ultrasonic cavitation machine it may help you 🤷

M

maka789

Bronze
Joined
Jan 9, 2026
Posts
317
Reputation
96
Hey I need help choosing a ultrasonic cavitation machine here are the pictures below and this can help other people as well


Pictures
IMG 0517

IMG 0516

IMG 0518

IMG 0519


Leaning towards 40k mini

Questions
People are saying uc melts fat correct but I also heard rf tightening your skin should you get both or just the uc

Also chat gpt said this : âś… On belly/thighs: cavitation has enough fat volume and space to break cells efficiently.
❌ On cheeks: cavitation energy disperses, mostly heats tissue, doesn’t rupture encapsulated fat.

My answer to this I won’t believe until I futher research more but just wanted it to be known if that make sense
 
  • +1
Reactions: ripikke
I’m gonna buy it tomorrow I make a new thread soon about my progress when I receive it my approach is gonna be 2x sessions weekly (Mon and Wes) still need to do more research and how long is sessions needed for I heard is recommended to take bpc and something else I was being told by someone he takes pills of some sort as well.

That being said I appreciate for letting me know I was leaning to towards buying the 4in1. I’m just gonna buy the 40k mini from here
You don't really need BPC or any of the other stuff, the effect on healing and lymphatic drainage is probably negligible. Again, most of that stuff is just people trying to sell you programs and guides.
 
You don't really need BPC or any of the other stuff, the effect on healing and lymphatic drainage is probably negligible. Again, most of that stuff is just people trying to sell you programs and guides.
So they probably help a little bit not worth getting? You think stuff like sauna or steam room can help lymphatic drainage or is that restarted
 
that antonio verada guy right? hes the tiktok dude thats popularizing this method. How viable is it does anyone know? I just assume he larped his results ngl cus like he also debloated a lot in general. is there any convincing literature on this?
 
that antonio verada guy right? hes the tiktok dude thats popularizing this method. How viable is it does anyone know? I just assume he larped his results ngl cus like he also debloated a lot in general. is there any convincing literature on this?
This method has been here for a while just got popular because of him then he claims it his methods. It’s like clav With fat dissolvers he doesn’t claim that his he just popularized it to the younger audience
 
  • +1
Reactions: revant
that antonio verada guy right? hes the tiktok dude thats popularizing this method. How viable is it does anyone know? I just assume he larped his results ngl cus like he also debloated a lot in general. is there any convincing literature on this?
The debloated is just losing fat I personally think that’s shits fake
 
i personally did aqualyx, worked fine
never tried uc
yes you need cardboard and a specific gel for it, bpc is a extra tbh
aloe works fine thats what ive heard its not really a specificccc gel
 
wait why not just debloat at this point? why take on this method without debloating first (unless u already have done that).

roi on this method doesn't seem that positive thats all. easier to mess up then progress forward.
 
wait why not just debloat at this point? why take on this method without debloating first (unless u already have done that).

roi on this method doesn't seem that positive thats all. easier to mess up then progress forward.
roi doesn’t seem good if you abuse it. But that’s with everything even fat dissolvers
 
roi doesn’t seem good if you abuse it. But that’s with everything even fat dissolvers
but with fat dissolvers isn't there less of a chance of messing something up? Seems so much more viable in the long run if you want to reduce facial fat as much as possible. also there's more literature backing the method (which i guess indicates it's more safer in a sense)
 
  • +1
Reactions: lebesgue
but with fat dissolvers isn't there less of a chance of messing something up? Seems so much more viable in the long run if you want to reduce facial fat as much as possible. also there's more literature backing the method (which i guess indicates it's more safer in a sense)
Yes it can come back with uc. I believe it’s higher chance with aqualyx to mess up but I can be wrong haven’t tried only researched a Littile. I assuming uc is more effective because you keep doing the sessions
 
I bought the 40k mini, waiting for it to arrive. The RF is mostly bullshit so you don't need the 4in1. Also the stuff about blindness is bullshit, I can't find a single reliable case report of retinal detachment from UC. Hearing loss is a real risk because you are vibrating your skull but just stop and move away from bone when it gets too loud.

From what I can see the blindness fearmongering is mostly coming from that guy on tiktok who wants people to buy his course, so he says you'll go blind if you buy the wrong device or don't follow his instructions or whatever. Just don't literally point it at your eye or periorbital fat.
Just bought mine today when did you buy yours and when is expected delivery just curious I ordered from this website from the photos
 
Hey I need help choosing a ultrasonic cavitation machine here are the pictures below and this can help other people as well


Pictures
View attachment 4535442
View attachment 4535444
View attachment 4535446
View attachment 4535447

Leaning towards 40k mini

Questions
People are saying uc melts fat correct but I also heard rf tightening your skin should you get both or just the uc

Also chat gpt said this : âś… On belly/thighs: cavitation has enough fat volume and space to break cells efficiently.
❌ On cheeks: cavitation energy disperses, mostly heats tissue, doesn’t rupture encapsulated fat.

My answer to this I won’t believe until I futher research more but just wanted it to be known if that make sense
Just found out the “creator of this uc method “ veredad or whatever said rhetorical will hit your the 40k uc thoughts he said it wasn’t safe
 
gray
wait why not just debloat at this point? why take on this method without debloating first (unless u already have done that).

roi on this method doesn't seem that positive thats all. easier to mess up then progress forward.
 
  • +1
Reactions: revant
but with fat dissolvers isn't there less of a chance of messing something up? Seems so much more viable in the long run if you want to reduce facial fat as much as possible. also there's more literature backing the method (which i guess indicates it's more safer in a sense)
you cant inject fat dissolvers in malar region, it is risky and ineffective due to the mixed tissue content there. thats also why liposuctions are not performed there
 
Hey I need help choosing a ultrasonic cavitation machine here are the pictures below and this can help other people as well


Pictures
View attachment 4535442
View attachment 4535444
View attachment 4535446
View attachment 4535447

Leaning towards 40k mini

Questions
People are saying uc melts fat correct but I also heard rf tightening your skin should you get both or just the uc

Also chat gpt said this : âś… On belly/thighs: cavitation has enough fat volume and space to break cells efficiently.
❌ On cheeks: cavitation energy disperses, mostly heats tissue, doesn’t rupture encapsulated fat.

My answer to this I won’t believe until I futher research more but just wanted it to be known if that make sense
What’s rf?
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top