Twitter explodes against muslims over a bail of rapist in london train

Both you and @GigaStacySexual have no idea what you’re talking about. That’s a genetic distance of 8, not 0.08. You’re looking at Vahaduo data which isn’t to be taken at face value. You two are seriously embarrassing yourselves by falsely interpreting data to further your own misguided agendas.
I know that Vahaduo does not take genetical drift between isolated populations into account like FST (Fixation index) does. But it is still decent tool for analysing genetical difference.
And my main argument isn't that punjabis and tamils are sem2sem. My argument was that they are not two completely different races that some pakis and north Indians think that they are.
I thought Indians and Pakistanis were supposed to completely different races with nothing in common? @JohnDoe @Swarthy Knight @Lightskin Ethnic argued about this for 2 pages in my thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
I already know the correct answer and it’s not what you two have been spewing. The genetic distance is 8, not 0.08.
If I am wrong give me some kind of proof that I am wrong or interpreting it incorrectly
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaStacySexual
You realize ChatGPT can be wrong too, right? :feelswhere:

If Vahaduo says it’s 0.08, it’s 8. People don’t even know how to interpret Vahaduo data correctly. :ROFLMAO:

If you did proper research, you’d know I am right here.
1000012141

chatGPT is rtarded sometimes, I had to look up what you are talking about and took the liberty to ask it
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar, Jason Voorhees and GigaStacySexual
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: turneywest, uglywigger, RXnd and 1 other person
@Gengar het ziet er niet goed uit voor de pakistanen.
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Gengar
I know that Vahaduo does not take genetical drift between isolated populations into account like FST (Fixation index) does. But it is still decent tool for analysing genetical difference.
And my main argument isn't that punjabis and tamils are sem2sem. My argument was that they are not two completely different races that some pakis and north Indians think that they are.
The problem with Vahaduo is you have guys who will think 0.08 means a genetic distance of 0.08. That’s not the case. It’s a distance of 8. Obviously, there’s an ancient relation to other South Asians, but to what extent and how exactly, we still don’t know. AASI is still a ghost population after all, and there is a current theory of there being different types of AASI. However, if we are going to say that South Asians are the same due to ancient components, then why stop there? Why not say we’re all Africans? I’m not denying any links with Dravidians, my (male) ancestors mixed with the locals so those who share my Y-DNA obviously I have some link to. But to say Punjabis are genetically close to other South Asians - or Dravidians to be precise - isn’t wrong. I don’t dislike Dravidians of course but I do dislike wrong information being pushed out to fit whatever narrative someone has.
If I am wrong give me some kind of proof that I am wrong or interpreting it incorrectly
Sure, I will give you proof when I am on PC. I will show you that Vahaduo interprets it differently (in the wrong fashion).
 
I know that Vahaduo does not take genetical drift between isolated populations into account like FST (Fixation index) does. But it is still decent tool for analysing genetical difference.
And my main argument isn't that punjabis and tamils are sem2sem. My argument was that they are not two completely different races that some pakis and north Indians think that they are.
Ah yes now I remember you do something like Fst × 1000 scales in older population genetics studies . I think that is what @Gengar is what is referring to
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaStacySexual
Sure, I will give you proof when I am on PC. I will show you that Vahaduo interprets it differently (in the wrong fashion).
If you give definitive proof i will concede
 
@Gengar het ziet er niet goed uit voor de pakistanen.


1) Hij vertegenwoordigt ons niet.

2) Zijn familie steunt hem niet, wij ook niet.

3) Acties van een individu moet alleen tegen diegene gebruikt worden.

Niemand keurt dit goed, zowel cultureel als islamitisch. Zijn familie’s reputatie is nu wel verpest in de Pakistaanse gemeenschap, ondanks dat hij degene is die iets had gedaan. Zijn onschuldige broers bijvoorbeeld zullen alsnog een slechte naam krijgen vanwege zijn acties (in onze gemeenschap).
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Hernan
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
1) Hij vertegenwoordigt ons niet.

2) Zijn familie steunt hem niet, wij ook niet.

3) Acties van een individu moet alleen tegen diegene gebruikt worden.

Niemand keurt dit goed, zowel cultureel als islamitisch. Zijn familie’s reputatie is nu wel verpest in de Pakistaanse gemeenschap, ondanks dat hij degene is die iets had gedaan. Zijn onschuldige broers bijvoorbeeld zullen alsnog een slechte naam krijgen vanwege zijn acties (in onze gemeenschap).
tja maar het is altijd wel 1 per pakistaanse familie precies. net zoals bij de arabieren en indiërs. 1/4 gezinsleden zijn criminelen ahh.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gengar
Ah yes now I remember you do something like Fst × 1000 scales in older population genetics studies . I think that is what @Gengar is what is referring to
No, ancient or modern it doesn’t matter, it applies to both!
 
