Truth about Looksmaxxing

[greycel]

World is vain. Younger generation is even more superficial
So it's expected your future partner will prioritise looks. But the issue is, most people see it as the end all, be all.. everything else hardly matters

The truth is, It's a threshold you have to pass, a static bar -- not a competitive driven bar that's always being raised

Looksmaxxing can afford you higher inhib.

Numbers are arbitrary, but:
an LTN can approach 100 single Stacylites and 5 of them will want to date him
If he looksmaxes to MTN, his chances of success increase - go up to 20
A HTN will have 40
A CL will have 70
etc

The 30 Stacylites who rejected CL, aren't all going for Chad, or even another CL. They'd say yes to a HTN, a MTN, a LTN, and even a subLTN out there somewhere in the world (exactly her type). So they would pick them over a conventional CL. Understand that

Even though "objective attraction" attraction relative to society overlaps heavily with subjective attraction.. ultimately what decides relationships is subjective attraction for most people (those that get with a more conventionally attractive person who they might not find comparitively as attractive do so for validation from society - tend to be partner of trophy wife/husband)

 

[ccwb]

World is vain. Younger generation is even more superficial
So it's expected your future partner will prioritise looks. But the issue is, most people see it as the end all, be all.. everything else hardly matters

The truth is, It's a threshold you have to pass, a static bar -- not a competitive driven bar that's always being raised

Looksmaxxing can afford you higher inhib.

Numbers are arbitrary, but:
an LTN can approach 100 single Stacylites and 5 of them will want to date him
If he looksmaxes to MTN, his chances of success increase - go up to 20
A HTN will have 40
A CL will have 70
etc

The 30 Stacylites who rejected CL, aren't all going for Chad, or even another CL. They'd say yes to a HTN, a MTN, a LTN, and even a subLTN out there somewhere in the world would fit to be exactly her type. The chances of course are decreasing every tier

Even though "objective attraction" attraction relative to society overlaps heavily with subjective attraction.. ultimately what decides relationships is subjective attraction for most people (those that get with a more conventionally attractive person who they might not find comparitively as attractive do so for validation from society - tend to be partner of trophy wife/husband)

Cl only 70
Lol

 

[Deppianiel]

Yes, it’s all about being her type.

matching her preferences exactly, and you’ll become more than you actually are in her eyes.

Phenotype is the law.

img for you

 

[greycel]

Bump

 

[hopecel]

World is vain. Younger generation is even more superficial
So it's expected your future partner will prioritise looks. But the issue is, most people see it as the end all, be all.. everything else hardly matters

The truth is, It's a threshold you have to pass, a static bar -- not a competitive driven bar that's always being raised

Looksmaxxing can afford you higher inhib.

Numbers are arbitrary, but:
an LTN can approach 100 single Stacylites and 5 of them will want to date him
If he looksmaxes to MTN, his chances of success increase - go up to 20
A HTN will have 40
A CL will have 70
etc

The 30 Stacylites who rejected CL, aren't all going for Chad, or even another CL. They'd say yes to a HTN, a MTN, a LTN, and even a subLTN out there somewhere in the world (exactly her type). So they would pick them over a conventional CL. Understand that

Even though "objective attraction" attraction relative to society overlaps heavily with subjective attraction.. ultimately what decides relationships is subjective attraction for most people (those that get with a more conventionally attractive person who they might not find comparitively as attractive do so for validation from society - tend to be partner of trophy wife/husband)

life starts at 3/10 or sub-LTN as long as you're confident

 

[Punjabi Waffen]

gpted

 

[Punjabi Waffen]

too long

 

[JOTAROSON]

Мир тщеславен. Молодое поколение ещё более поверхностно.
Поэтому вполне ожидаемо, что ваш будущий партнер будет отдавать приоритет внешности. Но проблема в том, что большинство людей считают это абсолютным и определяющим фактором... все остальное почти не имеет значения.

Правда в том, что это некий порог, который нужно преодолеть , статичная планка, а не постоянно повышающаяся планка, обусловленная конкуренцией.

Улучшение внешности может обеспечить вам более высокий уровень подавления .

Числа произвольны, но:
Один одинокий пользователь LTN может набрать до 100 подписчиков, и 5 из них захотят с ним встречаться.
Если он воспользуется услугами MTN для улучшения внешности, его шансы на успех возрастут — до 20.
У пациента с гипертонией будет 40
У CL будет 70
и т. д.

