They're literally everywhere online, these disgusting creatures
deal with it, they’re everywhere at your mosque. i see more curries than actual arabs or turks in mosques
I mean this is an incel forum your most likely gonna find incels/ugly looking people (you included)
I mentioned jeets not uglies
exactly its deplorable, their ancestors watched some guy supposedly split the moon in half and now hundreds of millions of them believe in it
not coping if majority of the mosques and even imams are curries in first world countries. just say you don’t like curries following your arab worshipping religion because of their subhumanity
i dont hate curries but majority of the hindus are subhuman in their behavior (also looks but thats irrelevant to me liking them or not).
i don’t know how common these hindus really are, now that i think about it. seen a few, but not that many. majority of curries i've come across allign with islam or at least claim to be. i dont see these kinds of curries here in the west. they're probably back in the slums if you come across any of that online. they're not the majority in the west, most of them wouldnt even do well socially in a western environment
many don’t follow it regardless of what they say, they only go or do these things for ‘face’ because of the social pressure tied to generations of their ancestors following islam
I never talked about their behavior in the West to begin with.
if you’re saying “they’re everywhere online,” the assumption is you’re talking about something representative, and they’re not. have you also considered that they’re like this not because of “hinduism” but because they’re like that because of environment? you could strip the religion away and they’d still be the same, loud, obnoxious, no self awareness, zero shame. the religion might amplify it, but it’s not the root. the issue isn’t a belief system, it’s the people
The type of religion amplifies and reduces it in intensity,
if you’re gonna bring up how widespread their behavior is online, environment and roots do matter, whether you care or not. you don’t get to isolate behavior from context just because you “don’t care” about it. that’s not an argument. if the topic is their subhuman behavior, then what fuels that behavior is gonna be talked to. no one’s excusing the behavior, pointing out why it’s like that isn’t the same as defending it
It does matter, but that's not a justification of the act itself.
or you could just say you don’t like curries in general regardless of their religious belief. that’s what it sounds like at this point. you’re not actually separating behavior. you keep acting like ‘muslim curries’ are exempt from this when they also show the same thing. and no one said their behavior is justified. pointing out the cause doesn’t equal approval, it’s just explaining the pattern. but if you’re too stuck in your emotions to process that, go ahead and keep repeating yourself that “they’re subhuman.” no one’s denying it. you don’t actually hate “hindus,” you just can’t stand seeing any curry online
not even about their religious beliefs, it’s the fact that they’re curry. you just project your hatred toward curries onto “hindus” because it’s easier than admitting you just don’t like them in general. you mask it behind religion to make it sound justified when you don’t like any in general for their subhumanity
I'm separating behavior. Why would I hate them if it weren't for their subhuman behavior?
Explaining the pattern does not do anything except reinforce my own argument.
I don't hate hindus, I hate curries that act subhuman, regardless of their religion, now whether their actions are fueled by the teachings of their religion is another point but irrelevant to why I hate them.
Provides 1 instance as if that justifies anything.
you’re not actually separating behavior, you’re just dressing up your bias as if it’s analytical. you keep repeating “i hate them for their subhuman behavior,” but all your energy is aimed at one group while giving the other a pass. you say muslim curries are exempt because of their religion but both have their fair share of bads too. that’s where your logic falls apart. if behavior is what matters, then apply the same lens across the board. muslim curries aren’t above criticism just because they follow the same beliefs you do
you keep saying that but then you turn around and link every subhuman trait specifically to hindus, while brushing off the rest as outliners. that’s not separating behavior, that’s scapegoating. you even admit that religion might fuel it, so you’re acknowledging the source while pretending it’s irrelevant
explaining the pattern doesn’t just reinforce your argument, it gives depth to it. you dont look at them as individuals. you claim to hate people for their actions, but then immediately say “muslim curries have less subhuman behavior in general.” so you’re doing exactly what you say you’re not, assuming based on the group, not the individual behavior
I just said that I am, how are you gonna decide what I'm doing and what I'm not when I'm clearly saying that I am.
Religion fueling it does not make the behavior acceptable.
No, it reinforces my argument because you clearly fail to even acknowledge that "Curry Hindu should reconsider their Subhuman Behavior" and then you claim that it is fueled by religion but how is that related to the fact that the act is wrong itself?
you keep saying you’re separating behavior, but the second someone challenges how you’re doing it, you fall back on repeating yourself instead of actually addressing the critique. saying “i am” doesn’t automatically mean you’re doing it well, that’s not how arguments work. just declaring it louder doesn’t make it true. no one said hindu and muslim curries are equal in behavior. the point was your method of exemption isn’t as objective as you think. you act like muslim curries get a pass because their religion rarely fuels subhumanity, but that’s just your own bias talking. you say you’re not aiming it at curries but the curry population “makes it more noticeable.” so you’re still generalizing based on what you’re exposed to, and then pretending it’s neutral
“most muslims aren’t like that” because islam doesn’t promote it is a cop out. every religion has contradictions, toxic interpretations, and people who weaponize it. you just don’t hold islam to the same level of scrutiny because you already favor it. if you were truly consistent, you’d call out all subhuman behavior with the same energy, no theological shields.
