what is your guys best argument for existence of blackpill

limerence

limerence

walking foid repellent
Joined
Mar 11, 2025
Posts
909
Reputation
595
make argument, ill critique.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Arminus and Lamping21
My life experience
 
  • +1
Reactions: Divineincel, momoil, Deleted member 177807 and 2 others
My life experience
the reason this isn't argument what happens of someone else says their life experience disproves bp, then who's right?
 
1767977303373
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: kiannnn, reemzy, Zeuxx and 4 others
stacy didn’t want to suck my cock
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
  • JFL
Reactions: kiannnn, Latinolooksmaxxer and kiing_ronk
the reason this isn't argument what happens of someone else says their life experience disproves bp, then who's right?
No one's life disproves bp, it's scientific fact. Only thing blackpill gets wrong is how they overexaggarate genetic determinism
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aox Ofwar and annenisikeyim
Basic biology and life experience
 
  • +1
Reactions: khhvfakecel, Deleted member 254380 and GonorrhoeaGobbler
No one's life disproves bp, it's scientific fact. Only thing blackpill gets wrong is how they overexaggarate genetic determinism
its not a scientific fact, its more like a branch of philosophy/worldview.
 
Basic biology and life experience
this does not prove anything, basic biology? what is that even supposed to mean, asserting muh its science does not demonstrate anything.
 
No one's life disproves bp, it's scientific fact. Only thing blackpill gets wrong is how they overexaggarate genetic determinism
what scientific fact would it be based on.
 
this does not prove anything, basic biology? what is that even supposed to mean, asserting muh its science does not demonstrate anything.
You are fucking retarded , delete your account asap
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: TiktokUser, Deleted member 177807, Notorious_1676 and 8 others
You are fucking retarded , delete your account asap
still waiting on how biology proves blackpill. can you point out to were the scientific study for living organisms proves this worldview?
 
the reason this isn't argument what happens of someone else says their life experience disproves bp, then who's right?
Im not a fan of extremes i dont see the world just black or white every pill have his arguments no one is right and our goal should be to find which pill is right.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Larpingcel and GonorrhoeaGobbler
Wouldn't say I believe all about the blackpill. :feelsthink:

However, the brutal one I'd say is the spawn-location pill.
Essentially you may not get the same opportunity as others, even if you have the same knowledge, money, intelligence and capabilities, if your country doesn't facilitate your goals, then it's over.

I wouldn't say there's no effort to be put, however starting position matters
 
  • +1
Reactions: aztecas
Wouldn't say I believe all about the blackpill. :feelsthink:

However, the brutal one I'd say is the spawn-location pill.
Essentially you may not get the same opportunity as others, even if you have the same knowledge, money, intelligence and capabilities, if your country doesn't facilitate your goals, then it's over.

I wouldn't say there's no effort to be put, however starting position matters
the main issue I have is people misunderstanding the word objective and just asserting it to be true.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lamping21
if I held your mom hostage would you suck my cock to save her life?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: PrettyLights and khhvfakecel
Wouldn't say I believe all about the blackpill. :feelsthink:

However, the brutal one I'd say is the spawn-location pill.
Essentially you may not get the same opportunity as others, even if you have the same knowledge, money, intelligence and capabilities, if your country doesn't facilitate your goals, then it's over.

I wouldn't say there's no effort to be put, however starting position matters
if everyone as a collective agrees certain traits to be desirable, that still does not make something objective which is what im trying to get at, its not necessary that the blackpill doesn't exist, just not in the same way people think.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lamping21
the main issue I have is people misunderstanding the word objective and just asserting it to be true.
I see. Definitely in life some may have their own objective truth, as our beliefs are based on the things we see.

The things happening around us may enforce or destroy our beliefs
 
still waiting on how biology proves blackpill. can you point out to were the scientific study for living organisms proves this worldview?
Biological reason for living is to reproduce. The question in the animal kingdom is 'which potential mate will bear the most fit children?'
It's why women will choose the gentically superior (tall, symmetrical, bone structure) and more successful individual over a fucking stupid indian larp like u
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: GonorrhoeaGobbler, kiing_ronk and PrettyLights
I see. Definitely in life some may have their own objective truth, as our beliefs are based on the things we see.

