What a "wide head" actually is

[Klasik616]

That's not what I meant. Turbomanletism is much more brutal than being moonfaced. I meant being 5'6-5'10 is less brutal than the difference between these two images:

Understood. I answered my own question soon after asking it. Interfrontotemporale:interpterion should be 1. If noticeably <1, you get the moonface look. If noticeably >1, the proportion between your interfrontotemporale breadth and the widest part of your neurocranium will get skewed.

In these images, the interfrontotemporale:interpterion ratio remained intact, but his posterior neurocranium was narrowed.

I was looking into the lateral insertion point of the palpebral fissure but gave up. If it inserts near the orbitale, then a narrow interorbitale breadth is what cucks someone's PFL. Otherwise, interorbitale breadth is useless like you said.

To an extent, yes. However, the original facial width idea I mentioned in this thread was closer to it. Interporion = inter-temples. IDT interorbitale was really significant in the discussion in that thread

I agree with you. I'm still trying to wrap my head around all this info. Can't formulate a proper conclusion rn

She looks like Michael Jackson in this morph

View attachment 3870087



She looks hyper-fishfaced because of her PFL. Brutal

Yes. Good point.

Two comments:
1. The ICD:IPD ratio should really be ICD:bizygomaitc or ICD:interporion/inter-temples(the reason I invoked the entire topic of interporion distance is because bi-temple breadth seems to be defined by it...it may not be tbh)
2. Type II also cucks your PFL, as mentioned by @mvp2v1 in one of his threads:

I think splitting it into types is pseudo-sophistication, however. Spacially close-set orbitals simply means having a low interorbital breadth. Does it really have anything to do with the moonface look in itself? I think, like you said, interorbitale:bizygomatic is a relatively trash ratio.

Actually useful info. Explains why my face looks bigger and wider after getting a haircut.