change soon. Women are the greatest beneficiaries of most welfare, financial support and other forms of assistance, most of the taxes are directed towards the women, not to men. It's not impossible that with the decline in birth rates, nutjob leftists might increase taxation and give women even more money. Once single mothers gain a good source of free income from the taxpayer's money and various other benefits, more might opt for single motherhood and getting impregnated by Chad. Only then will the betabuxxers stop reproducing, which will ultimately reduce productivity and society will crumble. The influx of tons of retarded immigrants will only make things worse.

Yep, commitment or going through with a child nowadays is primarily economic, if the mother wants the dad in their lives or not, and SMV dynamics at the point of the time the woman wants to settle (usually reduced a bit due to being older). Then again, only wealthy men are able to have multiple bastards, so its ECONOMIC. Most oofy doofies cannot. Therein lies the next issue: how many bastards does chad want? How many women want to have no man with their kid (help in rearing etc)? How many different women can chad have how many bastard kids with, or how many does he want if at all?

As for the welfare, how can the current welfare system be expanded, could an expansion be supported? How can taxes be redirected towards this, and does the government want this?

Betabuxxers will never stop reproducing, and they can only get knocked down in their reproduction rates (total % of population) however probably not by much (how much can the government and chads support?) But its primarily an economic + looks thing. So, wouldn't be a very big change. In fact, unless the current structure gets expanded, I'd argue this is already happening, but its miniscule. Those few women are "lucky".

If a major shift like this were to occur, the major tax contributors who are not benefitting would either revolt or there would have to be a system that walks very thin on ice that would make these people enslaved and willing to comply and slave away for everyone other than themselves to benefit, even at the baseline REPRODUCTIVE level. I don't see this happening though. It would be laughable. Unless maybe a few of them got to eat some crumbs. If they make it a lottery or competition XD. God knows if those people would, from there, choose their shitty chances or revolt. Either way, again, we have a losing side that doesn't benefit, same feedback loop. Incentive to revolt. I don't see it working, unless we get UBI and robot work force etc. That might be interesting: but again, interests of others thwarted -> unrest. No way around it unless they kill them all. That could be a realistic outcome

 

[mrdouchebag]

Yep, commitment or going through with a child nowadays is primarily economic, if the mother wants the dad in their lives or not, and SMV dynamics at the point of the time the woman wants to settle (usually reduced a bit due to being older). Then again, only wealthy men are able to have multiple bastards, so its ECONOMIC. Most oofy doofies cannot. Therein lies the next issue: how many bastards does chad want? How many women want to have no man with their kid (help in rearing etc)? How many different women can chad have how many bastard kids with, or how many does he want if at all?

As for the welfare, how can the current welfare system be expanded, could an expansion be supported? How can taxes be redirected towards this, and does the government want this?

Betabuxxers will never stop reproducing, and they can only get knocked down in their reproduction rates (total % of population) however probably not by much (how much can the government and chads support?) But its primarily an economic + looks thing. So, wouldn't be a very big change. In fact, unless the current structure gets expanded, I'd argue this is already happening, but its miniscule. Those few women are "lucky".

It's definitely already happening. The benefits they get just don't outweigh the utility of the average betabuxxer yet, They barely make ends meet. That's why it's not something a lot of women opt for.... for now.

 

[lnceIs]

Tails is indian 100%. Promoting veganism, being obsessed with white women (white women are angels saaar). I reckon he even said when I moved to a suburb when only white liberal people live he understood everything

I've heard he is a middle aged gook..

 

[irrumator praetor]

If a major shift like this were to occur, the major tax contributors who are not benefitting would either revolt or there would have to be a system that walks very thin on ice that would make these people enslaved and willing to comply and slave away for everyone other than themselves to benefit, even at the baseline REPRODUCTIVE level. I don't see this happening though. It would be laughable. Unless maybe a few of them got to eat some crumbs. If they make it a lottery or competition XD. God knows if those people would, from there, choose their shitty chances or revolt. Either way, again, we have a losing side that doesn't benefit, same feedback loop. Incentive to revolt. I don't see it working, unless we get UBI and robot work force etc. That might be interesting: but again, interests of others thwarted -> unrest. No way around it unless they kill them all. That could be a realistic outcome

It's definitely already happening. The benefits they get just don't outweigh the utility of the average betabuxxer yet, They barely make ends meet. That's why it's not something a lot of women opt for.... for now.

Also, how far does the system want to go to fulfill female interests over their own?

 

[lnceIs]

Tails makes a lot of good points, but he can't hide this certain side of him

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

Vegan LOL.

 

[mrdouchebag]

Also, how far does the system want to go to fulfill female interests over their own?

Things can definitely get worse. Up till there is great dysfunction. Afterwards it will swing towards the opposite direction and balance will be restored one way or another.