U follow for faith or social press?
You just yapped like 10 statements only to make one point "Muslim Curries get a pass because their religion rarely fuels subhumanity".
"Every religion has contradictions"
I do not keep throwing it, it's simply your reality that you're failing to admit.
the latter
a lot of what you said is just ego stroking and name calling just to mask how emotionally invested you are in being “right.” you’re not arguing, you’re spiraling. proves my point. muslim curries might show less subhuman behavior in your eyes because of religious teachings, but that’s a subjective judgment you’re making while dismissing other influencing factors like environment, culture, and experiences on it. you take one metric, amplify it, and pretend it’s the full picture. that’s not logic, that’s tunnel vision.
you asking for “one contradiction in islam” just shows your bias even more. if you already believe it’s perfect, you’re not looking for contradictions, you’re waiting to shoot down anything that even slightly challenges your narrative. i don’t do religious debates anymore, it’s pointless arguing about an arab worshipping religion whose own followers openly look down on south asians. you can find someone else to play along with a debate about a religion that’s riddled with hypocrisy and contradictions just to stroke your ego. you have obvious deep rooted racism against curries, even if they slap a ‘muslim’ label on themselves. doesn’t matter what religion they claim, you see them all through the same lens, as lesser people than non curry 'muslims.'
your “logic” is basically: do something, refuse to explain why, then cry foul when asked for explanation. that’s not debate, that’s emotional whining. you project your own insecurity onto me as if it’s some kind of defense. it does say a lot about the kind of “muslim” you are if you’re posting on an incel site, doesn’t it? kind of contradicting, isn’t it? to follow a religion that supposedly promotes discipline, humulity, and respect, while spending your time around degeneracy, nihilism, and self pity circles online. mashallah.
Not a subjective judgement when Islam is the religion whose followers are more faithful to their religion relative to any other religion.
Stop yapping, name the contradiction that you were speaking of.
This isn't an incel site, you fucking retard.
i don’t need to “name a contradiction” to someone who already made up their mind that nothing counts unless it fits their narrative. you’re not here for a discussion, you’re here to circlejerk your own ego.
“looksmax” is still an incel website regardless of what it calls itself. changing the name doesn’t change the content
you don’t have a very strong belief in islam, do you? if you’re on a site like this, built around altering your appearance, obsessing over looks, and feeding insecurity, all things that go directly against the concept of being content with what god gave you. to preach about morality and faith, but your actions show otherwise. if your belief was actually strong, you wouldn’t even feel the need to be here. hilarious. keep hardmaxxing and pretending it's divine. mashallah.
I'm not an incel, many of us are not.
1. I do have a strong belief
no need to name a contradiction when your entire existence on a site obsessed with fixing your appearance already is one
did i say everyone's an incel?
keep cherry picking a religion you don’t even fully follow, all the while spending your time on a site like this. keep pretending your contradictions don’t exist.
no need to name a contradiction when your entire existence on a site obsessed with fixing your appearance already is one
did i say everyone's an incel?
keep cherry picking a religion you don’t even fully follow, all the while spending your time on a site like this. keep pretending your contradictions don’t exist.
that’s just your desperate attempt to dodge the fact you’re caught in your own contradictions. whining about morality while drowning in insecurity. go back to your racist rambles and excuses, what a great 'muslim' you are. mashallah. keep pretending that’s piety."A pint of red herrings mixed with ad hominems plej saar"
Name the contradiction, stop deviating from the main topic.
And admit that your subhuman mind couldn't comprehend the difference between an immoral teaching and a teaching that could be immorally misinterpreted.
Thank you for the laughs, subhuman.
no need to when your very existence and racist rambles as a ‘muslim’ are one. may ‘god’ bless you with some self awareness one dayName the contradiction, stop deviating from the main topic.
And admit that your subhuman mind couldn't comprehend the difference between an immoral teaching and a teaching that could be immorally misinterpreted.
(subhu)Mans running faster than a cheetah
i’m not obligated to name any contradiction when your very existence and racist rambles as a ‘muslim’ are one contradiction by themselves. can’t even see the hypocrisy in your own words.
I just explained how it wasn't racist, you chimp brained faggot.
im not obligated to entertain someone that has deep rooted racism against south asians. once again, your very existence and racist rambles as a ‘muslim’ are one contradiction by themselves. there’s nothing to "debate" with someone who calls south asians slurs and openly mocks them. grow up, old man
