went to the mosque with thc still in me

[160cmcurry]

it was nice, felt the buzzes and jingles like it was these past two days



‘cannabis induced sensory alteration’

blimp bloop

 

[Pento]

Your Muslim? So many pajeets here

 

[isis_Bleach]

cannabis induced spiritual enlightenment*

 

[Ogionth]

For real man

Your Muslim? So many pajeets here

They're literally everywhere online, these disgusting creatures

 

[160cmcurry]

For real man

They're literally everywhere online, these disgusting creatures

deal with it, they’re everywhere at your mosque. i see more curries than actual arabs or turks in mosques

 

[Popstar867]

Your Muslim? So many pajeets here

I mean this is an incel forum your most likely gonna find incels/ugly looking people (you included)

 

[Pento]

I mean this is an incel forum your most likely gonna find incels/ugly looking people (you included)

I mentioned jeets not uglies

deal with it, they’re everywhere at your mosque. i see more curries than actual arabs or turks in mosques

exactly its deplorable, their ancestors watched some guy supposedly split the moon in half and now hundreds of millions of them believe in it

 

[Ogionth]

Majority of curries aren't Muslims.

Only 14.61% are Muslims

Cope more

deal with it, they’re everywhere at your mosque. i see more curries than actual arabs or turks in mosques

 

[160cmcurry]

Majority of curries aren't Muslims.

Only 14.61% are Muslims

Cope more

not coping if majority of the mosques and even imams are curries in first world countries. just say you don’t like curries following your arab worshipping religion because of their subhumanity

 

[Ogionth]

not coping if majority of the mosques and even imams are curries in first world countries. just say you don’t like curries following your arab worshipping religion because of their subhumanity

i dont hate curries but majority of the hindus are subhuman in their behavior (also looks but thats irrelevant to me liking them or not).

if they weren't so fucking retarded, i wouldn't hate them

i never expressed my hate towards those imams because they surely aren't as subhuman.

the internet is full of hindu curries spreading their shitskin behavior

 

[160cmcurry]

i dont hate curries but majority of the hindus are subhuman in their behavior (also looks but thats irrelevant to me liking them or not).

if they weren't so fucking retarded, i wouldn't hate them

i never expressed my hate towards those imams because they surely aren't as subhuman.

the internet is full of hindu curries spreading their shitskin behavior

i don’t know how common these hindus really are, now that i think about it. seen a few, but not that many. majority of curries i've come across allign with islam or at least claim to be. i dont see these kinds of curries here in the west. they're probably back in the slums if you come across any of that online. they're not the majority in the west, most of them wouldnt even do well socially in a western environment

 

[sluttysuzy420]

Bro I feel tlike the avg muslim Curry in the west has a horrible life. Trying to follow their religion and not party but being exposed to shit. I bet muslim foids got it even worse having to wear hijabs and shit when everyone else wearing skirts and shit. Hats go off to u. But im pretty sure weed is haram

 

[Pupur]

sorry for the racism in here. i once went to the church on shrooms. enjoyed the priest singing

 

[160cmcurry]

Bro I feel tlike the avg muslim Curry in the west has a horrible life. Trying to follow their religion and not party but being exposed to shit. I bet muslim foids got it even worse having to wear hijabs and shit when everyone else wearing skirts and shit. Hats go off to u. But im pretty sure weed is haram

many don’t follow it regardless of what they say, they only go or do these things for ‘face’ because of the social pressure tied to generations of their ancestors following islam

 

[WeiWei]

Muhammad was a pedophile. You stupid goatfuckers.

 

[Ogionth]

i don’t know how common these hindus really are, now that i think about it. seen a few, but not that many. majority of curries i've come across allign with islam or at least claim to be. i dont see these kinds of curries here in the west. they're probably back in the slums if you come across any of that online. they're not the majority in the west, most of them wouldnt even do well socially in a western environment

I never talked about their behavior in the West to begin with.

I said "They're everywhere online".

They're probably living in slums but that doesn't really justify their subhuman behavior online.

 

[160cmcurry]

I never talked about their behavior in the West to begin with.

I said "They're everywhere online".

They're probably living in slums but that doesn't really justify their subhuman behavior online.

if you’re saying “they’re everywhere online,” the assumption is you’re talking about something representative, and they’re not. have you also considered that they’re like this not because of “hinduism” but because they’re like that because of environment? you could strip the religion away and they’d still be the same, loud, obnoxious, no self awareness, zero shame. the religion might amplify it, but it’s not the root. the issue isn’t a belief system, it’s the people

 

[Ogionth]

if you’re saying “they’re everywhere online,” the assumption is you’re talking about something representative, and they’re not. have you also considered that they’re like this not because of “hinduism” but because they’re like that because of environment? you could strip the religion away and they’d still be the same, loud, obnoxious, no self awareness, zero shame. the religion might amplify it, but it’s not the root. the issue isn’t a belief system, it’s the people

The type of religion amplifies and reduces it in intensity,

you won't see Muslim curries being as subhuman in their behavior as Hindus.