The things happening around us may enforce or destroy our beliefs
objectivity is not based on human opinion, but is mind independent, immutable, math, logic, ect.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Lamping21
Im not a fan of extremes i dont see the world just black or white every pill have his arguments no one is right and our goal should be to find which pill is right.
yes every pills advice on dating is correct, the :bluepill: works for chad, the red:redpill: works for lucky (moneymaxxing is mainly luck) and fat htn and the:blackpill: i when it's all failed and you become depressed bc it's o v e r

unfortunately we have :bluepill:lers going straight to :blackpill: at the 15
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aox Ofwar and Coping Truecel
Biological reason for living is to reproduce. The question in the animal kingdom is 'which potential mate will bear the most fit children'. It's why women will choose the gentically superior (tall, symmetrical, bone structure) and more successful individual over a fucking stupid indian larp like u
this is just regurgitating evolutionary psychology which is a theory that has a foundation in evolution, which we know is complete bs, just bc we can observe something happening like hypergamy, does not mean its programmed through biology, we would have to see evidence for that instead of just yapping and asserting, I agree hypergamy and the blackpill exists, but not in the way you think.
 
objectivity is not based on human opinion, but is mind independent, immutable, math, logic, ect.
Yes, true tho. I just threw the word "objective" randomly:lul:
 
make argument, ill critique.
I remember i used to be a ugly ass mf and nobody treated me seriously especially women and i didn't get any attention i got better looks and suddenly people wanna be friends with me talk i get treated seriously etc :lul::lul:, also I've seen girls that are subhuman talk about other niggas that "eww he's too short" "he's ugly" "pepperoni pizza face" etc. judging because of looks is insane but it's part of "human instincts and nature" if someone has low eq which most foids do :forcedsmile:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: PrettyLights
Yes, true tho. I just threw the word "objective" randomly:lul:
I dont disagree with the hypergamy of foids, and the state the west has been in, all im simply doing is correcting people in this communities misuse of wordings and sophistry.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lamping21
the type of women you are able to attract without money or rape should be all the black pilling evidence you need ngl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 254380
I remember i used to be a ugly ass mf and nobody treated me seriously especially women and i didn't get any attention i got better looks and suddenly people wanna be friends with me talk i get treated seriously etc :lul::lul:, also I've seen girls that are subhuman talk about other niggas that "eww he's too short" "he's ugly" "pepperoni pizza face" etc. judging because of looks is insane but it's part of "human instincts and nature" if someone has low eq which most foids do :forcedsmile:
this is your personal experience for sure, and im not denying its true, I've had similar experiences, all im asking is to ask you, how does that make looks objectively true, if 99% of the population agreed on a certain set of desired traits would that make those traits suddenly desirable based on biology?
 
  • +1
Reactions: satangoy
with that being said. you look mexican so i would advise you to jump off the nearest building you can find asap or drink bleach
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 254380 and khhvfakecel
the type of women you are able to attract without money or rape should be all the black pilling evidence you need ngl
that's not what im saying tho, I agree it exists as a concept im simply asking for proof of its objectivity, because 99% of the population can agree certain traits are desirable that doesn't make it objective, im alr conceding hypergamy and genetic determinism exists to an extent.
 
that's not what im saying tho, I agree it exists as a concept im simply asking for proof of its objectivity, because 99% of the population can agree certain traits are desirable that doesn't make it objective, im alr conceding hypergamy and genetic determinism exists to an extent.
i think you badly need to go out with someone who mogs you to death. i hate arguing with bluepillers
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 254380 and Latinolooksmaxxer
this is just regurgitating evolutionary psychology which is a theory that has a foundation in evolution, which we know is complete bs, just bc we can observe something happening like hypergamy, does not mean its programmed through biology, we would have to see evidence for that instead of just yapping and asserting, I agree hypergamy and the blackpill exists, but not in the way you think.
nigger u are grey. It doesnt matter what way we think it exists, it still exists. Hypergamy may be a by product of evolution but pyhsical appearance and aesthetics are evolutionary traits that most definitely matter. Ur like 13 and havent experienced the brutal reality of the real world
Also just say animals dont care appearance at all, (they do btw.) Humans still will do, we treat things more aestethically pleasing much better than their uglier counterparts - so many studies everywhere and ur still being an ignorant currycel
 
that's not what im saying tho, I agree it exists as a concept im simply asking for proof of its objectivity, because 99% of the population can agree certain traits are desirable that doesn't make it objective, im alr conceding hypergamy and genetic determinism exists to an extent.
Your js getting philospical now. If society agrees soemthing is objective it just means what the majority agrees. If someone says morals are objective/ subjective, neither of them are wrong.
If majority of humans think a trait is desirable, it makes it an objectively desirable trait. Thats js how scientist view it, your a stupid bluepiller who can't cope with facts
Delete this gay ass thread u started
 
nigger u are grey. It doesnt matter what way we think it exists, it still exists. Hypergamy may be a by product of evolution but pyhsical appearance and aesthetics are evolutionary traits that most definitely matter. Ur like 13 and havent experienced the brutal reality of the real world
Also just say animals dont care appearance at all, (they do btw.) Humans still will do, we treat things more aestethically pleasing much better than their uglier counterparts - so many studies everywhere and ur still being an ignorant currycel
that's kind my point if its a product of evolution, first evolution has to be proven, for their to be an argument for it being true. evolutionary psychology, when biological instinct makes you desire certain traits is complete bs. any studies you cite can just assume the position, if you assume that x amount of women say they prefer this height, doesn't mean its because of biology. appearance matters, I don't disagree. also saying it doesn't matter if you think it exists, it exists is the same thing as me asserting a magical unicorn exists because it exists. that does not provide proof of the existence of a thing. Furthermore when you say something exists you step into the realm of metaphysics so you would have to provide your criteria of epistemology for how that thing exists.
 