Те 30 девушек из Stacylite, которые отказались от CL, не все стремятся к Чаду или даже к другому CL. Они бы согласились на HTN, MTN, LTN и даже subLTN, где-нибудь в мире (именно такой тип, какой она хочет). Поэтому они бы выбрали их вместо обычного CL. Поймите это .

Хотя «объективная привлекательность», то есть привлекательность в глазах общества, во многом пересекается с субъективной привлекательностью , в конечном итоге для большинства людей отношения определяются именно субъективной привлекательностью (те, кто вступает в отношения с более привлекательным человеком, которого они, возможно, не считают столь же привлекательным, делают это ради одобрения общества — как правило, это партнеры «трофейных» жен/мужей).

Honestly, looking at your nickname, I wouldn't listen to you.

 

[Topkra]

Facts
People overestimate hypergamy tbh

 

[Nectar]

Honestly, looking at your nickname, I wouldn't listen to you.

I wish I could read all of it but why the fuck does OP have that name anyways?

 

[JOTAROSON]

Я бы с удовольствием прочитал всё это, но какого чёрта у автора такое имя?

You read my mind

 

[ltnbrownacnecel]

an LTN can approach 100 single Stacylites and 5 of them will want to date him

Not a chance lol it’s 0.

 

[JOTAROSON]

Факты
Честно говоря, люди переоценивают гипергамию.

No bro

 

[Topkra]

Not a chance lol it’s 0.

Being tall is enough lol

 

[Lawton88]

World is vain. Younger generation is even more superficial
So it's expected your future partner will prioritise looks. But the issue is, most people see it as the end all, be all.. everything else hardly matters

The truth is, It's a threshold you have to pass, a static bar -- not a competitive driven bar that's always being raised

Looksmaxxing can afford you higher inhib.

Numbers are arbitrary, but:
an LTN can approach 100 single Stacylites and 5 of them will want to date him
If he looksmaxes to MTN, his chances of success increase - go up to 20
A HTN will have 40
A CL will have 70
etc

The 30 Stacylites who rejected CL, aren't all going for Chad, or even another CL. They'd say yes to a HTN, a MTN, a LTN, and even a subLTN out there somewhere in the world (exactly her type). So they would pick them over a conventional CL. Understand that

Even though "objective attraction" attraction relative to society overlaps heavily with subjective attraction.. ultimately what decides relationships is subjective attraction for most people (those that get with a more conventionally attractive person who they might not find comparitively as attractive do so for validation from society - tend to be partner of trophy wife/husband)

lol. Average looking guys are invisible to 6/10+ females now unless they are simping big time for nothing in return. Cucks not getting any many times while she goes and sleeps with a Chad that wont finance her.

 

[masai jumps enjoyer]

World is vain. Younger generation is even more superficial
So it's expected your future partner will prioritise looks. But the issue is, most people see it as the end all, be all.. everything else hardly matters

The truth is, It's a threshold you have to pass, a static bar -- not a competitive driven bar that's always being raised

Looksmaxxing can afford you higher inhib.

Numbers are arbitrary, but:
an LTN can approach 100 single Stacylites and 5 of them will want to date him
If he looksmaxes to MTN, his chances of success increase - go up to 20
A HTN will have 40
A CL will have 70
etc

The 30 Stacylites who rejected CL, aren't all going for Chad, or even another CL. They'd say yes to a HTN, a MTN, a LTN, and even a subLTN out there somewhere in the world (exactly her type). So they would pick them over a conventional CL. Understand that

Even though "objective attraction" attraction relative to society overlaps heavily with subjective attraction.. ultimately what decides relationships is subjective attraction for most people (those that get with a more conventionally attractive person who they might not find comparitively as attractive do so for validation from society - tend to be partner of trophy wife/husband)

the numbers are arbitrary but the essence of the post is true, high iq

 

[Aloof]

an LTN can approach 100 single Stacylites and 5 of them will want to date him

jflllllll

 

[ltnbrownacnecel]

Being tall is enough lol

For a stacylite u have to be at least Htn and tall.

 

[Topkra]

For a stacylite u have to be at least Htn and tall.

