Twitter explodes against muslims over a bail of rapist in london train

  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
Punjabis average to have around ~30% AASI iirc
Yes, but he’s implying that Punjabis are therefore close to Dravidians which isn’t true. Dravidians have much higher in comparison, and the only Punjabis who share similar percentages are Christian Punjabis and Chamar Punjabis. I already gave an example that a Punjabi Jatt and a Punjabi Chamar will have twice the genetic distance between two drastically different European nations. Dravidians also lack Steppe in general which is what Punjabis will have.
 
Nigga? I was talking about Punjabis.
Punjabi jatts are the most west shifted punjabis and even they are twice as closer to tamil than to persians.
1753976649627
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
Not true. Pakistanis aren’t seen as unhygienic streetshitters, unlike Indians.
Not many Pakistani where I live. They live in Houston, NYC, but an American 99% of the time Americans simply dont care

@Uehdbwidbfngj
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaStacySexual and Uehdbwidbfngj
Why are you bringing other people into it when we were talking Indics and Dravidians? Stick to these two.
Im applying thr logic you did with chamar punjabis and the upper caste. The genetic distance between pasthuns and punjabis is also large in many of these maps
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaStacySexual
Not many Pakistani where I live. They live in Houston, NYC, but an American 99% of the time Americans simply dont care

@Uehdbwidbfngj
American opinions are to be discarded, they can’t even point out countries properly on world maps, lol.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Uehdbwidbfngj
Mujeets are just muzzie pajeets from Uttar Pradesh etc.
you're trying your best not to be a jeet but every SA country is jeet mostly :lul::forcedsmile:
jfl 85-90% of pakistan is north indid so is 90-95% of north india (states near pakistan)
 
A distance of 8! Do you know how much that is? Any distance more than 5 means absolutely no genetic relation at all.
A genetic distance of 0.08 doesn’t mean “no relation” it actually means moderate shared ancestry. These values are relative and context-dependent, never absolute cutoffs @GigaStacySexual
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaStacySexual
Im applying thr logic you did with chamar punjabis and the upper caste. The genetic distance between pasthuns and punjabis is also large in many of these maps
No need to bring non-Indics into this. I was talking about Punjabis and Dravidians. Are you going to bring South East Asians into this because they border South Asia? That said there are Punjabis who score like Iranics do, namely Arains, Kamboh, some Jatts, etc.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Uehdbwidbfngj
you're trying your best not to be a jeet but every SA country is jeet mostly :lul::forcedsmile:
jfl 85-90% of pakistan is north indid so is 90-95% of north india (states near pakistan)
That’s because I’m not a jeet, I’m not Indian. I’m South Asian though but jeet and South Asian isn’t interchangeable.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Uehdbwidbfngj
That’s because I’m not a jeet, I’m not Indian. I’m South Asian though but jeet and South Asian isn’t interchangeable.
so then bangladeshis are also not jeets?
even tho they look jeet-er on an avg?
:forcedsmile:
 
A genetic distance of 0.08 doesn’t mean “no relation” it actually means moderate shared ancestry. These values are relative and context-dependent, never absolute cutoffs @GigaStacySexual
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

That’s not a genetic distance of 0.08. That’s a genetic distance of 8.

People, including you, simply don’t know how to read these numbers. It’s a genetic distance of 8, not 0.08.
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaStacySexual
Oh my gosh why can’t all brown people just kick the fucking bucket atp
 
so then bangladeshis are also not jeets?
even tho they look jeet-er on an avg?
:forcedsmile:
Bengalis are also jeets, but they also have considerable have South East Asian ancestry.
 
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

That’s not a genetic distance of 0.08. That’s a genetic distance of 8.

People, including you, simply don’t know how to read these numbers. It’s a genetic distance of 8, not 0.08.
No. You’re misreading the data. That number is 0.080, not “8” it’s a fraction, not a whole number. Genetic distances like this are usually on a scale from 0 to 1, where lower means closer. A value of 0.080 is actually quite close, especially in global genetic terms. If it were truly a distance of 8, it wouldn’t even appear on this kind of plot that would imply you're comparing entirely different species.
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaStacySexual
No. You’re misreading the data. That number is 0.080, not “8” it’s a fraction, not a whole number. Genetic distances like this are usually on a scale from 0 to 1, where lower means closer. A value of 0.080 is actually quite close, especially in global genetic terms. If it were truly a distance of 8, it wouldn’t even appear on this kind of plot that would imply you're comparing entirely different species.
Both you and @GigaStacySexual have no idea what you’re talking about. That’s a genetic distance of 8, not 0.08. You’re looking at Vahaduo data which isn’t to be taken at face value. You two are seriously embarrassing yourselves by falsely interpreting data to further your own misguided agendas.