Moreover, majority of the Indians on the internet are hindus so stop trying to excuse their subhuman behavior.

Environment, sure is a reason but how is that even relevant to my statement? I never wanted to discuss the reason of their subhumanity to begin with, only their subhuman behavior.

I don't care about the roots and it isn't what I was arguing about.

 

[160cmcurry]

The type of religion amplifies and reduces it in intensity,

you won't see Muslim curries being as subhuman in their behavior as Hindus.

Moreover, majority of the Indians on the internet are hindus so stop trying to excuse their subhuman behavior.

Environment, sure is a reason but how is that even relevant to my statement? I never wanted to discuss the reason of their subhumanity to begin with, only their subhuman behavior.

I don't care about the roots and it isn't what I was arguing about.

if you’re gonna bring up how widespread their behavior is online, environment and roots do matter, whether you care or not. you don’t get to isolate behavior from context just because you “don’t care” about it. that’s not an argument. if the topic is their subhuman behavior, then what fuels that behavior is gonna be talked to. no one’s excusing the behavior, pointing out why it’s like that isn’t the same as defending it

 

[Ogionth]

if you’re gonna bring up how widespread their behavior is online, environment and roots do matter, whether you care or not. you don’t get to isolate behavior from context just because you “don’t care” about it. that’s not an argument. if the topic is their subhuman behavior, then what fuels that behavior is gonna be talked to. no one’s excusing the behavior, pointing out why it’s like that isn’t the same as defending it

It does matter, but that's not a justification of the act itself.

Your argument is so bad that I'm struggling to believe you even are serious.

"Their subhuman behavior has roots,

So it's okay that they do this"

If this is not your argument then you agree with me that their subhuman behvior is bad and they should reconsider their behavior, then there's no point of you writing essays.

Maybe, you should read what I'm saying before writing all that.

Majority of the curries on the internet are subhumans, whether or not this subhumanity is caused by something else does not excuse it.

 

[160cmcurry]

It does matter, but that's not a justification of the act itself.

Your argument is so bad that I'm struggling to believe you even are serious.

"Their subhuman behavior has roots,

So it's okay that they do this"

If this is not your argument then you agree with me that their subhuman behvior is bad and they should reconsider their behavior, then there's no point of you writing essays.

Maybe, you should read what I'm saying before writing all that.

Majority of the curries on the internet are subhumans, whether or not this subhumanity is caused by something else does not excuse it.

or you could just say you don’t like curries in general regardless of their religious belief. that’s what it sounds like at this point. you’re not actually separating behavior. you keep acting like ‘muslim curries’ are exempt from this when they also show the same thing. and no one said their behavior is justified. pointing out the cause doesn’t equal approval, it’s just explaining the pattern. but if you’re too stuck in your emotions to process that, go ahead and keep repeating yourself that “they’re subhuman.” no one’s denying it. you don’t actually hate “hindus,” you just can’t stand seeing any curry online

For real man

They're literally everywhere online, these disgusting creatures

not even about their religious beliefs, it’s the fact that they’re curry. you just project your hatred toward curries onto “hindus” because it’s easier than admitting you just don’t like them in general. you mask it behind religion to make it sound justified when you don’t like any in general for their subhumanity

 

[Ogionth]

or you could just say you don’t like curries in general regardless of their religious belief. that’s what it sounds like at this point. you’re not actually separating behavior.

I'm separating behavior. Why would I hate them if it weren't for their subhuman behavior?

you keep acting like ‘muslim curries’ are exempt from this when they also show the same thing. and no one said their behavior is justified. pointing out the cause doesn’t equal approval, it’s just explaining the pattern.

Explaining the pattern does not do anything except reinforce my own argument.

Yes, muslims in general are exempt from their subhuman behavior because of the difference in teachings of a religion.

