Visual Pattern Memory Test

[hypernormie]

Precisely.

The therapist said she usually plans how many tests I take each time I see her, but it's also not totally set in stone. Sometimes I go and do 4-5 tests, sometimes I spend too much time talking to her and end up barely going through 1.

Sure, I could tell you a few.

• Memorizing sequences of numbers and letters, then spelling everything backwards
• Mental math
• Basic education knowledge
• Raven's matrices and other stuff that is not quite but very similar
• Organizing cards in a logical sequence (usually it's cards with figures that tell an implicit story)
• Personality questionnaires
• Tower of London test
• Puzzles like organizing cubes of different colors to form a specific image
• Give the definition and meaning of a particular word

Also valid to mention that most puzzle-like tests have a time limit.

Yes standard protocol. It's interesting to learn they do (or can) administer it in sequences rather than as a complete one time battery.

How are you feeling about your performance so far? Anything in particular stand out as uniquely difficult or easy?

 

[NotAMogger]

Meaning shorter exposure to the pattern?

Yeah

 

[caff]

Good score. Was it Mensa.no, Mensa.dk?

Mensa says if you score within a few points of qualification on the online test, you have a good chance of qualifying on the real thing.

.no

 

[hypernormie]

Yeah

I'll have to try it out. Shorter than 3 seconds seems interesting. That's incredibly restrictive. What is your max score on that version?

 

[hypernormie]

.no

Maybe check out your local Mensa chapter

 

[MoggedSubhuman]

I feel dumb. I only got 13 because some of the patterns just happened to be simple geometric shapes

 

[NotAMogger]

I'll have to try it out. Shorter than 3 seconds seems interesting. That's incredibly restrictive. What is your max score on that version?

Don’t remember my max score because I did it a long time ago, but it wasn’t exceptionally high. I think it was 11 or 12 since I remember averaging 10.

 

[hypernormie]

How did you get to 18?

Doesn't the game get perma stuck on 15? or at least I was stuck there, did like 20 times the same level and no new block came?

i'm assuming 15 did not feel like your limit?

 

[nobodylovesme]

i'm assuming 15 did not feel like your limit?

Yeah, not really. I've done the human benchmark one and get like 17-19 on that usually, so it wasn't too hard.

Did this just now:

 

[hypernormie]

I feel dumb. I only got 13 because some of the patterns just happened to be simple geometric shapes

13 is above average by 2 squares so don't feel dumb. That score is technically superior.

 

[hypernormie]

Yeah, not really. I've done the human benchmark one and get like 17-19 on that usually, so it wasn't too hard.

Did this just now:
View attachment 4544289

Ah I see you've practiced so that alters the interpretation a bit but it's still very impressive.

Someone else commented that the exposure time on that version is shorter, is that true?

 

[nobodylovesme]

Ah I see you've practiced so that alters the interpretation a bit but it's still very impressive.

Someone else commented that the exposure time on that version is shorter, is that true?

Yeah, I've done it a couple of times, but it hasn't really changed where I started. Got 17 on first try and 18 on next (iirc). (Done these like a few times)

Hmm, it is kinda similar, but easier tbh, as the screen stays still

 

[NotAMogger]

Yeah, not really. I've done the human benchmark one and get like 17-19 on that usually, so it wasn't too hard.

Did this just now:
View attachment 4544289

That’s really weird. I got 13 on OP’s test, but only 10 on the human benchmark one.

 

[julioo27_]

4 am over here but i think its good for my first try, maybe i could get to like 17-18 if i focus like im on my finals

 

[hypernormie]

Yeah, I've done it a couple of times, but it hasn't really changed where I started. Got 17 on first try and 18 on next (iirc). (Done these like a few times)

Hmm, it is kinda similar, but easier tbh, as the screen stays still

I see the difference, it doesn't immediately progress upon each success and also doesn't immediately penalize you for errors, which allows more guessing around to find the right answer. It's a bit less rigorous. 17 is still impressive. I wonder how high you can score on the playparty version if it doesn't glitch out at 15.

 

[hypernormie]

That’s really weird. I got 13 on OP’s test, but only 10 on the human benchmark one.

Interesting because the humanbenchmark version seems easier

 

[hypernormie]

View attachment 4544320
4 am over here but i think its good for my first try, maybe i could get to like 17-18 if i focus like im on my finals

Very good. Try again when you feel more prepared. I'd be curious to see if you can. Seems most people posting their results are maxing out at 15.

 

[fatblackjewishwoman]

yes bro we are all top 98% jfl

also got 15

 

[BeanCelll]

15 on this and the benchmark one, but I have more experience with the benchmark from a long time ago.

I'm capped at 15 though, took until my last attempt.

 

[EthiopianMaxxer]

im too scared to do it ngl

i feel like i'll be disappointed with my result

 

[NotAMogger]

Also OP, you need to consider that people can cheat by screenshotting the page before the tiles become hidden, and show a score that’s higher than what it should’ve been.

