Vitamin K2 Mk4 VS Mk7

[polishcel]

title.
is one form better that the other?
why?

 

[ltxkr2431]

mk4 is better because is from an animal source unlike mk7 that comes from fermented stuff like soybean, nigga do an effort and read pretty sure there is info about this already on the forum.

 

[polishcel]

mk4 is better because is from an animal source unlike mk7 that comes from fermented stuff like soybean, nigga do an effort and read pretty sure there is info about this already on the forum.

lol what do you care about an internet forum full of deranged incels

 

[Deleted member 23558]

yes mk4 is better. grass fed butter and avocados are a good source but be careful with the latter. i dont think they (avocados) should be consumed more than once or twice a week

 

[Deleted member 40621]

The large scale clinical trials are mostly with MK-4. The Japanese also have access to MK-7 and can produce it a lot more cheaply than MK-4 by using nato. Yet, they still went with MK-4. Most of the MK-7 trials so far are sponsored by either cheese or nato industry groups. There is notable lack of studies comparing MK-7 and MK-4. Probably because MK-4 will be found superior or at least as good as MK-7. The trials so far on MK-7 focus on comparisons with K1, which we know is inferior to the menaquinones. MK-4 is also the form used by the humans for functions such as electron transport carrier and co-factor for the carboxylation of osteocalcin. MK-7 is at best a surrogate for MK-4.

quote is by Georgi Dinkov on the Ray Peat forum.

 

[kotchfed]

quote is by Georgi Dinkov on the Ray Peat forum.

Can we see expansion of the cheekbones by using mk4?

 

[Deleted member 40621]

Can we see expansion of the cheekbones by using mk4?

Read Weston a price. He proves that a micronutrient dense diet is more important to a forward grown maxilla than mewing. However the micronutrient dense diet matter more when you are young and in the womb but its still a good idea to eat a micronutrient dense diet.