The subhuman behavior of hindus can be seen from the extent of hate crimes against Muslims in curryland.

but if you’re too stuck in your emotions to process that, go ahead and keep repeating yourself that “they’re subhuman.” no one’s denying it. you don’t actually hate “hindus,” you just can’t stand seeing any curry online

I don't hate hindus, I hate curries that act subhuman, regardless of their religion, now whether their actions are fueled by the teachings of their religion is another point but irrelevant to why I hate them.

not even about their religious beliefs, it’s the fact that they’re curry. you just project your hatred toward curries onto “hindus” because it’s easier than admitting you just don’t like them in general. you mask it behind religion to make it sound justified when you don’t like any in general for their subhumanity
View attachment 3804758

Provides 1 instance as if that justifies anything.

A religion's teachings in general can pursuade their followers to act in a certain way.

A religion with subhuman teachings would lead to subhuman behavior.

You don't see me condoning the subhuman behavior of a muslim either.

I hate people for their actions, not for what they are. If their religion fuels their actions then ofcourse I'll exempt other religions from that particular religion.


Muslim curries in general have less subhuman behavior than hindus due to their religion.

I wasn't expecting a good argument either so good job for proving me right.

 

[160cmcurry]

I'm separating behavior. Why would I hate them if it weren't for their subhuman behavior?

Explaining the pattern does not do anything except reinforce my own argument.

Yes, muslims in general are exempt from their subhuman behavior because of the difference in teachings of a religion.

The subhuman behavior of hindus can be seen from the extent of hate crimes against Muslims in curryland.

I don't hate hindus, I hate curries that act subhuman, regardless of their religion, now whether their actions are fueled by the teachings of their religion is another point but irrelevant to why I hate them.

Provides 1 instance as if that justifies anything.

A religion's teachings in general can pursuade their followers to act in a certain way.

A religion with subhuman teachings would lead to subhuman behavior.

You don't see me condoning the subhuman behavior of a muslim either.

I hate people for their actions, not for what they are. If their religion fuels their actions then ofcourse I'll exempt other religions from that particular religion.


Muslim curries in general have less subhuman behavior than hindus due to their religion.

I wasn't expecting a good argument either so good job for proving me right.

you’re not actually separating behavior, you’re just dressing up your bias as if it’s analytical. you keep repeating “i hate them for their subhuman behavior,” but all your energy is aimed at one group while giving the other a pass. you say muslim curries are exempt because of their religion but both have their fair share of bads too. that’s where your logic falls apart. if behavior is what matters, then apply the same lens across the board. muslim curries aren’t above criticism just because they follow the same beliefs you do

I don't hate hindus, I hate curries that act subhuman, regardless of their religion, now whether their actions are fueled by the teachings of their religion is another point but irrelevant to why I hate them.

you keep saying that but then you turn around and link every subhuman trait specifically to hindus, while brushing off the rest as outliners. that’s not separating behavior, that’s scapegoating. you even admit that religion might fuel it, so you’re acknowledging the source while pretending it’s irrelevant

Explaining the pattern does not do anything except reinforce my own argument.

Yes, muslims in general are exempt from their subhuman behavior because of the difference in teachings of a religion.

The subhuman behavior of hindus can be seen from the extent of hate crimes against Muslims in curryland.

Muslim curries in general have less subhuman behavior than hindus due to their religion.

I wasn't expecting a good argument either so good job for proving me right.

explaining the pattern doesn’t just reinforce your argument, it gives depth to it. you dont look at them as individuals. you claim to hate people for their actions, but then immediately say “muslim curries have less subhuman behavior in general.” so you’re doing exactly what you say you’re not, assuming based on the group, not the individual behavior

 

[Ogionth]

you’re not actually separating behavior, you’re just dressing up your bias as if it’s analytical. you keep repeating “i hate them for their subhuman behavior,” but all your energy is aimed at one group while giving the other a pass. you say muslim curries are exempt because of their religion but both have their fair share of bads too. that’s where your logic falls apart. if behavior is what matters, then apply the same lens across the board. muslim curries aren’t above criticism just because they follow the same beliefs you do

I just said that I am, how are you gonna decide what I'm doing and what I'm not when I'm clearly saying that I am.

"Both having their fair share of bads"

Are they equal? No, and that's exactly the point.

I'm not aiming it at curries but the population of curries makes it more noticeable, any subhuman behavior is not condoned by me as I've previously said

Instead of writing essays and telling me that I'm not separating their behavior, can you read what I'm saying.

Either you struggle to understand basic English or you're purposely tryna ragebait me.

you keep saying that but then you turn around and link every subhuman trait specifically to hindus, while brushing off the rest as outliners. that’s not separating behavior, that’s scapegoating. you even admit that religion might fuel it, so you’re acknowledging the source while pretending it’s irrelevant

Religion fueling it does not make the behavior acceptable.