@JohnDoe
 
  • +1
Reactions: JohnDoe and GigaStacySexual
I didn’t see it. You should take a DNA test. :feelshah:
Ive thought about ancestory a while back

But it was pretty pricey. I probably will sometime soon
Unless @Jason Voorhees can buy it for me :forcedsmile:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Gengar
Both you and @GigaStacySexual have no idea what you’re talking about. That’s a genetic distance of 8, not 0.08. You’re looking at Vahaduo data which isn’t to be taken at face value. You two are seriously embarrassing yourselves by falsely interpreting data to further your own misguided agendas.

@JohnDoe
No. Vahaduo (and similar tools like Global25) uses scaled Euclidean distances in PCA space and PCA represent how far apart populations are in terms of variation. This is high school math.A "distance of 8" in Vahaduo simply means "8 units" on that scaled PCA plot scale. Put what I said in chatgpt and it will tell you I am correct. You can call it @GigaStacySexual
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaStacySexual
Ive thought about ancestory a while back

But it was pretty pricey. I probably will sometime soon
Unless @Jason Voorhees can buy it for me :forcedsmile:
You two should do them. I suggest AncestryDNA and not 23andme.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Uehdbwidbfngj
So did he ascend ?
I guess pretty much
 
Ive thought about ancestory a while back

But it was pretty pricey. I probably will sometime soon
Unless @Jason Voorhees can buy it for me :forcedsmile:
I will buy next month
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaStacySexual, Gengar and Uehdbwidbfngj
No. Vahaduo (and similar tools like Global25) uses scaled Euclidean distances in PCA space and PCA represent how far apart populations are in terms of variation. This is high school math.A "distance of 8" in Vahaduo simply means "8 units" on that scaled PCA plot scale. Put what I said in chatgpt and it will tell you I am correct. You can call it @GigaStacySexual
Nope, you’re completely wrong, so is the other guy. If Vahaduo says it’s 0.08, it means a genetic distance of 8 and not literally 0.08.

@CFW432 :ROFLMAO: Look at this.
 
Nope, you’re completely wrong, so is the other guy. If Vahaduo says it’s 0.08, it means a genetic distance of 8 and not literally 0.08.

@CFW432 :ROFLMAO: Look at this.
Just ask chatgpt if i am wrong.

1000217019
1000217020
 
@GigaStacySexual I researched all this to an autistic degree in 2021 already.
Clearly you didn’t research it properly. Otherwise you’d not be peddling this BS. :ROFLMAO:
 
You are seriously embarrassing yourself, Jason. I thought you were smarter than this.

If Vahaduo says it’s 0.08, the genetic distance is 8. Your lack of understanding these data is very obvious here.
Not my words

1000217023
 
Clearly you didn’t research it properly. Otherwise you’d not be peddling this BS. :ROFLMAO:
Put what I said in chatgpt, Gemini, Claude or any AI. A.I knows more than both of us so it should be correct
 
Put what I said in chatgpt, Gemini, Claude or any AI. A.I knows more than both of us so it should be correct
Flawed logic. AI only pushes out the input it’s been given. If it’s given wrong information, it will give wrong information. ChatGPT isn’t flawless, it’s still a man-made tool. And that can be erroneous.
 
You realize ChatGPT can be wrong too, right? :feelswhere:

If Vahaduo says it’s 0.08, it’s 8. People don’t even know how to interpret Vahaduo data correctly. :ROFLMAO:

If you did proper research, you’d know I am right here.
Flawed logic. AI only pushes out the input it’s been given. If it’s given wrong information, it will give wrong information. ChatGPT isn’t flawless, it’s still a man-made tool. And that can be erroneous.
Just ask chatgpt or google if Vahaduo and Global25 uses scaled Euclidean distances in PCA space or not. If it does you have your answer
 

Rape is bad enough, but rape by a subhuman is a whole 'nother thing. If she was raped by white Chad she would probably enjoy it, but now that this 'thing' has raped her she will for the rest of her life feel unclean and violated.
 
Just ask chatgpt or google if Vahaduo and Global25 uses scaled Euclidean distances in PCA space or not. If it does you have your answer
I already know the correct answer and it’s not what you two have been spewing. The genetic distance is 8, not 0.08.
 

these fucking stupid reform fags and old farts dont understand they dont rape white girls cuz they hate white people or something its cuz they r the hottest. Fucking low iqcels
 
  • +1
Reactions: JohnDoe

Similar threads

Jason Voorhees
Replies
10
Views
291
chadhamed
chadhamed
SlavojZ
Replies
2
Views
133
hasba1feuj
hasba1feuj
disillusioned
Replies
38
Views
1K
disillusioned
disillusioned
D
Replies
4
Views
507
saggyballsackcel
saggyballsackcel
PolisCommov
Replies
23
Views
2K
Lawton88
L

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top