we could introduce gorillas into our society instead of locking them up in zoos

[Deleted member 5815]

Their initial test performances might be lower, their average IQ, etc. but this can be explained by nutritional and social differences due to their history of zoological slavery. Their propensity towards violent crime can be explained similarly. Even if these hold true after multiple generations and extensive integration attempts, we can be sure this is due to residual specieism and not innate genetic differences. So why not give gorillas the right to vote too?

 

[Deleted member 25534]

dogwhistle

 

[Squirtoutmabooty]

catscream

 

[Deleted member 18582]

The argument you presented is based on a hypothetical scenario where gorillas have a history of zoological slavery and subsequent nutritional and social differences, leading to lower test performances and higher propensities towards violent crime. While it's essential to recognize the ethical issues surrounding animal rights and welfare, there are several practical and philosophical reasons why giving gorillas the right to vote may not be a feasible or appropriate solution:

1. Cognitive abilities: While gorillas and other great apes demonstrate impressive cognitive abilities, including problem-solving and communication, their cognitive capacities are still significantly different from human beings. Voting requires complex decision-making, understanding of political issues, and the ability to engage in societal matters, which may not be within the cognitive capabilities of gorillas.
2. Legal framework: Our current legal and political systems are designed for human societies, and extending voting rights to non-human animals raises numerous practical challenges. It would require a complete overhaul of legal frameworks, rights, and responsibilities.
3. Representation: Voting is not just about the ability to cast a ballot but also about representation and the capacity to advocate for one's interests. While some people advocate for animal rights, it's challenging to ensure that gorillas' interests would be adequately represented in a human-dominated political landscape.
4. Informed consent: Voting typically requires informed consent, understanding of issues, and the consequences of one's choices. Animals, including gorillas, cannot provide informed consent or comprehend the complexities of human society and politics.
5. Different societal needs: Gorillas have different needs and priorities compared to humans. Voting is a human-centric activity, and it might not be appropriate to impose it on non-human species with distinct ways of living.
6. Human responsibilities: Instead of giving voting rights to gorillas, our focus should be on improving animal welfare, conserving natural habitats, and addressing issues like species extinction and environmental protection.
7. Ethical considerations: Advocating for the rights of animals is crucial, but it's essential to consider what rights are appropriate for different species based on their characteristics and needs.

Instead of giving voting rights to gorillas, society should concentrate on promoting animal welfare, conservation efforts, and ethical treatment of all living beings. This involves protecting natural habitats, supporting sustainable practices, and ensuring that animals are treated with compassion and respect.

 

[Deleted member 5815]

The argument you presented is based on a hypothetical scenario where gorillas have a history of zoological slavery and subsequent nutritional and social differences, leading to lower test performances and higher propensities towards violent crime. While it's essential to recognize the ethical issues surrounding animal rights and welfare, there are several practical and philosophical reasons why giving gorillas the right to vote may not be a feasible or appropriate solution:

1. Cognitive abilities: While gorillas and other great apes demonstrate impressive cognitive abilities, including problem-solving and communication, their cognitive capacities are still significantly different from human beings. Voting requires complex decision-making, understanding of political issues, and the ability to engage in societal matters, which may not be within the cognitive capabilities of gorillas.
2. Legal framework: Our current legal and political systems are designed for human societies, and extending voting rights to non-human animals raises numerous practical challenges. It would require a complete overhaul of legal frameworks, rights, and responsibilities.
3. Representation: Voting is not just about the ability to cast a ballot but also about representation and the capacity to advocate for one's interests. While some people advocate for animal rights, it's challenging to ensure that gorillas' interests would be adequately represented in a human-dominated political landscape.
4. Informed consent: Voting typically requires informed consent, understanding of issues, and the consequences of one's choices. Animals, including gorillas, cannot provide informed consent or comprehend the complexities of human society and politics.
5. Different societal needs: Gorillas have different needs and priorities compared to humans. Voting is a human-centric activity, and it might not be appropriate to impose it on non-human species with distinct ways of living.
6. Human responsibilities: Instead of giving voting rights to gorillas, our focus should be on improving animal welfare, conserving natural habitats, and addressing issues like species extinction and environmental protection.
7. Ethical considerations: Advocating for the rights of animals is crucial, but it's essential to consider what rights are appropriate for different species based on their characteristics and needs.

Instead of giving voting rights to gorillas, society should concentrate on promoting animal welfare, conservation efforts, and ethical treatment of all living beings. This involves protecting natural habitats, supporting sustainable practices, and ensuring that animals are treated with compassion and respect.

Gorillaist pseudoscience conspiracy theories wont be tolerated on my post this is dehuminazing and honestly disgusting they are just like us look

 

[mug]

Gorillaz

 

[efidescontinuado]

Niggers

 

[LooksOrDeath]

most high iq racebait post I've seen

though retards here make the bar low

 

[ranierean]

 

[Gonthar]

The argument you presented is based on a hypothetical scenario where gorillas have a history of zoological slavery and subsequent nutritional and social differences, leading to lower test performances and higher propensities towards violent crime. While it's essential to recognize the ethical issues surrounding animal rights and welfare, there are several practical and philosophical reasons why giving gorillas the right to vote may not be a feasible or appropriate solution:

1. Cognitive abilities: While gorillas and other great apes demonstrate impressive cognitive abilities, including problem-solving and communication, their cognitive capacities are still significantly different from human beings. Voting requires complex decision-making, understanding of political issues, and the ability to engage in societal matters, which may not be within the cognitive capabilities of gorillas.
2. Legal framework: Our current legal and political systems are designed for human societies, and extending voting rights to non-human animals raises numerous practical challenges. It would require a complete overhaul of legal frameworks, rights, and responsibilities.
3. Representation: Voting is not just about the ability to cast a ballot but also about representation and the capacity to advocate for one's interests. While some people advocate for animal rights, it's challenging to ensure that gorillas' interests would be adequately represented in a human-dominated political landscape.
4. Informed consent: Voting typically requires informed consent, understanding of issues, and the consequences of one's choices. Animals, including gorillas, cannot provide informed consent or comprehend the complexities of human society and politics.
5. Different societal needs: Gorillas have different needs and priorities compared to humans. Voting is a human-centric activity, and it might not be appropriate to impose it on non-human species with distinct ways of living.
6. Human responsibilities: Instead of giving voting rights to gorillas, our focus should be on improving animal welfare, conserving natural habitats, and addressing issues like species extinction and environmental protection.
7. Ethical considerations: Advocating for the rights of animals is crucial, but it's essential to consider what rights are appropriate for different species based on their characteristics and needs.

Instead of giving voting rights to gorillas, society should concentrate on promoting animal welfare, conservation efforts, and ethical treatment of all living beings. This involves protecting natural habitats, supporting sustainable practices, and ensuring that animals are treated with compassion and respect.

Is this AI generated?

 

[incelconspiracy]

already happened in 1865, nigger lover.

 

[Debetro]

if niggers are in society gorillas should too

 

[Deleted member 33275]

already happened in 1865, nigger lover.

beat me to it

 

[Deleted member 24278]