The only reason why I exempted "most" of the Muslim Curries was due to the fact that Islam rarely fuels it, or if it is claimed then it is a misunderstanding of the religion.

Me saying that it was irrelevant wasn't in the way you thought, you just struggle to understand English.

explaining the pattern doesn’t just reinforce your argument, it gives depth to it. you dont look at them as individuals. you claim to hate people for their actions, but then immediately say “muslim curries have less subhuman behavior in general.” so you’re doing exactly what you say you’re not, assuming based on the group, not the individual behavior

No, it reinforces my argument because you clearly fail to even acknowledge that "Curry Hindu should reconsider their Subhuman Behavior" and then you claim that it is fueled by religion but how is that related to the fact that the act is wrong itself?

"Muslim curries have less subhuman behavior in general" because the religion itself does not fuel it, if the teachings are misunderstood then that's an individual fault and does not make the majority of the followers do the same subhumanity whereas if a religion is known to be fueling such subhuman behavior then the individual behavior leads to the behavior of the whole group because the whole group follows the religion that fuels it.

There are two possibilities,

1. You type but not read my arguments.

2. You're very bad at comprehending the very basics of English.

I don't understand how you don't get such an easy topic

 

[160cmcurry]

I just said that I am, how are you gonna decide what I'm doing and what I'm not when I'm clearly saying that I am.

"Both having their fair share of bads"

Are they equal? No, and that's exactly the point.

I'm not aiming it at curries but the population of curries makes it more noticeable, any subhuman behavior is not condoned by me as I've previously said

Instead of writing essays and telling me that I'm not separating their behavior, can you read what I'm saying.

Either you struggle to understand basic English or you're purposely tryna ragebait me.

you keep saying you’re separating behavior, but the second someone challenges how you’re doing it, you fall back on repeating yourself instead of actually addressing the critique. saying “i am” doesn’t automatically mean you’re doing it well, that’s not how arguments work. just declaring it louder doesn’t make it true. no one said hindu and muslim curries are equal in behavior. the point was your method of exemption isn’t as objective as you think. you act like muslim curries get a pass because their religion rarely fuels subhumanity, but that’s just your own bias talking. you say you’re not aiming it at curries but the curry population “makes it more noticeable.” so you’re still generalizing based on what you’re exposed to, and then pretending it’s neutral

Religion fueling it does not make the behavior acceptable.

The only reason why I exempted "most" of the Muslim Curries was due to the fact that Islam rarely fuels it, or if it is claimed then it is a misunderstanding of the religion.

Me saying that it was irrelevant wasn't in the way you thought, you just struggle to understand English.

No, it reinforces my argument because you clearly fail to even acknowledge that "Curry Hindu should reconsider their Subhuman Behavior" and then you claim that it is fueled by religion but how is that related to the fact that the act is wrong itself?

"Muslim curries have less subhuman behavior in general" because the religion itself does not fuel it, if the teachings are misunderstood then that's an individual fault and does not make the majority of the followers do the same subhumanity whereas if a religion is known to be fueling such subhuman behavior then the individual behavior leads to the behavior of the whole group because the whole group follows the religion that fuels it.

“most muslims aren’t like that” because islam doesn’t promote it is a cop out. every religion has contradictions, toxic interpretations, and people who weaponize it. you just don’t hold islam to the same level of scrutiny because you already favor it. if you were truly consistent, you’d call out all subhuman behavior with the same energy, no theological shields.



you keep throwing “you can’t read” as your fallback when someone pokes holes in your argument, but the truth is, your argument is just built around personal bias masked as logic. you don’t want a discussion, you want validation. if someone doesn’t echo your exact wording to your favor, you cry “bad English” or “ragebait.” maybe try engaging with the critique instead of dodging it with ego. maybe you should work on your english comprehension skills if you fail to process basic points without twisting them into whatever makes you feel right. don’t project your confusion onto me just because you can’t follow a simple argument without spiraling.

 

[mentally_ill_chad]

Allah shall rape you in the ass if you smoke sheitans plant

 

[sluttysuzy420]

many don’t follow it regardless of what they say, they only go or do these things for ‘face’ because of the social pressure tied to generations of their ancestors following islam

U follow for faith or social press?

 

[Ogionth]

you keep saying you’re separating behavior, but the second someone challenges how you’re doing it, you fall back on repeating yourself instead of actually addressing the critique. saying “i am” doesn’t automatically mean you’re doing it well, that’s not how arguments work. just declaring it louder doesn’t make it true. no one said hindu and muslim curries are equal in behavior. the point was your method of exemption isn’t as objective as you think. you act like muslim curries get a pass because their religion rarely fuels subhumanity, but that’s just your own bias talking. you say you’re not aiming it at curries but the curry population “makes it more noticeable.” so you’re still generalizing based on what you’re exposed to, and then pretending it’s neutral

You just yapped like 10 statements only to make one point "Muslim Curries get a pass because their religion rarely fuels subhumanity".