 

[ltnbrownacnecel]

View attachment 4838948

Just use the exception where the guy is a statusmaxed nba player theory.

 

[Topkra]

Just use the exception where the guy is a statusmaxed nba player theory.

Not famous enough to actually have effect imo

 

[greycel]

For a stacylite u have to be at least Htn and tall.

It’s all probabilities. Doesn’t hit 0 between MTN and HTN
Because priority of subjective attraction + other factors that contribute more to weighting

 

[greycel]

Not famous enough to actually have effect imo

Exactly. He leveraged other things he strays furthest from the mean in (height, body, etc) + he was her subjective type facially anyways

 

[Eltrē]

No offense fella, but what was the point of this thread?

Looks like some word salad GPTslop would vomit out if I asked it what looksmaxxing is for with some angsty teen subreddit as its source of information.

 

[greycel]

Bump

 

[Deleted member 299506]

World is vain. Younger generation is even more superficial
So it's expected your future partner will prioritise looks. But the issue is, most people see it as the end all, be all.. everything else hardly matters

The truth is, It's a threshold you have to pass, a static bar -- not a competitive driven bar that's always being raised

Looksmaxxing can afford you higher inhib.

Numbers are arbitrary, but:
an LTN can approach 100 single Stacylites and 5 of them will want to date him
If he looksmaxes to MTN, his chances of success increase - go up to 20
A HTN will have 40
A CL will have 70
etc

The 30 Stacylites who rejected CL, aren't all going for Chad, or even another CL. They'd say yes to a HTN, a MTN, a LTN, and even a subLTN out there somewhere in the world (exactly her type). So they would pick them over a conventional CL. Understand that

Even though "objective attraction" attraction relative to society overlaps heavily with subjective attraction.. ultimately what decides relationships is subjective attraction for most people (those that get with a more conventionally attractive person who they might not find comparitively as attractive do so for validation from society - tend to be partner of trophy wife/husband)

I can see what you mean,but this is kinda stupid

 

[greycel]

I can see what you mean,but this is kinda stupid

How so?

 

[Deleted member 299506]

How so?

You can't get with an attractive woman if you "try hard enough" if you're ugly, that's what media wants you to think,I think you've consumed too many rom coms please stop watching rom coms and re-read your thread because this genuinely makes almost no sense

 

[greycel]

You can't get with an attractive woman if you "try hard enough" if you're ugly, that's what media wants you to think,I think you've consumed too many rom coms please stop watching rom coms and re-read your thread because this genuinely makes almost no sense

You missed the entire point. Subjective trumps everything else
Even though subjective is affected by society's viewpoint

For example, I personally am not attracted to Margot Robbie. But if you averaged 100 guys, they would rate her a 9.
Same applies in reverse. A girl who might be considered high MTB - 6 (average according to the 100 guys), might be Stacy rarity in your eyes - 9+.

All this applies to men too

Step out of black and white thinking. There is no objective attraction. Attraction relative to society is also not what people prioritise
Those that prioritise it the most are looking for a trophy wife/husband

It's all probabilities

 

[Deleted member 299506]

You missed the entire point. Subjective trumps everything else
Even though subjective is affected by society's viewpoint

For example, I personally am not attracted to Margot Robbie. But if you averaged 100 guys, they would rate her a 9.
Same applies in reverse. A girl who might be considered high MTB - 6 (average according to the 100 guys), might be Stacy rarity in your eyes - 9+.

All this applies to men too

Step out of black and white thinking. There is no objective attraction. Attraction relative to society is also not what people prioritise
Those that prioritise it the most are looking for a trophy wife/husband

It's all probabilities

I don't overrate anyone and I don't have a specific preference, subjectiveness is a thing but it's retarded

 

[greycel]

I don't overrate anyone and I don't have a specific preference

If you have no bias, then I find it hard to believe you have any innate attraction to women at all
Nothing to do with over/underrating

 

[SomaliSub5]

sorry but nobody is going to have 70% success rate asking women out

not even Henry Cavill would have a 70% success rate

 

[greycel]

sorry but nobody is going to have 70% success rate asking women out

not even Henry Cavill would have a 70% success rate

Single women who are open to dating*
IRL warm approach

 

[iwannasleeponurlap]

it's all luck and these factors only boost your luck

 

[greycel]

Bump