what is your guys best argument for existence of blackpill

Law of logic is a philosophical thought, how does it apply to what i said dumbass
law of non contradiction, A cannot be A and not-A” according to you didn't exist before humans "made it up" bc its a "product of thought" so you just completely destroyed all of reality, now there could have been dinosaur existing and not existing at the same time.
 
Dating apps
Current men inceldom stats
Men without children
Lonely men
More women on universities than men
Men at social media with higher followers are good looking
Pretty women and OF
Women dating privileges
I agree with most exept inceldom stats, if your referring to the same study im thinking of, was disproven.
 
Horn effect
 
law of non contradiction, A cannot be A and not-A” according to you didn't exist before humans "made it up" bc its a "product of thought" so you just completely destroyed all of reality, now there could have been dinosaur existing and not existing at the same time.
Their could be a dinosaur like that. One that existed, but if we havent discovered it yet then it's deemed as nonexistent
This is literally just Schrodinger's thought but outside of quantum physics.

Look u dont have adequate knowlegde in philosophy and u call me a sophist as an insult, stop using philisophical hypothetics as an argument
 
Their could be a dinosaur like that. One that existed, but if we havent discovered it yet then it's deemed as nonexistent
This is literally just Schrodinger's thought but outside of quantum physics.

Look u dont have adequate knowlegde in philosophy and u call me a sophist as an insult, stop using philisophical hypothetics as an argument
Schrodinger is a retard, contradict law of non contradiction.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: khhvfakecel
Their could be a dinosaur like that. One that existed, but if we havent discovered it yet then it's deemed as nonexistent
This is literally just Schrodinger's thought but outside of quantum physics.

Look u dont have adequate knowlegde in philosophy and u call me a sophist as an insult, stop using philisophical hypothetics as an argument
im aware im not that knowledgeable in philosophy but I don't rlly need to be when your position is that absurd that your able to deny axioms like its nothing.
 
im aware im not that knowledgeable in philosophy but I don't rlly need to be when your position is that absurd that your able to deny axioms like its nothing.
What axiom did i deny?? Hypothetics cannot be axioms btw.
we can stop arguing now, u are js critiquing for the sake of critiquing. ur criticism holds no value - it is a scientific fact that looksim exists, especially in humans
 
this does not prove anything, basic biology? what is that even supposed to mean, asserting muh its science does not demonstrate anything.
you search your other gender to procreate. like birds as example the big ones the more colorful ones take the girls bro u never ever watched any nat geo?
 
What axiom did i deny?? Hypothetics cannot be axioms btw.
we can stop arguing now, u are js critiquing for the sake of critiquing. ur criticism holds no value - it is a scientific fact that looksim exists, especially in humans
logic is a axiom Brodie, you denied existence of logic posterior to human minds.
 
you search your other gender to procreate. like birds as example the big ones the more colorful ones take the girls bro u never ever watched any nat geo?
I get what your saying but thats just a theory, there is no proof that we are biologically programmed to desire certain characteristics.
 
I get what your saying but thats just a theory, there is no proof that we are biologically programmed to desire certain characteristics.
you literally do as it mostly means looking good is being superior to others my man why girls want tall or handsome or strong it indicates their genetics level to procreate you are meant to procreate and with best genetics like everyone likes someone beatiful women use makeup to imitate their superiours
 
you literally do as it mostly means looking good is being superior to others my man why girls want tall or handsome or strong it indicates their genetics level to procreate you are meant to procreate and with best genetics like everyone likes someone beatiful women use makeup to imitate their superiours
saying someone "just does something" doesn't provide justification for that said thing to be true, its quite literally just an assertion. your also assuming your opinion within the evidence we have observed, we have seen women desire tall men, but that doesn't prove a genetic desire for certain traits when we can have better explanations. If you assume there is only one explanation for a study, that in it self doesn't prove your position.
 
my dih gets hard when i look at foids but foids dont get wet when they look at me
 
my dih gets hard when i look at foids but foids dont get wet when they look at me
best argument out of every single comment in this thread. I don't think I can refute this.
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: enchanted_elixir and silently_said
my dih gets hard when i look at foids but foids dont get wet when they look at me
wait foids look at you? thats a new one thats never happened to me?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: silently_said
make argument, ill critique.
Looksmax to exhaustion, then compare the change in your social status.
Or watch the change in the social status of others who have done that.
 
When I take a look in the mirror.
 
make argument, ill critique.
BP is always proven unfortunately, People have forgotten Incels are human beings too every-day online people mock us for wanting to improve our looks and wanting to be seen as human, people delude themselves in cope
 
  • +1
Reactions: khhvfakecel
I get what your saying but thats just a theory, there is no proof that we are biologically programmed to desire certain characteristics.
EVERYTHING IN SCIENCE IS THEORETICAL

I have already said this, there is quite alot of proof that we are programmed to desire certain charecteristics. As the BP community knows this includes thing like facial structure, symmetry, clear skin and ceratin body types, yk like the monkey nueron activation meme - that is literally what happens.
Google is free man, pls just research - whether its psychology or innate biology could be debatable but lookism is very real and very proven
 
EVERYTHING IN SCIENCE IS THEORETICAL

I have already said this, there is quite alot of proof that we are programmed to desire certain charecteristics. As the BP community knows this includes thing like facial structure, symmetry, clear skin and ceratin body types, yk like the monkey nueron activation meme - that is literally what happens.
Google is free man, pls just research - whether its psychology or innate biology could be debatable but lookism is very real and very proven
one thing tho, just bc all science is theory doesn't mean all theories about science are necessarily true, that doesn't follow, which is what your saying basically.
 
"What's there to proof? That there's guys more successful with women than the other guys? What exactly do you feel need proving
 
The proof for the objectivity of looks is what im looking for thats not necessarily proof. Likewise if there is objectivity we clearly caint access it or accurately identify it just look at ratings everyone rates different and asserts their rating is right “this person is too high”this person is rated too low, etc. we don’t even have a uniformity on the essential properties of what distinguishes a mtn from a ltn.
 
one thing tho, just bc all science is theory doesn't mean all theories about science are necessarily true, that doesn't follow, which is what your saying basically.
Never said they were, theories with evidence to back it up is true tho. Lookism in humans is something with so much evidence
 

Similar threads

the exile v2
Replies
10
Views
32
pio
pio
kai11
Replies
20
Views
106
kai11
kai11
Jason Voorhees
Replies
48
Views
408
Outlander
Outlander
dışlanmış sub3
Replies
21
Views
72
TheTallnUgly
T
Im sorry mother
Replies
32
Views
143
dragomog
dragomog

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top