 

[EthiopianMaxxer]

oh shit i actually got 14

i do not believe that 5-7 is average lmao

 

[julioo27_]

Very good. Try again when you feel more prepared. I'd be curious to see if you can. Seems most people posting their results are maxing out at 15.

take it for granted, btw i see you also are into psychometrics, i hyperfixated hard on it back when i was 16 or so, spent a whole year rotting on r/cognitiveTesting, made me blackpilled without ever me knowing it

im not surprised at people here getting high scores, i think you have to be roughly +1 sd if you found this forum on your own, normies spend their time on shit like soccer and gossip, not lookism

 

[hypernormie]

yes bro we are all top 98% jflView attachment 4544346

From what I can tell that is genuinely a top 98% score. I was equally skeptical but if you look at the norms for standard version of this test, average sits around 9-10. Feel free to check for yourself.

A couple of the scorers also report tested IQ's in the 125+ range which is far from normal sample size. Having three people comment with IQ's above 130 or very close is already not a typical population by definition. People have posted scores below 15.

 

[hypernormie]

oh shit i actually got 14

i do not believe that 5-7 is average lmao
View attachment 4544366

average is closer to 9-11 on the standard clinical version of this test, but that version doesn't immediately progress in difficulty the way this one does.

 

[hypernormie]

take it for granted, btw i see you also are into psychometrics, i hyperfixated hard on it back when i was 16 or so, spent a whole year rotting on r/cognitiveTesting, made me blackpilled without ever me knowing it

im not surprised at people here getting high scores, i think you have to be roughly +1 sd if you found this forum on your own, normies spend their time on shit like soccer and gossip, not lookism

Yes, I don't imagine we are representative of the population, nor do i imagine the people commenting their scores are even a representative population of even the people on this forum who took the test

Since you've spent time on that sub I imagine you've taken a few tests. Mind sharing your score(s)?

 

[birthdefect]

https://www.playparty.us/brain/memory/visual-pattern

The Visual Patterns Test (VPT) is the gold-standard neuropsychological assessment used to measure Visual Short-Term Memory (VSTM).

It was developed (most notably by Della Sala et al. in 1997) to isolate the capacity to remember static visual information ("what it looks like") distinct from spatial memory ("where it is").

This test measures Visual Short-Term Memory (VSTM) capacity, specifically isolating the visual cache.

It assesses the maximum amount of static visual information (pattern and form) an individual can hold in immediate memory, distinct from spatial memory (location or sequence).

By increasing the complexity after every success until a "3-strike" failure, the test establishes the user's Visual Span—the absolute upper threshold of visual items the brain can simultaneously retain before information overload occurs.

Take the test once in while in a relaxed state.

My score is 15, what's yours?

i got 15

 

[hypernormie]

im too scared to do it ngl

i feel like i'll be disappointed with my result

and yet you did well

 

[nxtrvd]

https://www.playparty.us/brain/memory/visual-pattern

The Visual Patterns Test (VPT) is the gold-standard neuropsychological assessment used to measure Visual Short-Term Memory (VSTM).

It was developed (most notably by Della Sala et al. in 1997) to isolate the capacity to remember static visual information ("what it looks like") distinct from spatial memory ("where it is").

This test measures Visual Short-Term Memory (VSTM) capacity, specifically isolating the visual cache.

It assesses the maximum amount of static visual information (pattern and form) an individual can hold in immediate memory, distinct from spatial memory (location or sequence).

By increasing the complexity after every success until a "3-strike" failure, the test establishes the user's Visual Span—the absolute upper threshold of visual items the brain can simultaneously retain before information overload occurs.

Take the test once in while in a relaxed state.

My score is 15, what's yours?

13, this was really fun

 

[birthdefect]

not officially but i got 128 on the mensa test online

yo same stats, mensa norway right?
did you get 142 on it when you were like 11 or 12?

 

[hypernormie]

15 on this and the benchmark one, but I have more experience with the benchmark from a long time ago.

I'm capped at 15 though, took until my last attempt.

Are you saying you were somewhat practiced? Or was that not really a factor?

Also did you feel like you could achieve higher in better conditions or did that feel like your true limit?

 

[hypernormie]

i got 15

What's the problem? That's a good score, don't be dissuaded by @Mess hitting 18, that result is genuinely absurd

 

[hypernormie]

i got 15

Ever been IQ tested?

 

[hypernormie]

13, this was really fun

Yeah it's interesting fs

 

[birthdefect]

What's the problem? That's a good score, don't be dissuaded by @Mess hitting 18, that result is genuinely absurd

i think ive gotten stupider since i was 11

Ever been IQ tested?

not officially, just online mensa norway
i got 142 when i was 11 and recent got 128
am actually convinced i got stupider somehow

 

[birthdefect]

Yeah it's interesting fs

gonna do the eriksen flanker task on the site and see what i get

The Eriksen Flanker Task - Can You Ignore Distractions?

