What is the equivalent of Pulitzer prize for deciphering looks theory?

[Deleted member 23558]

Like Riemann hypothesis I solved looks, and that tall skull w compact midface, non bug or chink eyes, high set zygos and no huge recession is automatic 6 psl plus. I sampled 100000000 faces and not one broke this hypothesis, so my theory is true. Where to collect my million dollars?

 

[Deleted member 23558]

@St.TikTokcel @Marsik

 

[St.TikTokcel]

Like Riemann hypothesis I solved looks, and that tall skull w compact midface, non bug or chink eyes, high set zygos and no huge recession is automatic 6 psl plus. I sampled 100000000 faces and not one broke this hypothesis, so my theory is true. Where to collect my million dollars?

Here, sir.

 

[Deleted member 23558]

c

 

[Deleted member 23558]

@Pei @LeonidasGui

 

[LeonidasGui]

Wdym which dollar

 

[Deleted member 23558]

Wdym which dollar

cash money

 

[Lulleko]

The ceremony is being held at mumbai, that's where you'll get your prize offered by drago himself.

 

[greycel]

Idk why but intuitively I think to solve looks theory theoretically, you have to use a shit load of triangles on the face. Like cover the entire face in triangles of many sizes and compare how each interacts with another. Its all about angles and lines.

As for harmony, I think it's to do with the CORE of looks itself. When an artist draws a face, what do they draw first?

I may genuinely try to solve it one day, or I'll make a thread exploring the concept of harmony with specific combinations of ratios.
As for looks theory, it's more complex because it involves harmony in addition to angles and lines. And then you have to think about exceptions where a specific combination is leading to a reminiscent image in many people's heads.. i.e. the audience are making an "exception" to unideal ratios because of familiarity to it from their past.

So harmony -> ideal looks theory (robot impartial POV) -> ideal looks theory (human POV: appeal)

So much to explore..

 

[Deleted member 23558]

Idk why but intuitively I think to solve looks theory theoretically, you have to use a shit load of triangles on the face. Like cover the entire face in triangles of many sizes and compare how each interacts with another. Its all about angles and lines.
View attachment 2870071View attachment 2870075View attachment 2870078

As for harmony, I think it's to do with the CORE of looks itself. When an artist draws a face, what do they draw first?
View attachment 2870074

I may genuinely try to solve it one day, or I'll make a thread exploring the concept of harmony with specific combinations of ratios.
As for looks theory, it's more complex because it involves harmony in addition to angles and lines. And then you have to think about exceptions where a specific combination is leading to a reminiscent image in many people's heads.. i.e. the audience are making an "exception" to unideal ratios because of familiarity to it from their past.

So harmony -> ideal looks theory (robot impartial POV) -> ideal looks theory (human POV: appeal)

So much to explore..

wtf triangles to do with this

 

[Deleted member 23558]

Idk why but intuitively I think to solve looks theory theoretically, you have to use a shit load of triangles on the face. Like cover the entire face in triangles of many sizes and compare how each interacts with another. Its all about angles and lines.
View attachment 2870071View attachment 2870075View attachment 2870078

As for harmony, I think it's to do with the CORE of looks itself. When an artist draws a face, what do they draw first?
View attachment 2870074

I may genuinely try to solve it one day, or I'll make a thread exploring the concept of harmony with specific combinations of ratios.
As for looks theory, it's more complex because it involves harmony in addition to angles and lines. And then you have to think about exceptions where a specific combination is leading to a reminiscent image in many people's heads.. i.e. the audience are making an "exception" to unideal ratios because of familiarity to it from their past.

So harmony -> ideal looks theory (robot impartial POV) -> ideal looks theory (human POV: appeal)

So much to explore..

Omg it’s greycel

 

[Gonthar]

Like Riemann hypothesis I solved looks, and that tall skull w compact midface, non bug or chink eyes, high set zygos and no huge recession is automatic 6 psl plus. I sampled 100000000 faces and not one broke this hypothesis, so my theory is true. Where to collect my million dollars?

Pigasus Award - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org