
Jason Voorhees
𝕯𝖝𝕯 𝖈𝖗𝖊𝖜 𝕵𝖊𝖘𝖙𝖊𝖗
- Joined
- May 15, 2020
- Posts
- 65,329
- Reputation
- 183,985
- OP
- #101
Punjabis average to have around ~30% AASI iircWhy would he get a heart attack?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Punjabis average to have around ~30% AASI iircWhy would he get a heart attack?
He’s just coping.I am tired telling this tbh. @Uehdbwidbfngj gets it tho. He understands we all suffer together
keep believing in your incelslop nigger, the jews warned you about them btw but the gay europeans blamed it on them.
Yes what I said also applied to punjabis.Nigga? I was talking about Punjabis.
Pakistan does definitely have a higher rep tho.Not true. Pakistanis aren’t seen as unhygienic streetshitters, unlike Indians.
Yes, but he’s implying that Punjabis are therefore close to Dravidians which isn’t true. Dravidians have much higher in comparison, and the only Punjabis who share similar percentages are Christian Punjabis and Chamar Punjabis. I already gave an example that a Punjabi Jatt and a Punjabi Chamar will have twice the genetic distance between two drastically different European nations. Dravidians also lack Steppe in general which is what Punjabis will have.Punjabis average to have around ~30% AASI iirc
Why are you bringing other people into it when we were talking Indics and Dravidians? Stick to these two.Yes what I said also applied to punjabis.
Are you Pakistani?Pakistan does definitely have a higher rep tho.
Yes I amAre you Pakistani?
Which city?Yes I am
Punjabi jatts are the most west shifted punjabis and even they are twice as closer to tamil than to persians.Nigga? I was talking about Punjabis.
, mom was born in Lahore, dad was born IslamabadWhich city?
Mujeets are just muzzie pajeets from Uttar Pradesh etc.pajeet vs mujeet civil war![]()
Not many Pakistani where I live. They live in Houston, NYC, but an American 99% of the time Americans simply dont careNot true. Pakistanis aren’t seen as unhygienic streetshitters, unlike Indians.
A distance of 8! Do you know how much that is? Any distance more than 5 means absolutely no genetic relation at all.Punjabi jatts are the most west shifted punjabis and even they are twice as closer to tamil than to persians.
View attachment 3975582
Im applying thr logic you did with chamar punjabis and the upper caste. The genetic distance between pasthuns and punjabis is also large in many of these mapsWhy are you bringing other people into it when we were talking Indics and Dravidians? Stick to these two.
American opinions are to be discarded, they can’t even point out countries properly on world maps, lol.Not many Pakistani where I live. They live in Houston, NYC, but an American 99% of the time Americans simply dont care
@Uehdbwidbfngj
Which city are you fromWhich city?
you're trying your best not to be a jeet but every SA country is jeet mostlyMujeets are just muzzie pajeets from Uttar Pradesh etc.
A genetic distance of 0.08 doesn’t mean “no relation” it actually means moderate shared ancestry. These values are relative and context-dependent, never absolute cutoffs @GigaStacySexualA distance of 8! Do you know how much that is? Any distance more than 5 means absolutely no genetic relation at all.
No need to bring non-Indics into this. I was talking about Punjabis and Dravidians. Are you going to bring South East Asians into this because they border South Asia? That said there are Punjabis who score like Iranics do, namely Arains, Kamboh, some Jatts, etc.Im applying thr logic you did with chamar punjabis and the upper caste. The genetic distance between pasthuns and punjabis is also large in many of these maps
That’s because I’m not a jeet, I’m not Indian. I’m South Asian though but jeet and South Asian isn’t interchangeable.you're trying your best not to be a jeet but every SA country is jeet mostly
jfl 85-90% of pakistan is north indid so is 90-95% of north india (states near pakistan)
so then bangladeshis are also not jeets?That’s because I’m not a jeet, I’m not Indian. I’m South Asian though but jeet and South Asian isn’t interchangeable.
A genetic distance of 0.08 doesn’t mean “no relation” it actually means moderate shared ancestry. These values are relative and context-dependent, never absolute cutoffs @GigaStacySexual
Bengalis are also jeets, but they also have considerable have South East Asian ancestry.so then bangladeshis are also not jeets?
even tho they look jeet-er on an avg?
![]()
No. You’re misreading the data. That number is 0.080, not “8” it’s a fraction, not a whole number. Genetic distances like this are usually on a scale from 0 to 1, where lower means closer. A value of 0.080 is actually quite close, especially in global genetic terms. If it were truly a distance of 8, it wouldn’t even appear on this kind of plot that would imply you're comparing entirely different species.
