We should create a new system for rating women's attractiveness

L

LooksmaxxMyAss

Charismamaxxing is law
Joined
Apr 19, 2025
Posts
4,334
Reputation
6,026
1766595719685
1766595726355
There's no fucking way that she's borderline perfect. Her dimorphism and features are too masculine, her angles are too sharp. She's not fucking 9.75, she's fucking sub3 tranny ass subhuman bitch, but you shit eaters are all agree to consider this peace of shit to be stacy just because the math says so:feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh:.

I doubt that somone would prefer her over some feminine looking "HTB".

1766595912960


Mfs think that the same formula rating that they use for men will work for women:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: nsk4ll, BWCisLAW, moongazer and 1 other person
@Bobbyrino @Klasik616 @asdvek @zaebalsya @anxiety
 
  • +1
Reactions: BWCisLAW, moongazer and Bobbyrino
Womens attractiveness is 90% in the tits
 
  • +1
Reactions: ikramy, shmool, cjc and 2 others
Water
We should be rating women solely from an SMV perspective so that ass and tits (bread and butter) can actually help or hurt a rating
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxMyAss
Valeria is clearly Stacy
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Miki, zaebalsya and LooksmaxxMyAss
1766600268168

Beautiful
 
  • +1
Reactions: gymcel64
all these ratins are just too much
either attractive or ugly or average
View attachment 4459148View attachment 4459149There's no fucking way that she's borderline perfect. Her dimorphism and features are too masculine, her angles are too sharp. She's not fucking 9.75, she's fucking sub3 tranny ass subhuman bitch, but you shit eaters are all agree to consider this peace of shit to be stacy just because the math says so:feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh:.

I doubt that somone would prefer her over some feminine looking "HTB".

View attachment 4459155

Mfs think that the same formula rating that they use for men will work for women:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxMyAss
The highest stacies have a few masculine features just like the best chads have a few feminine features imo. Extremes aren't ideal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxMyAss and yussimania
View attachment 4459148View attachment 4459149There's no fucking way that she's borderline perfect. Her dimorphism and features are too masculine, her angles are too sharp. She's not fucking 9.75, she's fucking sub3 tranny ass subhuman bitch, but you shit eaters are all agree to consider this peace of shit to be stacy just because the math says so:feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh:.

I doubt that somone would prefer her over some feminine looking "HTB".

View attachment 4459155

Mfs think that the same formula rating that they use for men will work for women:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
I prefer first
 
Idc what anyone says about attraction tbh it’s very subjective to me and it will stay that way

No body is going to tell me what to find attractive and what to not lmao
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxMyAss
i prefer the argentine girl over the ai girl
 
  • +1
Reactions: CelestialJackrabbit

Similar threads

D
Replies
122
Views
48K
seven?
seven?

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top