tja maar het is altijd wel 1 per pakistaanse familie precies. net zoals bij de arabieren en indiërs. 1/4 gezinsleden zijn criminelen ahh.
Nou dan kunnen m dat over iedereen zeggen nietwaar? Er zijn bijvoorbeeld veel pedofielen in Nederland, als men nu zegt dat 1 op de 3 Nederlandse mannen een pedofiel is, is dat toch niet waar?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hernan
Nou dan kunnen m dat over iedereen zeggen nietwaar? Er zijn bijvoorbeeld veel pedofielen in Nederland, als men nu zegt dat 1 op de 3 Nederlandse mannen een pedofiel is, is dat toch niet waar?
ja maar wees eerlijk gengy ily maar wees eerlijk, bruinen in europa zijn kk disproportioneel crimineel.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gengar
No, ancient or modern it doesn’t matter, it applies to both!
I dont think it is from what I remember. Vahaduo, PCA, or ADMIXTOOLS all use Euclidean distance but prove me wrong
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaStacySexual
bruinen in europa zijn kk disproportioneel crimineel.
browns in europe commit disproportionate crime? fuck I know dutch and did not even know it
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Hernan
The rich class has its own perversions
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaStacySexual, Gengar and Panzram
ja maar wees eerlijk gengy ily maar wees eerlijk, bruinen in europa zijn kk disproportioneel crimineel.
Ja, maar wij Pakistanen meestal niet. Althans in Europa zelf (niet Engeland meegeteld). Pakistanen krijgen altijd van thuis mee dat ze goed moeten studeren en dergelijke, en we zijn ook gemiddeld meer religieus dus willen wij geen dingen doen die haram zijn. In Engeland zijn ze meestal verwijderd van de Pakistaanse cultuur zelf en meer verwesterd, ze zien zichzelf immers ook als Brits in plaats van Pakistaans. Hoe ver iemand verwijderd is van het geloof / cultuur, des te meer hij of zij geneigd is dingen te doen die niet horen. Hij mag wel een baard hebben maar dat betrekt niet dat hij werkelijk religieus is. Bij ons zeggen ze ook dat een baard niks meer betekent tegenwoordig.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hernan and 2414763h
I dont think it is from what I remember. Vahaduo, PCA, or ADMIXTOOLS all use Euclidean distance but prove me wrong
ADMIXTOOLS is for qpAdm, Vahaduo and PCA is for G25. I’ll show you proof when I get on PC, around 6 hours from now. :Comfy:
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2414763h and Jason Voorhees
You are also part of the lesser races since you are Balkan. Read Victorian newspaper from 1800s. @imontheloose
I shall name your city after Victoria upon the second great conquest.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
ADMIXTOOLS is for qpAdm, Vahaduo and PCA is for G25. I’ll show you proof when I get on PC, around 6 hours from now. :Comfy:
Reply to my other thread I have retired from this phenotype autism anyway.
 
Nope, you’re completely wrong, so is the other guy. If Vahaduo says it’s 0.08, it means a genetic distance of 8 and not literally 0.08.

@CFW432 :ROFLMAO: Look at this.


i dont really know how to use Vahaduo like that, but i dont really need to since PCA plots already do what you guys are trying to figure out:

if punjabi jatts are closer to to persians or tamils.

After fucking meticulously looking through the interactive PCA plot map on Vahaduo for almost a half an hour, i managed to find populations that are the best to represent the 3 populations of your average Tamil, Punjabi Jatts, and Persians, with proof:




First Tamils:

Screenshot 214


Since there was no OBC Tamil castes listed on the PCA plot besides dalits and tribals, i had to use the next best caste to best represent the genetics of your average Tamil who would be either a Nadar or Vellalar. This was the Telugu Velama.


For some reason i literally couldnt find many "punjabi jatt" samples besides this one, so thats what we are going with:

Screenshot 209



And finally for iranian samples i found really only 3 samples, iranian fars, iranian zoroastrian, and iranian jew.


Screenshot 217






Here are the results:



Screenshot 219













LMAO as you can see, the genetic distance that your average punjabi jatt is to the average iranian from fars or tehran is almost 3 TIMES shorter, than the genetic distance of your average tamil to your average punjabi jatt.


@Gengar , voorhees is an australoid coper, why do you even entertain his bullshit? :lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Gengar
The problem with Vahaduo is you have guys who will think 0.08 means a genetic distance of 0.08
The difference between two populations is represented between 0 to 1. 0 being closest and 1 being farthest. Most professional tools only use 0 to 1 scale. IllustrativeDNA Uses rescaled metrics, where distances are often multiplied by ~100 to produce two-digit integers (e.g. 2.0, 5.2). A standard genetic distance of 0.08 would be displayed as 8 on IllustrativeDNA. This approach makes the results more intuitive for a general audience. It's just semantics.

@Jason Voorhees
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2414763h and Jason Voorhees
good FUCK MUSLIMS

the jews bring them to eu and they rape white women
Muslims are not to blame for having succumbed to Islamic propaganda. They are not to blame for their country ever being Islamized. They are not to blame for the fact that some Mohammed fooled the Arab people. It is not the Muslims that need to be destroyed, but only the propaganda. It is necessary to kill the parents of Muslims and take away their children so that they can be raised as normal people.
 
Muslims are not to blame for having succumbed to Islamic propaganda. They are not to blame for their country ever being Islamized. They are not to blame for the fact that some Mohammed fooled the Arab people. It is not the Muslims that need to be destroyed, but only the propaganda. It is necessary to kill the parents of Muslims and take away their children so that they can be raised as normal people.
meant to be used to kill Muslim parents to save children from this wickedness
 

Similar threads

Jason Voorhees
Replies
10
Views
291
chadhamed
chadhamed
SlavojZ
Replies
2
Views
133
hasba1feuj
hasba1feuj
disillusioned
Replies
38
Views
1K
disillusioned
disillusioned
D
Replies
4
Views
507
saggyballsackcel
saggyballsackcel
PolisCommov
Replies
23
Views
2K
Lawton88
L

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top