If their religion rarely fuels subhumanity then, their behavior is less subhuman in general in combination with the less population thus most curries are subhuman in their behavior, thanks for proving my point.

“most muslims aren’t like that” because islam doesn’t promote it is a cop out. every religion has contradictions, toxic interpretations, and people who weaponize it. you just don’t hold islam to the same level of scrutiny because you already favor it. if you were truly consistent, you’d call out all subhuman behavior with the same energy, no theological shields.

"Every religion has contradictions"

Show me 1 contradiction in Islam.

I favor it because it simply is better than any other religion, not because I somehow just ignored everything and favored it.

Toxic interpretations and the teachings themselves being toxic in every interpretation possible are two different things.

You clearly are mentally retarded because you have failed to comprehend even a single point that I mentioned in the argument.

you keep throwing “you can’t read” as your fallback when someone pokes holes in your argument, but the truth is, your argument is just built around personal bias masked as logic. you don’t want a discussion, you want validation. if someone doesn’t echo your exact wording to your favor, you cry “bad English” or “ragebait.” maybe try engaging with the critique instead of dodging it with ego. maybe you should work on your english comprehension skills if you fail to process basic points without twisting them into whatever makes you feel right. don’t project your confusion onto me just because you can’t follow a simple argument without spiraling.

I do not keep throwing it, it's simply your reality that you're failing to admit.

So, your logic is

> Do "X"

> Get asked "Why did you do X"

> Reply that asking you "why did you do x" is a fall back in the argument .


I've never seen someone so stupid yet so confident, but we all learn new things everyday i guess..


YOU have failed to answer a single point in the debate mentioned, with logicality yet you talk about logic.

It is embarrassing that you type essays out here yet not be able to comprehend a single point and keep strawmanning the argument.

I don't give a fuck about you (a person of subhuman intellectuality) wanting to echo my statements or not because you fail to comprehend them to begin with.


Project my confusion? What confusion, you literally can't even differentiate between a "misinterpretation" and a "teaching" with no possible "not toxic" interpretations.

How embarrassing of a man you are!

 

[160cmcurry]

U follow for faith or social press?

the latter

 

[160cmcurry]

You just yapped like 10 statements only to make one point "Muslim Curries get a pass because their religion rarely fuels subhumanity".

If their religion rarely fuels subhumanity then, their behavior is less subhuman in general in combination with the less population thus most curries are subhuman in their behavior, thanks for proving my point.

"Every religion has contradictions"

Show me 1 contradiction in Islam.

I favor it because it simply is better than any other religion, not because I somehow just ignored everything and favored it.

Toxic interpretations and the teachings themselves being toxic in every interpretation possible are two different things.

You clearly are mentally retarded because you have failed to comprehend even a single point that I mentioned in the argument.

I do not keep throwing it, it's simply your reality that you're failing to admit.

So, your logic is

> Do "X"

> Get asked "Why did you do X"

> Reply that asking you "why did you do x" is a fall back in the argument .


I've never seen someone so stupid yet so confident, but we all learn new things everyday i guess..


YOU have failed to answer a single point in the debate mentioned, with logicality yet you talk about logic.

It is embarrassing that you type essays out here yet not be able to comprehend a single point and keep strawmanning the argument.

I don't give a fuck about you (a person of subhuman intellectuality) wanting to echo my statements or not because you fail to comprehend them to begin with.


Project my confusion? What confusion, you literally can't even differentiate between a "misinterpretation" and a "teaching" with no possible "not toxic" interpretations.

How embarrassing of a man you are!

a lot of what you said is just ego stroking and name calling just to mask how emotionally invested you are in being “right.” you’re not arguing, you’re spiraling. proves my point. muslim curries might show less subhuman behavior in your eyes because of religious teachings, but that’s a subjective judgment you’re making while dismissing other influencing factors like environment, culture, and experiences on it. you take one metric, amplify it, and pretend it’s the full picture. that’s not logic, that’s tunnel vision.

"Every religion has contradictions"

Show me 1 contradiction in Islam.

I favor it because it simply is better than any other religion, not because I somehow just ignored everything and favored it.

Toxic interpretations and the teachings themselves being toxic in every interpretation possible are two different things.