That’s not a genetic distance of 0.08. That’s a genetic distance of 8.
People, including you, simply don’t know how to read these numbers. It’s a genetic distance of 8, not 0.08.
Near Islamabad, what about you?Which city are you from
I said it alreadyNear Islamabad, what about you?
, mom was born in Lahore, dad was born Islamabad
Both you and @GigaStacySexual have no idea what you’re talking about. That’s a genetic distance of 8, not 0.08. You’re looking at Vahaduo data which isn’t to be taken at face value. You two are seriously embarrassing yourselves by falsely interpreting data to further your own misguided agendas.No. You’re misreading the data. That number is 0.080, not “8” it’s a fraction, not a whole number. Genetic distances like this are usually on a scale from 0 to 1, where lower means closer. A value of 0.080 is actually quite close, especially in global genetic terms. If it were truly a distance of 8, it wouldn’t even appear on this kind of plot that would imply you're comparing entirely different species.
I didn’t see it. You should take a DNA test.I said it already
I was born in America
website?Punjabi jatts are the most west shifted punjabis and even they are twice as closer to tamil than to persians.
View attachment 3975582
Ive thought about ancestory a while backI didn’t see it. You should take a DNA test.![]()
No. Vahaduo (and similar tools like Global25) uses scaled Euclidean distances in PCA space and PCA represent how far apart populations are in terms of variation. This is high school math.A "distance of 8" in Vahaduo simply means "8 units" on that scaled PCA plot scale. Put what I said in chatgpt and it will tell you I am correct. You can call it @GigaStacySexualBoth you and @GigaStacySexual have no idea what you’re talking about. That’s a genetic distance of 8, not 0.08. You’re looking at Vahaduo data which isn’t to be taken at face value. You two are seriously embarrassing yourselves by falsely interpreting data to further your own misguided agendas.
@JohnDoe
You two should do them. I suggest AncestryDNA and not 23andme.Ive thought about ancestory a while back
But it was pretty pricey. I probably will sometime soon
Unless @Jason Voorhees can buy it for me![]()
I will buy next monthIve thought about ancestory a while back
But it was pretty pricey. I probably will sometime soon
Unless @Jason Voorhees can buy it for me![]()
Nope, you’re completely wrong, so is the other guy. If Vahaduo says it’s 0.08, it means a genetic distance of 8 and not literally 0.08.No. Vahaduo (and similar tools like Global25) uses scaled Euclidean distances in PCA space and PCA represent how far apart populations are in terms of variation. This is high school math.A "distance of 8" in Vahaduo simply means "8 units" on that scaled PCA plot scale. Put what I said in chatgpt and it will tell you I am correct. You can call it @GigaStacySexual
Just ask chatgpt if i am wrong.Nope, you’re completely wrong, so is the other guy. If Vahaduo says it’s 0.08, it means a genetic distance of 8 and not literally 0.08.
@CFW432Look at this.
@GigaStacySexual I researched all this to an autistic degree in 2021 already.
You are seriously embarrassing yourself, Jason. I thought you were smarter than this.
Clearly you didn’t research it properly. Otherwise you’d not be peddling this BS.@GigaStacySexual I researched all this to an autistic degree in 2021 already.
Not my wordsYou are seriously embarrassing yourself, Jason. I thought you were smarter than this.
If Vahaduo says it’s 0.08, the genetic distance is 8. Your lack of understanding these data is very obvious here.
Put what I said in chatgpt, Gemini, Claude or any AI. A.I knows more than both of us so it should be correctClearly you didn’t research it properly. Otherwise you’d not be peddling this BS.![]()
You realize ChatGPT can be wrong too, right?
Flawed logic. AI only pushes out the input it’s been given. If it’s given wrong information, it will give wrong information. ChatGPT isn’t flawless, it’s still a man-made tool. And that can be erroneous.Put what I said in chatgpt, Gemini, Claude or any AI. A.I knows more than both of us so it should be correct
You realize ChatGPT can be wrong too, right?
If Vahaduo says it’s 0.08, it’s 8. People don’t even know how to interpret Vahaduo data correctly.
If you did proper research, you’d know I am right here.
Just ask chatgpt or google if Vahaduo and Global25 uses scaled Euclidean distances in PCA space or not. If it does you have your answerFlawed logic. AI only pushes out the input it’s been given. If it’s given wrong information, it will give wrong information. ChatGPT isn’t flawless, it’s still a man-made tool. And that can be erroneous.
I already know the correct answer and it’s not what you two have been spewing. The genetic distance is 8, not 0.08.Just ask chatgpt or google if Vahaduo and Global25 uses scaled Euclidean distances in PCA space or not. If it does you have your answer