Truth about Looksmaxxing

[greycel]

World is vain. Younger generation is even more superficial
So it's expected your future partner will prioritise looks. But the issue is, most people see it as the end all, be all.. everything else hardly matters

The truth is, It's a threshold you have to pass, a static bar -- not a competitive driven bar that's always being raised

Looksmaxxing can afford you higher inhib.

Numbers are arbitrary, but:
an LTN can approach 100 single Stacylites and 5 of them will want to date him
If he looksmaxes to MTN, his chances of success increase - go up to 20
A HTN will have 40
A CL will have 70
etc

The 30 Stacylites who rejected CL, aren't all going for Chad, or even another CL. They'd say yes to a HTN, a MTN, a LTN, and even a subLTN out there somewhere in the world (exactly her type). So they would pick them over a conventional CL. Understand that

Even though "objective attraction" attraction relative to society overlaps heavily with subjective attraction.. ultimately what decides relationships is subjective attraction for most people (those that get with a more conventionally attractive person who they might not find comparitively as attractive do so for validation from society - tend to be partner of trophy wife/husband)

 

[ccwb]

World is vain. Younger generation is even more superficial
So it's expected your future partner will prioritise looks. But the issue is, most people see it as the end all, be all.. everything else hardly matters

The truth is, It's a threshold you have to pass, a static bar -- not a competitive driven bar that's always being raised

Looksmaxxing can afford you higher inhib.

Numbers are arbitrary, but:
an LTN can approach 100 single Stacylites and 5 of them will want to date him
If he looksmaxes to MTN, his chances of success increase - go up to 20
A HTN will have 40
A CL will have 70
etc

The 30 Stacylites who rejected CL, aren't all going for Chad, or even another CL. They'd say yes to a HTN, a MTN, a LTN, and even a subLTN out there somewhere in the world would fit to be exactly her type. The chances of course are decreasing every tier

Even though "objective attraction" attraction relative to society overlaps heavily with subjective attraction.. ultimately what decides relationships is subjective attraction for most people (those that get with a more conventionally attractive person who they might not find comparitively as attractive do so for validation from society - tend to be partner of trophy wife/husband)

Cl only 70
Lol

 

[Deppianiel]

Yes, it’s all about being her type.

matching her preferences exactly, and you’ll become more than you actually are in her eyes.

Phenotype is the law.

img for you

 

[greycel]

Bump