You clearly are mentally retarded because you have failed to comprehend even a single point that I mentioned in the argument.

you asking for “one contradiction in islam” just shows your bias even more. if you already believe it’s perfect, you’re not looking for contradictions, you’re waiting to shoot down anything that even slightly challenges your narrative. i don’t do religious debates anymore, it’s pointless arguing about an arab worshipping religion whose own followers openly look down on south asians. you can find someone else to play along with a debate about a religion that’s riddled with hypocrisy and contradictions just to stroke your ego. you have obvious deep rooted racism against curries, even if they slap a ‘muslim’ label on themselves. doesn’t matter what religion they claim, you see them all through the same lens, as lesser people than non curry 'muslims.'

I do not keep throwing it, it's simply your reality that you're failing to admit.

So, your logic is

> Do "X"

> Get asked "Why did you do X"

> Reply that asking you "why did you do x" is a fall back in the argument .


I've never seen someone so stupid yet so confident, but we all learn new things everyday i guess..


YOU have failed to answer a single point in the debate mentioned, with logicality yet you talk about logic.

It is embarrassing that you type essays out here yet not be able to comprehend a single point and keep strawmanning the argument.

I don't give a fuck about you (a person of subhuman intellectuality) wanting to echo my statements or not because you fail to comprehend them to begin with.


Project my confusion? What confusion, you literally can't even differentiate between a "misinterpretation" and a "teaching" with no possible "not toxic" interpretations.

How embarrassing of a man you are!

your “logic” is basically: do something, refuse to explain why, then cry foul when asked for explanation. that’s not debate, that’s emotional whining. you project your own insecurity onto me as if it’s some kind of defense. it does say a lot about the kind of “muslim” you are if you’re posting on an incel site, doesn’t it? kind of contradicting, isn’t it? to follow a religion that supposedly promotes discipline, humulity, and respect, while spending your time around degeneracy, nihilism, and self pity circles online. mashallah.

 

[Ogionth]

a lot of what you said is just ego stroking and name calling just to mask how emotionally invested you are in being “right.” you’re not arguing, you’re spiraling. proves my point. muslim curries might show less subhuman behavior in your eyes because of religious teachings, but that’s a subjective judgment you’re making while dismissing other influencing factors like environment, culture, and experiences on it. you take one metric, amplify it, and pretend it’s the full picture. that’s not logic, that’s tunnel vision.

Not a subjective judgement when Islam is the religion whose followers are more faithful to their religion relative to any other religion.

A religion openly teaching morality and that teaching immorality will have followers practising morality and immorality respectively.

you asking for “one contradiction in islam” just shows your bias even more. if you already believe it’s perfect, you’re not looking for contradictions, you’re waiting to shoot down anything that even slightly challenges your narrative. i don’t do religious debates anymore, it’s pointless arguing about an arab worshipping religion whose own followers openly look down on south asians. you can find someone else to play along with a debate about a religion that’s riddled with hypocrisy and contradictions just to stroke your ego. you have obvious deep rooted racism against curries, even if they slap a ‘muslim’ label on themselves. doesn’t matter what religion they claim, you see them all through the same lens, as lesser people than non curry 'muslims.'

Stop yapping, name the contradiction that you were speaking of.

You have brought up a topic, now watch me destroy you.

Name the contradiction or shut your subhuman mouth.

Subhuman behaviour >

> There exists contradiction

> Get asked for it

> Well but you already believe its perfect so there's no contradiction

> You fucking subhuman, name it.

What an absolute retard, are you looking at what you're typing?

your “logic” is basically: do something, refuse to explain why, then cry foul when asked for explanation. that’s not debate, that’s emotional whining. you project your own insecurity onto me as if it’s some kind of defense. it does say a lot about the kind of “muslim” you are if you’re posting on an incel site, doesn’t it? kind of contradicting, isn’t it? claiming to follow a religion that supposedly promotes discipline, humulity, and respect, while spending your time around degeneracy, nihilism, and self pity circles online. mashallah.

This isn't an incel site, you fucking retard.

This is a looksmax site, go back to .is.

Again, I'm gonna disregard the rest of your yapping because there's no point just subhuman ramblings.


1. Name the contradiction

2. You didn't know the difference between an immoral teaching and a teaching that could be immorally misinterpreted

Don't run away and deploy your red herrings.

Get to the point or shut up.

 

[160cmcurry]

Not a subjective judgement when Islam is the religion whose followers are more faithful to their religion relative to any other religion.

A religion openly teaching morality and that teaching immorality will have followers practicing morality and immorality respectively.



Stop yapping, name the contradiction that you were speaking of.

