averageblokecel
The forum just went down baby, down
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
- Posts
- 2,166
- Reputation
- 2,577
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=169128393&pagenumber=1
V-taper copers are mechanically inefficient. See punch power is determined by your core, the bigger the core the stronger the core and there's a common clause among v-tapers: narrow waist and hips. This is mechanically inefficient because the transmission of force from the core to the arms need use a curve while if the man were to be a block (narrower shoulders or broader waist & hips) the strength would take a much shorter route (with this force being bigger if the waist & hips are bigger).
Now don't get me wrong, childbearing hips are a death sentence, I'm talking about block, rectangles. Now I'm not going to post some profesional mma fighter but rather my body, the one of a normal human being and not some professional maxxer:
This is a block, as you can see I'm a rectangle, this is the best body for fighting:
-Takes harder punches because the force is distributed among the rectangle
-Big core for big punch power
-Big core & legs for balance
-(Optional) Big skull to take harder punches
Some people would call this guy skinnyfat, yet the skinnyfat block beated the v-taper aesthetically pleasing nigger
Guess who won? The block, the v-taper lost (even tho the v-taper is 1 or 2 inches taller)
Blocks are also more stocky, they can carry more weight with them. Basically blocks are like tanks, maybe slower but can take hard punches and are hard hitters and the bigger the block the bigger the threat (obviously a bigger block than me would beat me).
In conclusion: Lifefuel for stocky ectomorphs and endomorphs, it has been demonstrated that while it would make sense for a mesomorph to be stronger, the body composition of a v-taper makes him mechanically inefficient and so blocks trumps all; also girls are retarded because they'd rather choose a v-taper than a block (one is aesthetically pleasing, the other is actually useful).
V-taper copers are mechanically inefficient. See punch power is determined by your core, the bigger the core the stronger the core and there's a common clause among v-tapers: narrow waist and hips. This is mechanically inefficient because the transmission of force from the core to the arms need use a curve while if the man were to be a block (narrower shoulders or broader waist & hips) the strength would take a much shorter route (with this force being bigger if the waist & hips are bigger).
Now don't get me wrong, childbearing hips are a death sentence, I'm talking about block, rectangles. Now I'm not going to post some profesional mma fighter but rather my body, the one of a normal human being and not some professional maxxer:
This is a block, as you can see I'm a rectangle, this is the best body for fighting:
-Takes harder punches because the force is distributed among the rectangle
-Big core for big punch power
-Big core & legs for balance
-(Optional) Big skull to take harder punches
Some people would call this guy skinnyfat, yet the skinnyfat block beated the v-taper aesthetically pleasing nigger
Guess who won? The block, the v-taper lost (even tho the v-taper is 1 or 2 inches taller)
Blocks are also more stocky, they can carry more weight with them. Basically blocks are like tanks, maybe slower but can take hard punches and are hard hitters and the bigger the block the bigger the threat (obviously a bigger block than me would beat me).
In conclusion: Lifefuel for stocky ectomorphs and endomorphs, it has been demonstrated that while it would make sense for a mesomorph to be stronger, the body composition of a v-taper makes him mechanically inefficient and so blocks trumps all; also girls are retarded because they'd rather choose a v-taper than a block (one is aesthetically pleasing, the other is actually useful).