what happens if your Prenatal T is high but low Puberty T?

bobsmith03

bobsmith03

Diamond
Joined
Aug 6, 2023
Posts
1,311
Reputation
708
lets say you got the optimal amount of prenatal T but then your puberty T was low. what would happen in this case? and how to fix
 
Sort by date Sort by votes
Debetro said:
Explain female faces, who universally have shorter midfaces with higher FWHR.
Click to expand...
High FWHR is associated with High T levels in Men
www.sciencedirect.com

Telling facial metrics: facial width is associated with testosterone levels in men

High facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) has been associated with a cluster of behavioural traits in men, including aggression and status-striving. Th…
www.sciencedirect.com www.sciencedirect.com

and Yes this also applies to Women, Women with High T levels have higher FWHR and short midfaces, This is only accurate if the width is measured by cheekbones not soft tissues, Having high BF also increases FWHR and women generally have higher fat distribution on thier faces, As per FWHR and T levels, the rules remain the same

High T Women are often seen in Sports and they have universally higher FWHR

1698694961821
1698695009543

1698695110975

1698695136421

1698695186191
1698695215409

1698695260774
1698695389608
 
  • +1
Reactions: Saint Casanova
Upvote 0 Downvote
Gmogger said:
High FWHR is associated with High T levels in Men
www.sciencedirect.com

Telling facial metrics: facial width is associated with testosterone levels in men

High facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) has been associated with a cluster of behavioural traits in men, including aggression and status-striving. Th…
www.sciencedirect.com www.sciencedirect.com

and Yes this also applies to Women, Women with High T levels have higher FWHR and short midfaces, This is only accurate if the width is measured by cheekbones not soft tissues, Having high BF also increases FWHR and women generally have higher fat distribution on thier faces, As per FWHR and T levels, the rules remain the same

High T Women are often seen in Sports and they have universally higher FWHR

View attachment 2522364View attachment 2522365
View attachment 2522367
View attachment 2522369
View attachment 2522370View attachment 2522371
View attachment 2522372View attachment 2522375
Click to expand...
Most women have more compact midfaces/higher FWHRs compared to men either way however ?

Men have more variance.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gmogger
Upvote 0 Downvote
bobsmith03 said:
1.0 midface + 2 FWHR look so good. both for men and women.
Click to expand...
No, 2 is too ogre. 1.9 is already very compact. Unless you look like Barrett. I think 1.8 is perfect.
 

Attachments

  • EE80BBD5-627D-47B0-B884-37E1C7B6A1CB.jpeg
    EE80BBD5-627D-47B0-B884-37E1C7B6A1CB.jpeg
    164.2 KB · Views: 0
Upvote 0 Downvote
Gmogger said:
Barrett has 2.2
Click to expand...
I think it depends on whether it’s high because of large protruding zygos and wide maxilla or just a very low mfr( like jack ma). the former is much better for aesthetics.

Some people like Dellosia have quite a low FWHR yet look very good so it’s more about harmony.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
MaestheticMaso said:
No, 2 is too ogre. 1.9 is already very compact. Unless you look like Barrett. I think 1.8 is perfect.
Click to expand...
barret is 2.2 i believe.

Both my parents have 2 FWHR and 1 midface ratio.

dad might have 1.9 FWHR.

I can send pictures via DM. But they dont look compact like elias de poot or any of these psl models.

My bizyogmatic is 14.7cm.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
MaestheticMaso said:
I think it depends on whether it’s high because of large protruding zygos and wide maxilla or just a very low mfr( like jack ma). the former is much better for aesthetics.

Some people like Dellosia have quite a low FWHR yet look very good so it’s more about harmony.
Click to expand...
I personally think a high FWHR ideally 1.9 is always attractive, Some people might look good despite having low FWHR and not because of having low FWHR
 
  • +1
Reactions: Saint Casanova
Upvote 0 Downvote
Gmogger said:
I personally think a high FWHR ideally 1.9 is always attractive, Some people might look good despite having low FWHR and not because of having low FWHR
Click to expand...
What is Gandy’s ? Around 1.8-9? This type of shape is ideal for most people.
 

Attachments

  • 34C5AFC8-8616-40C6-BF30-F7885E294E60.jpeg
    34C5AFC8-8616-40C6-BF30-F7885E294E60.jpeg
    949.2 KB · Views: 0
Upvote 0 Downvote
  • Love it
Reactions: blamejewsjfl
Upvote 0 Downvote
Gmogger said:
What do you mean pseudosciene? This is why you shouldn't talk about something you have no knowledge over, Environment is a factor which contributes to how your face grows, Look at this example of 2 Identical twins with same genetic combination but one gets worse face development, Your habits and environment matters
View attachment 2522327
Click to expand...
they r just sisters, not identical twins
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

skell
  • Question
are long eyelashes high T or low T?
Replies
4
Views
65
nwed
nwed
darkblueinkel
  • Question
Looksmax RATE RESPONSE TO 250 T
Replies
4
Views
39
darkblueinkel
darkblueinkel
8ight7even
  • Question
What is your skincare routine?
Replies
7
Views
61
MagicalWaves
MagicalWaves
DopamineMaxxer69
  • Question
look young but have high test
Replies
29
Views
137
bubblebass12
bubblebass12
Ducan
  • Question
Looksmaxxing Puberty
Replies
3
Views
41
hollywoodngl
hollywoodngl

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 2)
Back
Top