You have brought up a topic, now watch me destroy you.

Name the contradiction or shut your subhuman mouth.

Subhuman behaviour >

> There exists contradiction

> Get asked for it

> Well but you already believe its perfect so there's no contradiction

> You fucking subhuman, name it.

What an absolute retard, are you looking at what you're typing?

This isn't an incel site, you fucking retard.

This is a looksmax site, go back to .is.

Again, I'm gonna disregard the rest of your yapping because there's no point just subhuman ramblings.


1. Name the contradiction

2. You didn't know the difference between an immoral teaching and a teaching that could be immorally misinterpreted

Don't run away and deploy your red herrings.

Get to the point or shut up.

i don’t need to “name a contradiction” to someone who already made up their mind that nothing counts unless it fits their narrative. you’re not here for a discussion, you’re here to circlejerk your own ego.

This isn't an incel site, you fucking retard.

This is a looksmax site, go back to .is.

Again, I'm gonna disregard the rest of your yapping because there's no point just subhuman ramblings.

“looksmax” is still an incel website regardless of what it calls itself. changing the name doesn’t change the content

Not a subjective judgement when Islam is the religion whose followers are more faithful to their religion relative to any other religion.

A religion openly teaching morality and that teaching immorality will have followers practising morality and immorality respectively.



Stop yapping, name the contradiction that you were speaking of.

You have brought up a topic, now watch me destroy you.

Name the contradiction or shut your subhuman mouth.

Subhuman behaviour >

> There exists contradiction

> Get asked for it

> Well but you already believe its perfect so there's no contradiction

> You fucking subhuman, name it.

What an absolute retard, are you looking at what you're typing?

This isn't an incel site, you fucking retard.

This is a looksmax site, go back to .is.

Again, I'm gonna disregard the rest of your yapping because there's no point just subhuman ramblings.


1. Name the contradiction

2. You didn't know the difference between an immoral teaching and a teaching that could be immorally misinterpreted

Don't run away and deploy your red herrings.

Get to the point or shut up.

you don’t have a very strong belief in islam, do you? if you’re on a site like this, built around altering your appearance, obsessing over looks, and feeding insecurity, all things that go directly against the concept of being content with what god gave you. to preach about morality and faith, but your actions show otherwise. if your belief was actually strong, you wouldn’t even feel the need to be here. hilarious. keep hardmaxxing and pretending it's divine. mashallah.

 

[Ogionth]

i don’t need to “name a contradiction” to someone who already made up their mind that nothing counts unless it fits their narrative. you’re not here for a discussion, you’re here to circlejerk your own ego.

Name the contradiction you subhuman.

If there exists a contradiction in topic X, then regardless of subjective beliefs, there always will exist one.

Are you fucking 8? How can you be this retarded

“looksmax” is still an incel website regardless of what it calls itself. changing the name doesn’t change the content

I'm not an incel, many of us are not.

Just because you're an incel does not make it an incel site, you subhuman.

By that logic, kiwifarms has many incel s so anyone that joins it must be an incel even though the forum is designed for something else

I can't believe you're actually writing this

you don’t have a very strong belief in islam, do you? if you’re on a site like this, built around altering your appearance, obsessing over looks, and feeding insecurity, all things that go directly against the concept of being content with what god gave you. to preach about morality and faith, but your actions show otherwise. if your belief was actually strong, you wouldn’t even feel the need to be here. hilarious. keep hardmaxxing and pretending it's divine. mashallah.

1. I do have a strong belief

2. Your ramblings are ad hominems which do not negate any of the arguments I mentioned


so once again,

Name the contradiction

and admit that your subhuman mind couldn't comprehend the difference between an immoral teaching and a teaching that could be immorally misinterpreted


Or keep quiet, shh!

 

[160cmcurry]

Name the contradiction you subhuman.

If there exists a contradiction in topic X, then regardless of subjective beliefs, there always will exist one.

Are you fucking 8? How can you be this retarded

no need to name a contradiction when your entire existence on a site obsessed with fixing your appearance already is one

I'm not an incel, many of us are not.

Just because you're an incel does not make it an incel site, you subhuman.

By that logic, kiwifarms has many incel s so anyone that joins it must be an incel even though the forum is designed for something else

I can't believe you're actually writing this

did i say everyone's an incel?

1. I do have a strong belief

2. Your ramblings are ad hominems which do not negate any of the arguments I mentioned


so once again,

Name the contradiction

and admit that your subhuman mind couldn't comprehend the difference between an immoral teaching and a teaching that could be immorally misinterpreted


Or keep quiet, shh!

keep cherry picking a religion you don’t even fully follow, all the while spending your time on a site like this. keep pretending your contradictions don’t exist.