Take the classic Eriksen Flanker Task and measure your brain's ability to resolve conflict. Can you focus on the target while ignoring the noise?

www.playparty.us

 

[NoaA99]

take it for granted, btw i see you also are into psychometrics, i hyperfixated hard on it back when i was 16 or so, spent a whole year rotting on r/cognitiveTesting, made me blackpilled without ever me knowing it

im not surprised at people here getting high scores, i think you have to be roughly +1 sd if you found this forum on your own, normies spend their time on shit like soccer and gossip, not lookism

Intelligence is the ultimate blackpill anyway. Arguably even above looks.

Low scores, of course, would rarely be reported here, though, and lying is far from uncommon.
I wouldn’t be able to confidently vow for the average IQ in this subgroup to be significantly above the general population average.

 

[birthdefect]

nigga its finished bro
i feel like the bottleneck isnt my perception but whether my hand can react accordingly with what im thinking

 

[birthdefect]

Intelligence is the ultimate blackpill anyway. Arguably even above looks.

Low scores, of course, would rarely be reported here, though, and lying is far from uncommon.
I wouldn’t be able to confidently vow for the average IQ in this subgroup to be significantly above the general population average.

i think if it wasnt for the tiktok influx there was definitely a point where average iq of the forum (and other similar ones) was higher than the average, even if by a little. average person 100iq is genuinely incapable of forming a unique opinion or thought from my experience

 

[hypernormie]

gonna do the eriksen flanker task on the site and see what i get

The Eriksen Flanker Task - Can You Ignore Distractions?

Take the classic Eriksen Flanker Task and measure your brain's ability to resolve conflict. Can you focus on the target while ignoring the noise?

www.playparty.us

I've also done Stroop and Mental rotation

For mental rotation I got 843°/second at 100% accuracy

 

[hypernormie]

i think if it wasnt for the tiktok influx there was definitely a point where average iq of the forum (and other similar ones) was higher than the average, even if by a little. average person 100iq is genuinely incapable of forming a unique opinion or thought from my experience

I completely agree

 

[NoaA99]

i think if it wasnt for the tiktok influx there was definitely a point where average iq of the forum (and other similar ones) was higher than the average, even if by a little. average person 100iq is genuinely incapable of forming a unique opinion or thought from my experience

Probably, but differences in average age and real-life experience also likely account for the perceived drop in intelligence.
Back then the average user was easily 18+, now it’s somewhere between 14-17.

 

[hypernormie]

View attachment 4544406
nigga its finished bro
i feel like the bottleneck isnt my perception but whether my hand can react accordingly with what im thinking

You scored average wdym finished

Here's what I got

 

[Framemaxxx]

15 honestly have no idea how some people get above 15 it feels absurd

 

[hypernormie]

Intelligence is the ultimate blackpill anyway. Arguably even above looks.

Low scores, of course, would rarely be reported here, though, and lying is far from uncommon.
I wouldn’t be able to confidently vow for the average IQ in this subgroup to be significantly above the general population average.

It most certainly is, especially prior to 2024

There's also probably a selection bias going on here, I presume smarter people are more interested in cognitive challenges and are more likely to click on this thread to begin with, let alone post their score

 

[Kind soul]

https://www.playparty.us/brain/memory/visual-pattern

The Visual Patterns Test (VPT) is the gold-standard neuropsychological assessment used to measure Visual Short-Term Memory (VSTM).

It was developed (most notably by Della Sala et al. in 1997) to isolate the capacity to remember static visual information ("what it looks like") distinct from spatial memory ("where it is").

This test measures Visual Short-Term Memory (VSTM) capacity, specifically isolating the visual cache.

It assesses the maximum amount of static visual information (pattern and form) an individual can hold in immediate memory, distinct from spatial memory (location or sequence).

By increasing the complexity after every success until a "3-strike" failure, the test establishes the user's Visual Span—the absolute upper threshold of visual items the brain can simultaneously retain before information overload occurs.

Take the test once in while in a relaxed state.

My score is 15, what's yours?

12,is it bad? I was kinda distracted too

 

[hypernormie]

View attachment 4544417
15 honestly have no idea how some people get above 15 it feels absurd

Tbf I feel like i could have gone higher than 15. the last attempt i failed i know for sure I was only one square off as I could picture the entire image perfectly except for the final square and I'm taking the test while experiencing significant physical discomfort due to injury. Without that i probably wouldn't have dropped that last bit of information. Would I have gotten to 17+? That's where I don't know.

great result nonetheless, have you ever had your intelligence formally tested?

 

[hypernormie]

12,is it bad? I was kinda distracted too

12 is technically one above average so not bad by any means. If you weren't distracted you might score higher.

 

[NoaA99]

It most certainly is, especially prior to 2024

There's also probably a selection bias going on here, I presume smarter people are more interested in cognitive challenges and are more likely to click on this thread to begin with, let alone post their score

Yes, I completely agree.

 

[fatblackjewishwoman]

From what I can tell that is genuinely a top 98% score. I was equally skeptical but if you look at the norms for standard version of this test, average sits around 9-10. Feel free to check for yourself.

A couple of the scorers also report tested IQ's in the 125+ range which is far from normal sample size. Having three people comment with IQ's above 130 or very close is already not a typical population by definition. People have posted scores below 15.

Theres for sure some people who saw your post, tried the test, got a bad result and didnt post it