1767979234015
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 254380
good looking guys get more girls and social status than ugly guys with the same income levels and skillset

its not rocket science
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 254380
that's kind my point if its a product of evolution, first evolution has to be proven, for their to be an argument for it being true. evolutionary psychology, when biological instinct makes you desire certain traits is complete bs. any studies you cite can just assume the position, if you assume that x amount of women say they prefer this height, doesn't mean its because of biology. appearance matters, I don't disagree. also saying it doesn't matter if you think it exists, it exists is the same thing as me asserting a magical unicorn exists because it exists. that does not provide proof of the existence of a thing. Furthermore when you say something exists you step into the realm of metaphysics so you would have to provide your criteria of epistemology for how that thing exists.
You are an uneducated little child. Everything in science is theoritcal
 
Your js getting philospical now. If society agrees soemthing is objective it just means what the majority agrees. If someone says morals are objective/ subjective, neither of them are wrong.
If majority of humans think a trait is desirable, it makes it an objectively desirable trait. Thats js how scientist view it, your a stupid bluepiller who can't cope with facts
Delete this gay ass thread u started
that's were you misunderstand what objective means, does not matter what society thinks, objective is true regardless of opinion, anything immutable/subject to change cannot be objective, math, and laws of logic are true and always true regardless of humans opinions about them, if one day we all woke up and decided 1+1=3 that wouldn't change its value. objective = mind independent/always true.
 
You are an uneducated little child. Everything in science is theoritcal
according to your definition of objective if every human agreed they were unicorns then it would be objectively true.
 
that's were you misunderstand what objective means, does not matter what society thinks, objective is true regardless of opinion, anything immutable/subject to change cannot be objective, math, and laws of logic are true and always true regardless of humans opinions about them, if one day we all woke up and decided 1+1=3 that wouldn't change its value. objective = mind independent/always true.
i have AS level in philosophy, im not misunderstanding shit. If we all wanteed 1+1=3 then 1+1 would infact =3. Math is just humans observing the real world, its not objective values lmao
 
according to your definition of objective if every human agreed they were unicorns then it would be objectively true.
Objective definition: (of a person or their judgement) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.
Unicorns do not exist hence rendering ur scenario inaccurate. U are a fucking dumbass brownie who doesnt understand the language he is speaking, hop off lil nigga
 
  • +1
Reactions: TiktokUser
i have AS level in philosophy, im not misunderstanding shit. If we all wanteed 1+1=3 then 1+1 would infact =3. Math is just humans observing the real world, its not objective values lmao
see that's the issue with your worldview. you claim math is just a reflection of reality but that's begging the question, why would reality have any sort of uniformity.
 
that's the materialist definition nigga, im not a sophist fag like you.
Objective definition: (of a person or their judgement) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.
Unicorns do not exist hence rendering ur scenario inaccurate. U are a fucking dumbass brownie who doesnt understand the language he is speaking, hop off lil nigga
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: TiktokUser
Objective definition: (of a person or their judgement) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.
Unicorns do not exist hence rendering ur scenario inaccurate. U are a fucking dumbass brownie who doesnt understand the language he is speaking, hop off lil nigga
so laws of logic didn't exist prior to human minds are you a fucking retard :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
that's the materialist definition nigga, im not a sophist fag like you.
Then dont talk abt a philosophic topic stupid fucking currycel. Talking abt hypothetics and physocology. Retarded negroe graduate college first before tryna debate. Genuinely subIQ
 
  • +1
Reactions: TiktokUser
make argument, ill critique.
Dating apps
Current men inceldom stats
Men without children
Lonely men
More women on universities than men
Men at social media with higher followers are good looking
Pretty women and OF
Women dating privileges
 
  • +1
Reactions: limerence
Then dont talk abt a philosophic topic stupid fucking currycel. Talking abt hypothetics and physocology. Retarded negroe graduate college first before tryna debate. Genuinely subIQ
your the subiq according to your view laws of logic didn't exist prior to human minds?
 
so laws of logic didn't exist prior to human minds are you a fucking retard :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Law of logic is a philosophical thought, how does it apply to what i said dumbass
 
  • +1
Reactions: annenisikeyim and Klasik616

Similar threads

kai11
Replies
20
Views
101
kai11
kai11
Jason Voorhees
Replies
48
Views
406
Outlander
Outlander
Im sorry mother
Replies
32
Views
139
dragomog
dragomog
dışlanmış sub3
Replies
21
Views
67
TheTallnUgly
T

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top