KeepCopingLads
Eugenicist
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2025
- Posts
- 5,102
- Reputation
- 6,859
As some of you may know, I am Afghan Tajik from Jalalabad, Afghanistan
After getting my shitty broad AncestryDNA results (which were 95% Hindu kush blah blah, 2% indo gangetic plain, 3% southwestern india)
I decided to try out vahaduo, i originally was going to use qpAdm but i genuinely couldn't figure it out
with the help of GPT I did multi and distance
with distance (measure of genetic differences between two populations, a lower distance means higher similarity), pakistani and eastern afghan pashtuns were up there with brahmin punjabs etc
distance dosen/t necessarily confirm which ethnicity you are or ethnic breakdown which is where multi comes into play
with multi i did:
cycles: 4x
fast mode: no
add dist col: no
print zeroes: no
aggregate: no for first run and yes for second run (i'll elaborate later)
on the first run i did:
Tajik_Afghanistan
Pashtun_Afghanistan
Tajik_Afghanistan
Pashtun_Pakistan
Kohistani
Hazara
Uzbek
and I got
for the second run i did all tajik, pashtun, kohistani, uzbek and hazara populations (since they slightly differ between regions/cities within countries)
if someone can help me actually read the tables i would appreciate it
(aslo aggregate combines similar populations which was why i enabled it in the second run)
@pashtunnigga1
@Ghoulish
@FlotPSL
@iwannabeloved2
@Ghost Philosophy
(I will also be forking over 23£ for illustrative DNA so stay tuned ig)
After getting my shitty broad AncestryDNA results (which were 95% Hindu kush blah blah, 2% indo gangetic plain, 3% southwestern india)
I decided to try out vahaduo, i originally was going to use qpAdm but i genuinely couldn't figure it out
with the help of GPT I did multi and distance
with distance (measure of genetic differences between two populations, a lower distance means higher similarity), pakistani and eastern afghan pashtuns were up there with brahmin punjabs etc
distance dosen/t necessarily confirm which ethnicity you are or ethnic breakdown which is where multi comes into play
with multi i did:
cycles: 4x
fast mode: no
add dist col: no
print zeroes: no
aggregate: no for first run and yes for second run (i'll elaborate later)
on the first run i did:
Tajik_Afghanistan
Pashtun_Afghanistan
Tajik_Afghanistan
Pashtun_Pakistan
Kohistani
Hazara
Uzbek
and I got
for the second run i did all tajik, pashtun, kohistani, uzbek and hazara populations (since they slightly differ between regions/cities within countries)
if someone can help me actually read the tables i would appreciate it
(aslo aggregate combines similar populations which was why i enabled it in the second run)
@pashtunnigga1
@Ghoulish
@FlotPSL
@iwannabeloved2
@Ghost Philosophy
(I will also be forking over 23£ for illustrative DNA so stay tuned ig)
Last edited:
Why it’s not surprising
Key Takeaways