 

[Ogionth]

no need to name a contradiction when your entire existence on a site obsessed with fixing your appearance already is one

did i say everyone's an incel?

keep cherry picking a religion you don’t even fully follow, all the while spending your time on a site like this. keep pretending your contradictions don’t exist.

"A pint of red herrings mixed with ad hominems plej saar"

Name the contradiction, stop deviating from the main topic.

And admit that your subhuman mind couldn't comprehend the difference between an immoral teaching and a teaching that could be immorally misinterpreted.



Thank you for the laughs, subhuman.

 

[160cmcurry]

"A pint of red herrings mixed with ad hominems plej saar"

Name the contradiction, stop deviating from the main topic.

And admit that your subhuman mind couldn't comprehend the difference between an immoral teaching and a teaching that could be immorally misinterpreted.



Thank you for the laughs, subhuman.

that’s just your desperate attempt to dodge the fact you’re caught in your own contradictions. whining about morality while drowning in insecurity. go back to your racist rambles and excuses, what a great 'muslim' you are. mashallah. keep pretending that’s piety.

 

[Ogionth]

that’s just your desperate attempt to dodge the fact you’re caught in your own contradictions. whining about morality while drowning in insecurity. go back to your racist rambles and excuses, what a great 'muslim' you are. mashallah. keep pretending that’s piety

Name the contradiction, stop deviating from the main topic.

And admit that your subhuman mind couldn't comprehend the difference between an immoral teaching and a teaching that could be immorally misinterpreted.





(subhu)Mans running faster than a cheetah

 

[160cmcurry]

Name the contradiction, stop deviating from the main topic.

And admit that your subhuman mind couldn't comprehend the difference between an immoral teaching and a teaching that could be immorally misinterpreted.





(subhu)Mans running faster than a cheetah

no need to when your very existence and racist rambles as a ‘muslim’ are one. may ‘god’ bless you with some self awareness one day

 

[Ogionth]

no need to when your very existence and racist rambles as a ‘muslim’ are one. may ‘god’ bless you with some self awareness one day

Name the contradiction, stop deviating from the main topic.

And admit that your subhuman mind couldn't comprehend the difference between an immoral teaching and a teaching that could be immorally misinterpreted.

I'd be racist if I hated the very existence of indians regardless of their behavior, which is not what I'm doing but you clearly are mentally challenged.

 

[160cmcurry]

Name the contradiction, stop deviating from the main topic.

And admit that your subhuman mind couldn't comprehend the difference between an immoral teaching and a teaching that could be immorally misinterpreted.

I'd be racist if I hated the very existence of indians regardless of their behavior, which is not what I'm doing but you clearly are mentally challenged.

i’m not obligated to name any contradiction when your very existence and racist rambles as a ‘muslim’ are one contradiction by themselves. can’t even see the hypocrisy in your own words.

 

[Ogionth]

i’m not obligated to name any contradiction when your very existence and racist rambles as a ‘muslim’ are one contradiction by themselves. can’t even see the hypocrisy in your own words.

I just explained how it wasn't racist, you chimp brained faggot.

You talked about contradictions in Islam itself so show me that you fucking subhuman.


Name the contradiction, stop deviating from the main topic.

And admit that your subhuman mind couldn't comprehend the difference between an immoral teaching and a teaching that could be immorally misinterpreted.


Brutal blackpill, can't even defend your own claims due to being mentally challenged.

 

[160cmcurry]

I just explained how it wasn't racist, you chimp brained faggot.

You talked about contradictions in Islam itself so show me that you fucking subhuman.


Name the contradiction, stop deviating from the main topic.

And admit that your subhuman mind couldn't comprehend the difference between an immoral teaching and a teaching that could be immorally misinterpreted.


Brutal blackpill, can't even defend your own claims due to being mentally challenged.

im not obligated to entertain someone that has deep rooted racism against south asians. once again, your very existence and racist rambles as a ‘muslim’ are one contradiction by themselves. there’s nothing to "debate" with someone who calls south asians slurs and openly mocks them. grow up, old man

 

[Ogionth]

im not obligated to entertain someone that has deep rooted racism against south asians. once again, your very existence and racist rambles as a ‘muslim’ are one contradiction by themselves. there’s nothing to "debate" with someone who calls south asians slurs and openly mocks them. grow up, old man

Name the contradiction, stop deviating from the main topic.

And admit that your subhuman mind couldn't comprehend the difference between an immoral teaching and a teaching that could be immorally misinterpreted.